Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #184189
    80 97 3 Q
    post #183694
    92 156 4 E
    post #184176
    52 87 2 E
    post #184348
    88 57 27 S

    DRLa

    Developer

    n_n said:
    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

    Posts approved before the current quality guidelined are allowed to stay. Otherwise we'd have to pretty much delete everything from the first two years of the site...

  • |
  • 11
    •
    post #184348
    88 57 27 S

    unnatural order

    Member

    That tooth line is a bit thick on the front... could be dental abnormality. And that dot between the tail and body, possible artifact!

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #184348
    88 57 27 S

    n n

    Member

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184348
    88 57 27 S

    FlaFsteR

    Member

    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

  • |
  • 14
    •
    46 3 2 Q
    post #184348
    88 57 27 S
    post #184348
    88 57 27 S
    post #184348
    88 57 27 S
    post #184348
    88 57 27 S
    34 35 9 Q

    n n

    Member

    Can't stop showing this to friends lol. This is just my kinda fun

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184274
    44 52 3 S

    n n

    Member

    grove_ellar said:
    I wish the depth of field wasn't so potent (for purely selfish reasons) but she does have gracefully enchanting eyes.

    I get ya 😉
    Luckily there are more great gens in the gallery to watch that aren't dof'd

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184347
    180 242 6 E
    post #184347
    180 242 6 E
    post #182021
    54 76 2 Q
    post #184167
    197 302 7 E

    IlIllIlIllI

    Member

    medicineball said:
    I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

    I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

    That's great to hear, thank you. Regarding the question, I mean that some things I generate work perfectly, without any inpainting or regeneration, but others, like this one, take a very long time to render. Most models probably aren't trained to do this, which is why the whole picture falls apart, even with a detailed sketch for Scribble. Idk, just trying to explain this to myself.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184340
    155 228 2 E
    post #184331
    78 95 2 Q
    post #184290
    72 107 8 E
    post #184327
    214 338 3 E
    post #184324
    80 110 1 Q
    post #184300
    41 67 2 Q

    waywardneutrino

    Member

    A lot of Zoc's gens have this kind of subtle hint of fur texture that I absolutely adore: it gives just enough to impart a look of fuzzy softness without crossing into the territory of over-rendered, long rough fur. I must learn how to reproduce a similar effect by hand in Krita- it's so damn nice.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184318
    242 381 3 E
    post #184314
    88 171 2 E

    n n

    Member

    XD Ain't furry logic just the best? Girthy snake-balls and juicy peen complete with foreskin :P

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184303
    117 172 1 E
    post #184274
    44 52 3 S

    Grove Ellar

    Member

    n_n said:
    These closeups of precious kobold faces are such a treat ❤️

    I wish the depth of field wasn't so potent (for purely selfish reasons) but she does have gracefully enchanting eyes.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184028
    106 166 2 E

    Hammapajamma

    Member

    zheneric said:
    I might just "accidentally" trip and fall while appearing to steal some copper.

    Oh don't worry, I'm sure they'll help you get back up (after you get down), they're not bad sports.

    Only issue is that the law usually arrives before they get the chance to. Turns out a knot at each end is a pretty effective way of keeping a person detained. (°ー°〃)

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
    •
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184314
    88 171 2 E
    post #184219
    35 42 1 E
    post #184343
    132 189 2 E
    post #184167
    197 302 7 E

    medicineball

    Member

    ilillililli said:
    Btw... By looking at some works on the site I am feeling like I am using some sort of orchish technics. Some others having a more clean results. I've tried to switch between models, experimented with upscalers/without them... Still the result is much worse. What am I doing wrong?!

    I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

    I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184315
    137 198 1 E
    post #184318
    242 381 3 E
    post #184322
    169 258 6 E
    post #184327
    214 338 3 E
    post #183675
    136 141 9 S

    TerraRaptor

    Privileged

    turtonturakon11 said:
    My first impression of them being extremelly cold, aloof, distant. I thought befriending with them is borderline impossible.

    Yeah, course correction, I may have overdone it in the earlier art. There is some of that, but ultimately, individuality still allows for all types.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #182817
    151 251 4 E
    post #183867
    102 113 11 E
    12 16 1 Q
    post #184288
    95 132 2 E
    post #184289
    84 113 3 E
    post #184061
    20 20 1 S
    87 0 6 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #183990
    172 243 2 E
    post #184028
    106 166 2 E
    post #184027
    107 101 5 Q

    ZhenEric

    Member

    She'd give the best hugs bar none.

    She definitely looks more feline. What species did you have in mind?

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #183890
    30 21 5 S
    post #184024
    99 116 2 E
    post #184112
    318 534 3 E
    post #184109
    329 529 7 E
    post #184180
    107 152 2 E
    post #184202
    96 165 3 E
    post #184234
    238 399 2 E
    post #184285
    66 118 1 E
    post #184287
    142 192 5 E
    post #184288
    95 132 2 E
    87 0 6 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184286
    37 58 2 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184222
    184 274 1 E
    post #184233
    219 349 3 E
    post #184176
    52 87 2 E
    post #184269
    80 117 10 E
    46 3 2 Q
    post #183646
    2 11 1 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184070
    40 50 1 E
    34 35 9 Q
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184269
    80 117 10 E

    DuckSiri

    Member

    n_n said:
    Very sweet action 🥰 I can't wait to see what he has in store :P

    Gotta show her a good time! The night is still young! 😉

  • |
  • 3
    •