Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #184202
    95 161 3 E
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S

    Lor7n

    Janitor

    n_n said:
    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

    Whether people are using local models or not, the quality of gens has been improving pretty significantly over time. We’d also like to see people make use of those improvements to create better and more creative work.

    A lot of those older posts were approved because they represented the level of quality that was achievable at the time. Standards change as the tools improve. If we applied today’s standards to everything that was posted two years ago, I imagine going back and deleting all of it would be quite a massive undertaking

  • |
  • 9
    •
    post #184185
    141 198 3 E
    post #184189
    79 94 3 Q
    post #183694
    90 151 4 E
    post #184176
    50 82 2 E
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S

    DRLa

    Developer

    n_n said:
    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

    Posts approved before the current quality guidelined are allowed to stay. Otherwise we'd have to pretty much delete everything from the first two years of the site...

  • |
  • 11
    •
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S

    unnatural order

    Member

    That tooth line is a bit thick on the front... could be dental abnormality. And that dot between the tail and body, possible artifact!

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S

    n n

    Member

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S

    FlaFsteR

    Member

    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

  • |
  • 14
    •
    46 3 2 Q
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S
    post #184348
    87 56 27 S
    34 35 9 Q

    n n

    Member

    Can't stop showing this to friends lol. This is just my kinda fun

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184274
    44 50 3 S

    n n

    Member

    grove_ellar said:
    I wish the depth of field wasn't so potent (for purely selfish reasons) but she does have gracefully enchanting eyes.

    I get ya 😉
    Luckily there are more great gens in the gallery to watch that aren't dof'd

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184347
    180 239 6 E
    post #184347
    180 239 6 E
    post #182021
    54 75 2 Q
    post #184167
    195 302 7 E

    IlIllIlIllI

    Member

    medicineball said:
    I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

    I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

    That's great to hear, thank you. Regarding the question, I mean that some things I generate work perfectly, without any inpainting or regeneration, but others, like this one, take a very long time to render. Most models probably aren't trained to do this, which is why the whole picture falls apart, even with a detailed sketch for Scribble. Idk, just trying to explain this to myself.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184340
    155 224 2 E
    post #184331
    78 93 2 Q
    post #184290
    70 106 8 E
    post #184327
    209 334 3 E
    post #184324
    80 106 1 Q
    post #184300
    40 63 2 Q

    waywardneutrino

    Member

    A lot of Zoc's gens have this kind of subtle hint of fur texture that I absolutely adore: it gives just enough to impart a look of fuzzy softness without crossing into the territory of over-rendered, long rough fur. I must learn how to reproduce a similar effect by hand in Krita- it's so damn nice.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184318
    241 377 3 E
    post #184314
    88 169 2 E

    n n

    Member

    XD Ain't furry logic just the best? Girthy snake-balls and juicy peen complete with foreskin :P

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184303
    114 167 1 E
    post #184274
    44 50 3 S

    Grove Ellar

    Member

    n_n said:
    These closeups of precious kobold faces are such a treat ❤️

    I wish the depth of field wasn't so potent (for purely selfish reasons) but she does have gracefully enchanting eyes.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184028
    105 166 2 E

    Hammapajamma

    Member

    zheneric said:
    I might just "accidentally" trip and fall while appearing to steal some copper.

    Oh don't worry, I'm sure they'll help you get back up (after you get down), they're not bad sports.

    Only issue is that the law usually arrives before they get the chance to. Turns out a knot at each end is a pretty effective way of keeping a person detained. (°ー°〃)

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
    •
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184314
    88 169 2 E
    post #184219
    34 41 1 E
    post #184343
    129 182 2 E
    post #184167
    195 302 7 E

    medicineball

    Member

    ilillililli said:
    Btw... By looking at some works on the site I am feeling like I am using some sort of orchish technics. Some others having a more clean results. I've tried to switch between models, experimented with upscalers/without them... Still the result is much worse. What am I doing wrong?!

    I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

    I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184315
    133 192 1 E
    post #184318
    241 377 3 E
    post #184322
    168 255 6 E
    post #184327
    209 334 3 E
    post #183675
    135 140 9 S

    TerraRaptor

    Privileged

    turtonturakon11 said:
    My first impression of them being extremelly cold, aloof, distant. I thought befriending with them is borderline impossible.

    Yeah, course correction, I may have overdone it in the earlier art. There is some of that, but ultimately, individuality still allows for all types.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #182817
    147 247 3 E
    post #183867
    99 109 11 E
    12 16 1 Q
    post #184288
    95 132 2 E
    post #184289
    84 111 3 E
    post #184061
    19 20 1 S
    87 0 6 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #183990
    171 243 2 E
    post #184028
    105 166 2 E
    post #184027
    104 97 5 Q

    ZhenEric

    Member

    She'd give the best hugs bar none.

    She definitely looks more feline. What species did you have in mind?

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #183890
    30 21 5 S
    post #184024
    96 112 2 E
    post #184112
    308 524 3 E
    post #184109
    327 525 7 E
    post #184180
    107 151 2 E
    post #184202
    95 161 3 E
    post #184234
    229 384 2 E
    post #184285
    66 116 1 E
    post #184287
    142 187 5 E
    post #184288
    95 132 2 E
    87 0 6 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184286
    37 56 2 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184222
    181 269 1 E
    post #184233
    215 342 3 E
    post #184176
    50 82 2 E
    post #184269
    80 115 10 E
    46 3 2 Q
    post #183646
    2 10 1 E
    34 35 9 Q
    post #184070
    38 48 1 E