Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #70250
    180 341 2 E
    post #70258
    120 198 1 E

    Atir

    Member

    She's absolutely lovely <3 I'm excited to see more of her in the future!

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #69573
    64 98 3 E

    badwolf1

    Member

    raiinbow_dash said:
    Am I seeing no hands on head, and hands on head in the reflection?

    Looks to me in the reflection the hands are holding nothing, a head is missing.
    Maybe on his chest above a head that's out of sight going down?? : )

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #70231
    30 44 3 S
    post #70235
    100 197 1 E
    post #70164
    95 174 2 E
    post #70233
    92 132 1 E
    69 127 11 E
    69 127 11 E

    FlowerSylveon

    Privileged

    gregtheanon said:
    Double standards… e621 allows this, yet e6ai does not? I’m surprised other sites have not overtaken e621/e6ai at all.

    congratulations for not reading the big pile of text above which i did explained
    if you didn't want to and want to know the answer directly from a staff member then check forum #22 where Lance Armstrong literally says

    I haven't been told the reason, but my guess is that it is to avoid legal complications that could be caused by image models that are trained on actual child pornography. Even if 100% of those posts come from models trained only on furry drawings, the risk remains.

    The legal battles involving AI art are just starting. For all we know this site will have to shut down within a few years if the copyright battles play out a certain way.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #70231
    30 44 3 S
    69 127 11 E

    Technical-Grid

    Janitor

    Eh, originally the male was about 70% of what is visible here, so I've scaled up his limbs and buffed him up, to somewhat retain the size difference (and hold it within 18-20yrs because the original was definitely too young) , but i guess the female is too big after all for it to count :/

  • |
  • 0
    •
    69 127 11 E

    GregTheAnon

    Member

    Double standards… e621 allows this, yet e6ai does not? I’m surprised other sites have not overtaken e621/e6ai at all.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #69960
    136 260 1 E
    post #67105
    62 79 1 S
    post #67095
    336 513 3 E
    post #67082
    66 74 2 S

    Ferox

    Member

    sylvermare53 said:
    We need more of that grumpy cat, on the side...

    I was gonna say I'd love to see more of this donkey lady m'self. S'good replacement page though.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #70217
    145 201 1 E
    post #70158
    167 263 7 E

    Pervo

    Blocked

    gosh. tall and long, must be strong. boing boing boing. video generation is becoming so good

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #70186
    114 178 2 E
    post #67453
    160 248 4 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    potato_salad said:
    I don't put much thought into the descriptions, man. Saw the cloud was illuminated so maybe sun is out of veiw of us, but the deer can see it

    Don't worry,I was just being cheeky

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #67998
    103 170 4 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    purplesimp said:
    Yes I can see why, I just love this picture ratio as it's just the full character body, that why I love Dakimakura picture too, I will see to make good one like this with different picture ratio

    Hey I'm not complaining at all. In Fact I just discovered the fit(vertical) button😅

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #70143
    45 73 2 E
    post #68018
    104 166 1 E
    post #70123
    54 77 2 E

    blp

    Member

    foxymutt said:
    I like 👍

    thanks! i'm very slow but i didn't forget about your request. :) i actually have a few more to post, probably on Monday.

    and congrats on you 1k posts 😺

    heh, not so sure i should be proud of that.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #70129
    37 56 2 E
    post #70126
    31 30 4 E

    blp

    Member

    foxymutt said:
    Nice 👍

    thanks! i'm glad people seem to like this. i hesitate before posting these experimental (or sketchy) styles especially after the advent of the stricter quality control.

    pretty sure something like this ( https://e6ai.net/posts/53975 ) with its weird, surreal background wouldn't get approved these days although the people i asked before posting said they actually thought it added to the image rather than being a flaw.

    yero8 said:
    Can you please make a female version of this art, if possible? Very nice

    here you go: https://e6ai.net/posts/70203

    also a version with canine-ish anatomy on rule34.xxx. don't want to post too many similar things here: https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=11638476

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #65520
    121 186 5 Q

    Jethro

    Member

    horsefucker5 said:
    It's bonkers that there are only 2 pictures of Sheila on this entire website. I really must be an old-fur because I'm guessing the new generation of furries probably don't know who she is.

    You might be right! I'll never forget Sheila from the 90s! We need more of her here!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #68098
    224 378 5 Q
    post #70064
    269 442 3 E
    post #68271
    14 14 2 S
    post #69826
    9 55 2 E
    post #70030
    70 110 5 E
    post #70182
    63 92 1 E
    post #70126
    31 30 4 E

    Yero8

    Member

    Can you please make a female version of this art, if possible? Very nice

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #70117
    24 38 3 Q
    post #70158
    167 263 7 E
    post #70149
    119 223 2 E

    user 27826

    Member

    horsefucker5 said:
    I know he's a fox, but come on, there's nothing he can do with that thing. It would be like trying to fit a pool noodle inside a Chihuahua

    He can still use his tongue and hands. I know I would.

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #70057
    48 75 1 E
    post #67013
    166 272 5 E

    badwolf1

    Member

    cybercraft said:
    About right to me.

    I agree, this one after looking at her over and over again and making a little wish, is not bad at all.
    But front_pussy really kills some good art.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #70121
    44 61 1 E
    post #70126
    31 30 4 E
    post #70129
    37 56 2 E
    post #67940
    201 335 13 E
    post #70123
    54 77 2 E
    post #58488
    93 153 5 E

    wolfucker666

    Member

    FYI kangaroos actually have their testicles on the *other* side of the penis, very unique part of their anatomy compared to other mammals

  • |
  • 3
    •
    69 127 11 E

    FlowerSylveon

    Privileged

    chastitycoyote said:
    but it is interesting to see obvious bias on what constitutes flagging and not.

    that's on the user who is flagging, one user doesn't represent everyone

    chastitycoyote said:
    why the possible underage female at the start of this pool was not flagged by them as well.

    if you mean the first picture it's because it doesn't have any sort of lewd acts happening, looks to be just a wedding or somesorts

    and in my opinion i could view most of the pictures just as size difference than age difference
    but just judging but the tags that have been put here it's clearly not the intention and it is an age difference

    however the description does say "18th birthday" but that or any description doesn't mean anything if it doesn't correlate to the image
    however 2:electric boogalo, this male fox in this pic alone doesn't look underage or anything, just looks like an young adult and i think that the one who flagged this thought of the first picture and went along with the second because as contrary of post #70056 which does look underage, the size of the fox is relatively ok in every aspect, even the dick as not all adults with dicks will suddenly have a cock with half the length of the body

    anyways the ones that are flagged now seems to be the right ones to be removed while the others seems ok

    feckin_ded_m8 said:
    That's absolutely ridiculous. Who on earth was in charge of that idea?

    Who's to say any NN or model hasn't been trained on actual porn of underage people(because yes it has happened before more than just once)
    You can't be too sure and go "well mine certainly doesn't"
    And the problem is using data of pornographic material of minors can lead to some funny law stuff which i'm pretty certain it's not funny at all if it happens

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #70108
    299 580 2 E
    post #70111
    260 425 1 E
    post #70135
    58 59 2 S
    post #70160
    121 214 3 E
    post #61944
    366 657 2 E
    post #70146
    26 36 1 Q
    post #70149
    119 223 2 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    I know he's a fox, but come on, there's nothing he can do with that thing. It would be like trying to fit a pool noodle inside a Chihuahua

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #70158
    167 263 7 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    coolguy47 said:
    This is really fucking good

    The way the fabric moves is like, better than where I thought consumer grade video generators were at

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #70159
    188 373 2 E
    post #70159
    188 373 2 E
    post #70160
    121 214 3 E
    post #69179
    97 148 2 E
    69 127 11 E

    Feckin ded m8

    Member

    anon said:

    It's likely flagged because for whatever reason on e6ai you aren't allowed to have cub or young subjects doing lewd acts even though they are fine with it on e621. Makes no sense at all

    That's absolutely ridiculous. Who on earth was in charge of that idea?

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #70158
    167 263 7 E
    69 127 11 E

    ChastityCoyote

    Member

    anon said:

    It's likely flagged because for whatever reason on e6ai you aren't allowed to have cub or young subjects doing lewd acts even though they are fine with it on e621. Makes no sense at all

    Going by the flaggers metrics, curious why the possible underage female at the start of this pool was not flagged by them as well.

    I completely agree and understand the TOS of the site on why underage is verboten, but it is interesting to see obvious bias on what constitutes flagging and not.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #69752
    23 30 1 E
    post #70145
    75 89 2 E
    post #68965
    93 155 1 E

    Kaleth

    Janitor

    I would love to know the prompt you used for this image; it's gorgeous

  • |
  • 0
    •
    69 127 11 E

    Anon

    Member

    badwolf1 said:
    flag.. why?
    Looks wonderful to me.

    It's likely flagged because for whatever reason on e6ai you aren't allowed to have cub or young subjects doing lewd acts even though they are fine with it on e621. Makes no sense at all

  • |
  • 4
    •
    69 127 11 E
    post #70100
    65 66 1 Q
    post #69120
    6 14 2 S

    Lucifluffy

    Member

    scout said:
    Contrarily to what you might think, not everyone downvotes because of disliking the actual art content depicted. My reasons for downvoting an image like this personally is the low-quality format it's being saved at and uploaded. I don't even have to zoom in to see all the obvious jpeg artifacts pretty much everywhere. It's actually against the uploading policy to not meet the quality standard for uploads on e6ai, you should read that. Highly, badly compressed jpegs would be good enough for twitter or other social medias where every art gets put through their compression algorithm and every art piece loses quality anyway, but archiving services aims to retain the best quality format possible.

    With all the AI tools available for generating, upscaling, img2img, hi-res fix, inpainting, there's no excuse for uploading a badly compressed version of the generated image on here.

    Also, low-effort tagging is really annoying to some user. I actually have 'gun' in my blacklist for a reason. Don't need to see, don't care. Yet I keep seeing them because you don't take the minimum effort of tagging your content appropriately and thoroughly. When you don't do that, you're just inviting people to see content they don't wanna see and downvote them. I shouldn't have to manually edit every post by adding tags that I don't wanna see to finally have a good browsing experience on e6ai.

    Apologies

  • |
  • -3
    •
    post #70090
    232 409 3 E
    post #70102
    48 68 1 S
    post #69899
    100 175 1 E
    post #69904
    55 74 1 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    When I got my playstation 2, it was a furry paradise. Daxter, Ratchet, Sly Clooper, and Amaterasu 🤤

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #69906
    30 31 1 S
    post #69942
    211 334 1 E
    post #69962
    115 216 4 E