Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #169992
    91 140 2 E
    post #169208
    330 512 3 E
    post #169184
    77 75 3 Q
    post #170113
    267 451 4 E

    Grove Ellar

    Member

    She deserves a masterwork full-body harness, gold sapphire necklace, floral horn bands and practical tail bags. Might as well accessorize if she's going to let you take the lead.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #170116
    125 173 2 Q
    post #170109
    8 5 2 S

    gridanon

    Member

    Nicely done Sawmill! It's rare to see you post gens but whenever you do they're always really well done. Your Undertale scenes have all been superb but it's really interesting to see you do an original character like this. Nice job with the joints and the skeleton look, plus the pose is really creative and interesting too. Great work!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #152171
    173 270 4 E
    post #167720
    245 414 7 E

    LionXLD

    Member

    tempting said:
    You can do that or blob them in with any art program (ms paint is enough) and a couple of moderate-denoise inpaints to preserve a pose/composition. I mostly do the latter, but either way the last step is a soft inpainting pass to minimize stitches/halos. If you need anything else feel free to pm me.

    You're so kind, I wish I could do that too. But most importantly, your idea is absolutely fantastic.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #170109
    8 5 2 S
    post #169923
    19 8 9 E

    boxelby945

    Member

    sslloorrbboo said:
    I'm just a bit of a lurker but I find your pics to be really fun. I hope you keep posting. It's interesting to see what you come up with. Weird stuff has lots of enjoyers simply because it's weird. Much love!

    Appreciate the kind words. I shall see what the pot of weirdness can offer in the future!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #84710
    17 7 1 E
    post #170008
    210 334 9 E
    post #170107
    54 39 2 S

    n n

    Member

    This i really like. Not many games i play let me have a massive wolf companion (or an armored human pet for that matter)

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #170106
    34 60 1 Q
    post #169923
    19 8 9 E

    sslloorrbboo

    Member

    I'm just a bit of a lurker but I find your pics to be really fun. I hope you keep posting. It's interesting to see what you come up with. Weird stuff has lots of enjoyers simply because it's weird. Much love!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #170055
    33 24 2 S
    post #169878
    36 22 3 S

    Underwolf69

    Member

    the punch line is hilarious and number 34 had best run as fast as he can.

    What I find impressive is that the gen is getting lip movements - on *non-human* characters - down good enough you could just about lip-read them.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #169921
    39 30 13 S

    Underwolf69

    Member

    bahufaru said:
    As I work with Google Gemini, I have reached a point where I can feed it multiple reference images and detailed descriptions, have it ingest them all and produce a pretty good model, and then send that to the animation pipeline, including dialogue lines and directions for voice types and accents.

    The prompting for this wasn't particularly difficult, and it's in natural language, basically just "Animate Kafeel Scirocco chopping vegetables in a school cafeteria kitchen, in a photorealistic style similar to student video productions. Have him regard the viewer and say, in his Sudanese accent, "My name is Kafeel Scirocco. It is my jobs to nourishes the hungries.""

    The real work is in the significant amount of reference images and concept text, character explaining, etc, that went into reaching a point where Gemini fully understood the on-model design of the character and could fully understand what "Kafeel Scirocco" means, conceptually and visually.

    The nice thing is that once that work is done, my instance of Gemini reliably produces media of the character, because it understands what the character is and what he should look and sound like.

    You should create an instructional video of this process for us know-nothings (and for me it's even less than nothing) so we might be able to create established characters of our own to work with.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #169784
    219 328 3 E
    post #170008
    210 334 9 E
    post #170080
    312 489 7 E
    post #170091
    57 62 5 E
    8 12 2 E
    125 207 2 E

    Pyrodelic

    Member

    Oh come on! That watermark is just TOO intrusive right there. (I only complain because I love it.)

  • |
  • 6
    •
    post #169997
    81 112 1 E
    post #150464
    82 157 6 E

    Tigerpile

    Member

    Ah yes, the completely debunked myth that people refuse to let die. Yeah, there are similarities. No, it was not a copy, a ripoff, or anything like what this poster claims.

    In 1994, Takayuki Matsutani, the president of Osamu Tezuka’s production company Tezuka Productions, said:

    Quite a few staff of our company saw a preview of “The Lion King,” discussed this subject and came to the conclusion that you cannot avoid having these similarities as long as you use animals as characters and try to draw images out of them.

    Quote is from Huffpost but I've seen it other places too, that was just the easiest to find with a search.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #148480
    82 99 3 S
    post #170043
    6 4 1 Q
    post #170093
    104 129 1 S

    n n

    Member

    Oh yes! more of the super adorable husky ❤️❤️❤️ :D Thank you!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #163492
    68 42 6 S

    foxntail

    Member

    dodgey_roger said:
    What about the male fox not having a tail at all? Lol

    I didn’t even notice that fox tail on the horse until people pointed it out in the comments. And as for the male fox… let’s just imagine that his tail hangs to the right, i.e. behind his body :)

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #123484
    320 529 1 E
    post #170039
    82 139 1 E

    Makai

    Member

    Wow, super picture—awesome! Is it possible to get this in the "mega" form too? Only if you can, of course. ^^

  • |
  • 3
    •
    8 12 2 E

    Daraix

    Member

    I think she is hinting at something. I need to continue observing some more of this behavior

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #145288
    26 15 4 S
    post #167801
    41 46 4 S
    post #169987
    99 97 3 S
    post #169989
    69 106 10 Q
    post #170025
    69 101 2 E
    post #169290
    88 131 1 E
    post #118486
    151 294 1 E
    post #170044
    21 21 1 S
    post #151633
    48 33 9 S
    40 42 1 E
    7 12 1 E
    post #170053
    138 233 4 E
    13 13 2 Q
    post #170057
    24 48 1 E
    post #170065
    263 425 2 E
    post #170080
    312 489 7 E
    post #170086
    78 122 1 E
    post #167819
    144 285 1 E
    post #170013
    20 16 2 S
    post #170080
    312 489 7 E
    post #170069
    5 15 2 S
    post #170063
    145 216 3 E
    post #170063
    145 216 3 E
    post #164364
    0 5 1 E
    28 28 1 E
    post #170055
    33 24 2 S
    post #167340
    283 477 1 E
    post #163492
    68 42 6 S
    post #170033
    59 74 1 S
    post #163623
    77 144 4 E

    dodgey roger

    Member

    Only OG’s remember when dithering like this was necessary for systems limited to 16-bit color, limited space to store images, or limited bandwidth to load them (think 56kbps or less). This would look so silky smooth on a CRT.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #170030
    152 244 1 E
    post #170023
    138 211 1 E
    post #170020
    41 61 2 E
    post #167720
    245 414 7 E

    Tempting

    Member

    lionxld said:
    So you used Photoshop to stitch them together in post-production?

    You can do that or blob them in with any art program (ms paint is enough) and a couple of moderate-denoise inpaints to preserve a pose/composition. I mostly do the latter, but either way the last step is a soft inpainting pass to minimize stitches/halos. If you need anything else feel free to pm me.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #152947
    34 18 3 S
    post #165330
    32 48 2 E
    post #155685
    438 739 8 E
    post #166256
    16 22 4 S
    post #170017
    204 344 6 E
    post #157687
    257 443 9 Q
    post #170062
    135 228 3 E
    post #166204
    33 12 2 S