Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #145806
    82 135 6 E

    Darn! This guy is a hot stuff.
    Would love to see him fuck and impregnate Nora or Chitsa.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #161097
    41 45 2 S

    Ooh, this look very good! I love the use of color here, her silhouette is so striking!

    Good job.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #161076
    175 250 1 E
    post #161023
    89 190 2 E
    post #139250
    68 105 1 Q
    post #161034
    319 535 3 E
    post #160804
    72 103 2 Q
    post #160903
    104 158 1 E
    post #160975
    155 247 1 E
    post #160996
    123 199 1 E
    post #161034
    319 535 3 E
    post #161064
    103 139 2 Q
    47 59 1 E
    post #161082
    98 126 2 E
    1 10 1 E

    Is this getting downvoted because it has issues that I don’t see or because of the content? There is a blacklist in your settings for content that you don’t like to see.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #131309
    126 187 3 E
    post #160937
    72 65 4 S
    post #160670
    48 84 1 E
    post #152992
    212 365 1 E
    post #161056
    65 83 1 E
    post #104471
    174 222 3 E
    post #160971
    71 100 2 E
    post #160970
    92 150 2 E
    post #160959
    28 64 1 E
    post #160957
    124 164 2 E
    post #160948
    211 361 1 E
    post #160944
    186 297 1 E

    I don't really mind broken anatomy like this, but that butt ain't quite connected to that torso in a realistic way

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160950
    277 460 2 E
    post #161064
    103 139 2 Q
    post #161013
    65 104 2 E
    post #161065
    103 159 1 E
    post #160921
    195 315 2 E
    post #161022
    121 199 1 E
    post #158453
    193 287 4 E

    As a professional Duchess appreciatior, I can confidently say that this is one of the best Duchess pictures ever. It really captures her character.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #161013
    65 104 2 E
    post #160934
    148 275 4 E
    post #159466
    201 282 2 E
    post #159604
    110 166 2 E

    badwolf1 said:
    only 4.4mb but the detail.
    Follicles and pussy skin texture and the tiny pussy hairs.
    Yea, and everything else but My focus is the pussy/ass.

    Thank you! Loving this compression for smaller files

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160896
    156 204 3 E

    zheneric said:
    Cute!
    The way her expression works despite the realism is really inpressive

    Thank you! I feel I need something like an expression lora to get them more consistent 😂

    khamal said:
    Oh my floof!!

    😂

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160997
    138 249 1 E
    post #160530
    316 530 3 E
    post #160069
    202 308 6 E
    post #160695
    13 29 1 Q
    post #161004
    147 244 1 E
    post #160978
    245 358 6 E

    I think it's a spectrum between truly non-sexual artistic nudity, erotica and pornography. This image is artistic but also erotic. I guess erotica is just a better name for what usually is called 'softcore porn'. Basically something featuring nudity and sex appeal but tastefully done and without genital closeups or sex.

    On the other hand a lot of imagery which is explicitly pornographic still has artistic principles applied in its creation for aesthetic appeal. So I guess it's more about the intention, whether or not the main aim is to create art or to titillate, that defines whether or not something is pornography or art.

    I guess based on that definition you could argue this image is porn, since based on the story it's placing the viewer in the place of a voyeur while the subject is enjoying being an exhibitionist.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160974
    43 39 4 S
    post #160891
    96 134 3 E
    post #160934
    148 275 4 E
    post #160891
    96 134 3 E
    post #55868
    65 127 6 E
    post #160978
    245 358 6 E
    post #160974
    43 39 4 S
    post #156655
    241 329 7 E
    post #160992
    15 42 9 E

    I'd argue Evangelion has a broader message of if we have empathy with each other we may be able to reduce everyone's suffering or at least not contribute to it.

    She's gorgeous and her voice sounds smooth by the way.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160766
    60 67 1 S
    post #120318
    89 176 1 E
    post #160957
    124 164 2 E
    post #160950
    277 460 2 E
    post #160214
    208 363 4 E
    38 25 2 Q

    okt said:
    Someday I'll know how a tattoo can be seen under the fur. Beautiful art, though.

    This is the first time I've seen something like this that's really well done.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160895
    176 263 3 E
    38 25 2 Q

    Someday I'll know how a tattoo can be seen under the fur. Beautiful art, though.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160946
    146 286 1 E
    post #160978
    245 358 6 E
    post #160978
    245 358 6 E

    Pornography is defined by the obsession over close ups of genital parts. Eroticism does not, or not that intensely. That's why the genital parts of a Greek statue was smooth for a woman, and small for a man. It was a non sexualized nudity. Vulgarity and obscenity also define pornography, but those are relative values now.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160978
    245 358 6 E
    post #160978
    245 358 6 E

    I agree, the line is the intent. Something like this pic is definitely artistic nudity and not pornography, because I don't believe it's meant to be sexual and instead showcase beauty, which it does VERY well!

    Also, she looks very tasteful! 😉

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160942
    71 101 1 E
    post #160696
    426 720 6 E

    nosuitnosoul said:
    So good~ ❤️‍🔥 But it is a little depressing that while Pokemon are obviously willing and emotionally mature enough to be partners with normal humans... if they have a choice they'd still like to get with ripped supermodels. 😑

    😦

  • |
  • 3
  • post #160925
    18 13 1 S
    post #160941
    67 80 4 S
    post #160936
    54 45 2 S
    post #160873
    36 49 1 E
    post #160927
    69 104 1 Q
    post #158255
    189 332 4 E