Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #183694
    91 154 4 E
    post #184176
    51 85 2 E
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S

    n_n said:
    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

    Posts approved before the current quality guidelined are allowed to stay. Otherwise we'd have to pretty much delete everything from the first two years of the site...

  • |
  • 11
  • post #184348
    87 56 27 S

    That tooth line is a bit thick on the front... could be dental abnormality. And that dot between the tail and body, possible artifact!

  • |
  • 5
  • post #184348
    87 56 27 S

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184348
    87 56 27 S

    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

  • |
  • 14
  • 46 3 2 Q
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S
    34 35 9 Q

    Can't stop showing this to friends lol. This is just my kinda fun

  • |
  • 0
  • post #184274
    44 51 3 S

    grove_ellar said:
    I wish the depth of field wasn't so potent (for purely selfish reasons) but she does have gracefully enchanting eyes.

    I get ya 😉
    Luckily there are more great gens in the gallery to watch that aren't dof'd

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184347
    180 241 6 E
    post #184347
    180 241 6 E
    post #182021
    54 76 2 Q
    post #184167
    195 302 7 E

    medicineball said:
    I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

    I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

    That's great to hear, thank you. Regarding the question, I mean that some things I generate work perfectly, without any inpainting or regeneration, but others, like this one, take a very long time to render. Most models probably aren't trained to do this, which is why the whole picture falls apart, even with a detailed sketch for Scribble. Idk, just trying to explain this to myself.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #184340
    155 227 2 E
    post #184331
    78 95 2 Q
    post #184290
    72 107 8 E
    post #184327
    211 336 3 E
    post #184324
    80 109 1 Q
    post #184300
    41 66 2 Q

    A lot of Zoc's gens have this kind of subtle hint of fur texture that I absolutely adore: it gives just enough to impart a look of fuzzy softness without crossing into the territory of over-rendered, long rough fur. I must learn how to reproduce a similar effect by hand in Krita- it's so damn nice.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184318
    242 380 3 E
    post #184314
    88 170 2 E

    XD Ain't furry logic just the best? Girthy snake-balls and juicy peen complete with foreskin :P

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184303
    116 171 1 E
    post #184274
    44 51 3 S

    n_n said:
    These closeups of precious kobold faces are such a treat ❤️

    I wish the depth of field wasn't so potent (for purely selfish reasons) but she does have gracefully enchanting eyes.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #184028
    106 166 2 E

    zheneric said:
    I might just "accidentally" trip and fall while appearing to steal some copper.

    Oh don't worry, I'm sure they'll help you get back up (after you get down), they're not bad sports.

    Only issue is that the law usually arrives before they get the chance to. Turns out a knot at each end is a pretty effective way of keeping a person detained. (°ー°〃)

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • 34 35 9 Q
    post #184314
    88 170 2 E
    post #184219
    35 42 1 E
    post #184343
    130 186 2 E
    post #184167
    195 302 7 E

    ilillililli said:
    Btw... By looking at some works on the site I am feeling like I am using some sort of orchish technics. Some others having a more clean results. I've tried to switch between models, experimented with upscalers/without them... Still the result is much worse. What am I doing wrong?!

    I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

    I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #184315
    135 196 1 E
    post #184318
    242 380 3 E
    post #184322
    168 255 6 E
    post #184327
    211 336 3 E
    post #183675
    136 141 9 S

    turtonturakon11 said:
    My first impression of them being extremelly cold, aloof, distant. I thought befriending with them is borderline impossible.

    Yeah, course correction, I may have overdone it in the earlier art. There is some of that, but ultimately, individuality still allows for all types.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #182817
    150 249 4 E
    post #183867
    101 112 11 E
    12 16 1 Q
    post #184288
    95 132 2 E
    post #184289
    84 111 3 E
    post #184061
    20 20 1 S
    87 0 6 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #183990
    172 243 2 E
    post #184028
    106 166 2 E
    post #184027
    104 98 5 Q

    She'd give the best hugs bar none.

    She definitely looks more feline. What species did you have in mind?

  • |
  • 3
  • post #183890
    30 21 5 S
    post #184024
    98 115 2 E
    post #184112
    317 532 3 E
    post #184109
    327 527 7 E
    post #184180
    107 152 2 E
    post #184202
    95 163 3 E
    post #184234
    234 394 2 E
    post #184285
    66 118 1 E
    post #184287
    142 190 5 E
    post #184288
    95 132 2 E
    87 0 6 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184286
    37 58 2 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184222
    182 272 1 E
    post #184233
    217 347 3 E
    post #184176
    51 85 2 E
    post #184269
    80 116 10 E
    46 3 2 Q
    post #183646
    2 10 1 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184070
    39 49 1 E
    34 35 9 Q
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184269
    80 116 10 E

    n_n said:
    Very sweet action 🥰 I can't wait to see what he has in store :P

    Gotta show her a good time! The night is still young! 😉

  • |
  • 3
  • 97 144 2 E

    I'm so torn between wanting to set her free and also wanting to see what happens next to her >_>"

  • |
  • 2