Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #90603
    149 208 3 Q

    corsetlover69 said:
    Oooo I love this! As my name implies I really like corsets :)

    Thank you, love them too :D especially in steampunk style.
    Your works are amazing too btw!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90733
    39 74 1 E
    post #90780
    266 418 5 E
    post #90511
    292 492 5 E
    post #90515
    172 258 7 E

    shanti said:
    It's stupid. The prettier images, with the extra finger (or lack thereof) removed... This one doesn't.

    I mean, you are welcome to just flat out call something 'stupid' but it doesn't affect the truth that a faceless male can be stylised without eyes as a means of the viewers self insertion into the image.
    It has been done plenty of times on both the AI Site and Main E6 site drawn by artists for that very reason.

    Want to make something with extra fingers, go for it, no one is stopping you. As long as it is actually part of the character, and not a temper tantrum over the rules, you are free to do what you want.

    Just remember that doing something just to be petty probably wont reflect well.

    Remember, personal growth also comes by sometime taking the L and moving on with the day
    e6 wiki page for anon, for your reading pleasure https://e621.net/wiki_pages/8336

    Updated

  • |
  • 4
  • post #90754
    273 458 20 E

    shanti said:
    What's stopping me from making an extra finger for a character? Or remove it.

    It's stupid to remove the eyes.

    Please don't leave comments like this.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #85943
    95 136 2 E
    post #90754
    273 458 20 E
    post #90763
    117 184 12 E

    shanti said:
    More versatile? It seems to me that they are: Intentional generation errors.
    So because of some small error (an extra finger or lack thereof) we delete an image, but an image where the eyes are SPECIALLY removed, no!

    No, DeNatural is correct. The eyes are removed intentionally. It's an extremely common practice. I don't like the finger rule either, but our dear janny is spot on here.

    https://e621.net/posts/4791136?q=anon+order%3Ascore+-animated
    https://e621.net/posts/4364024?q=anon+order%3Ascore+-animated
    https://e621.net/posts/4170110?q=anon+order%3Ascore+-animated

  • |
  • 7
  • 6 3 1 S
    post #90754
    273 458 20 E

    shanti said:
    What's stopping me from making an extra finger for a character? Or remove it.

    It's stupid to remove the eyes.

    Choose a different hill to die on. This is common.

  • |
  • 11
  • 2 1 1 E
    post #88299
    517 970 7 E
    post #90724
    235 403 10 E
    post #90515
    172 258 7 E

    majinbreed said:
    cannot see why this was flagged.
    nothing out of the ordinary here.
    if flagged for male eyes then that is wrong due to using an 'eyeless' male to depict the 'anon' character, without a green head.

    It's stupid. The prettier images, with the extra finger (or lack thereof) removed... This one doesn't.

  • |
  • -9
  • post #90763
    117 184 12 E

    DeNatural

    Former Staff

    shanti said:
    Where are the eyes?!

    its in minimalist self-insertion style. You remove facial details, especially eyes, to make characters more universally relatable.

  • |
  • 7
  • post #90702
    275 525 2 E
    post #90696
    200 368 3 E
    post #90515
    172 258 7 E

    cannot see why this was flagged.
    nothing out of the ordinary here.
    if flagged for male eyes then that is wrong due to using an 'eyeless' male to depict the 'anon' character, without a green head.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #90754
    273 458 20 E

    shanti said:
    Where are the eyes?!

    a way to display a faceless, or anonymous, male is to leave out the eyes
    this isnt uncommon

  • |
  • 13
  • post #90543
    165 295 3 E
    post #90515
    172 258 7 E
    post #85731
    24 15 2 S
    post #90533
    236 337 1 E
    post #90686
    358 666 3 E

    >every fertility drug in the village

    So she took one of everything, or she consumed all of the village's drugs? From the look of her eyes, it could be either, lol. Loving that deep, deep cameltoe!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #90590
    144 254 3 E
    post #90724
    235 403 10 E

    ailurus said:
    Aww thanks! I'm still trying to get bovine pussy to work, it takes a LOT of tweaking! If I can get something cleaner tonight I'll post it as a sibling post!

    Like FurriestGunin said, I completely agree, this is just so awesome from the teats to the bovine bits there... don't stop!

  • |
  • 4
  • post #89789
    101 175 1 E
    post #89887
    48 79 2 Q
    post #90602
    83 130 1 Q
    post #90595
    154 315 1 E
    post #90603
    149 208 3 Q
    post #90022
    152 218 5 E
    post #90635
    165 256 3 E
    post #90680
    285 460 5 Q
    48 51 2 E
    post #90742
    338 608 1 E

    Die machart einfach nur klasse hey meist du du würdest auch ein Bamelin Mänlich und nen vilpix weiblich hinbekommen?

  • |
  • 0
  • 94 158 1 E

    I'm not sure whether to be glad or disappointed that you missed out on the obvious pun of swapping the "ar" in that last word with a "u"...

  • |
  • -5
  • post #90724
    235 403 10 E

    Holy Cow! By the mother of anatomical correct bovine organs, i love this! We need more correct udders and pussies. There are not enough equine and bovine ladys. :D

  • |
  • 8
  • post #79580
    154 258 4 E

    Wow! that's something you don't see every day, a proper darker shading down the asscrack/genitalia valley! (You usually only find it on horse or goat art.)
    That is some absurdly pleasing detail!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #82176
    28 25 1 S
    post #90457
    42 55 4 Q
    post #89961
    32 55 1 E
    post #90441
    117 159 2 S
    post #90690
    147 235 2 E
    post #90691
    28 31 1 S
    post #90718
    154 235 1 Q
    post #90729
    113 181 1 E
    post #90587
    543 943 7 E

    sdai4 said:
    This might be one of my favorite images ever, thank you for creating and sharing it! Never enough ninetales, especially of this quality :D

    Jap sehe ich auch so die qualität ist so gut da freut mann sich auf mehr

  • |
  • 2
  • post #90686
    358 666 3 E
    post #88855
    27 56 2 E
    post #89336
    75 109 3 E

    xxxmistercoolxxx said:
    When I first saw the picture I thought it was from Dimwitdog.

    Its missing the whole screen hue. Honestly i do hope people would start not usine too much of a artist style as a prefeerence.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90356
    222 407 3 E
    post #90471
    139 241 2 E
    post #90517
    168 291 1 E
    post #64446
    21 52 1 E
    post #90543
    165 295 3 E
    post #90565
    146 239 1 E
    post #90384
    111 190 5 Q
    post #90635
    165 256 3 E
    post #90638
    216 358 3 E
    post #90674
    74 123 2 E
    post #90289
    71 86 10 S

    busahou said:
    I prefer the completely unhackable method of Documents > Homework > furry

    Encrypt it into a .png file coded at the end.... if clivcked on its a 1 gig image of a cat goes right past them... you lose files from time to time but thats the game

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90702
    275 525 2 E
    post #90724
    235 403 10 E

    ailurus said:
    Aww thanks! I'm still trying to get bovine pussy to work, it takes a LOT of tweaking! If I can get something cleaner tonight I'll post it as a sibling post!

    You're doing pretty damn good. Most just let it throw a horse pussy on there and call it "anatomically correct".

  • |
  • 8
  • post #90446
    199 385 1 E
    post #90490
    287 485 1 E
    post #90680
    285 460 5 Q

    Pretty scalie showing her armpit while looking a bit pissed? Hell yea I'll make that a phone wallpaper!

  • |
  • 2
  • post #90696
    200 368 3 E
    post #90720
    153 236 1 Q
    post #90723
    147 216 5 E
    post #90705
    44 98 2 E
    post #90707
    49 87 2 E
    post #90724
    235 403 10 E
    post #90587
    543 943 7 E

    This might be one of my favorite images ever, thank you for creating and sharing it! Never enough ninetales, especially of this quality :D

  • |
  • 4