Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    46 72 1 E
    post #161110
    166 253 2 Q
    124 198 1 E
    post #161111
    165 246 2 E
    122 177 1 E

    She's not a "bad" bunny. She's just a bunny who needs teaching. Hard teaching.

  • |
  • 2
  • 127 276 1 Q
    141 0 2 E
    104 162 2 E
    114 175 3 E
    170 241 2 E
    153 252 2 E
    108 145 1 E
    post #161113
    205 335 4 E
    post #160971
    71 100 2 E
    post #160304
    68 95 1 E
    post #141808
    237 407 6 E

    harroden said:
    I still can't get whether this is sarcasm or not. Is there some way to check metadata that I don't know about or have missed somehow?

    It is not sarcasm! You can download the video and drag it onto a ComfyUI window to see the workflow and resources I used. The same is true of any video or image with the Prompt Metainfo tag.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #161037
    79 107 1 Q
    post #161088
    42 57 2 Q
    post #161073
    152 235 1 E
    post #161070
    105 153 2 Q
    post #161069
    151 230 1 E
    post #161012
    90 123 1 Q
    post #145806
    81 129 6 E

    Darn! This guy is a hot stuff.
    Would love to see him fuck and impregnate Nora or Chitsa.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #161097
    41 45 2 S

    Ooh, this look very good! I love the use of color here, her silhouette is so striking!

    Good job.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #161076
    174 249 1 E
    post #161023
    89 190 2 E
    post #139250
    68 105 1 Q
    post #161034
    317 534 3 E
    post #160804
    72 103 2 Q
    post #160903
    104 155 1 E
    post #160975
    155 246 1 E
    post #160996
    123 199 1 E
    post #161034
    317 534 3 E
    post #161064
    103 139 2 Q
    47 59 1 E
    post #161082
    98 124 2 E
    1 10 1 E

    Is this getting downvoted because it has issues that I don’t see or because of the content? There is a blacklist in your settings for content that you don’t like to see.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #131309
    126 187 3 E
    post #160937
    71 64 4 S
    post #160670
    48 84 1 E
    post #152992
    211 364 1 E
    post #161056
    65 83 1 E
    post #104471
    174 222 3 E
    post #160971
    71 100 2 E
    post #160970
    92 149 2 E
    post #160959
    28 64 1 E
    post #160957
    124 163 2 E
    post #160948
    211 361 1 E
    post #160944
    185 297 1 E

    I don't really mind broken anatomy like this, but that butt ain't quite connected to that torso in a realistic way

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160950
    277 459 2 E
    post #161064
    103 139 2 Q
    post #161013
    65 102 2 E
    post #161065
    103 159 1 E
    post #160921
    194 312 2 E
    post #161022
    121 199 1 E
    post #158453
    193 287 4 E

    As a professional Duchess appreciatior, I can confidently say that this is one of the best Duchess pictures ever. It really captures her character.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #161013
    65 102 2 E
    post #160934
    148 274 4 E
    post #159466
    201 279 2 E
    post #159604
    109 162 2 E

    badwolf1 said:
    only 4.4mb but the detail.
    Follicles and pussy skin texture and the tiny pussy hairs.
    Yea, and everything else but My focus is the pussy/ass.

    Thank you! Loving this compression for smaller files

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160896
    156 201 3 E

    zheneric said:
    Cute!
    The way her expression works despite the realism is really inpressive

    Thank you! I feel I need something like an expression lora to get them more consistent 😂

    khamal said:
    Oh my floof!!

    😂

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160997
    138 249 1 E
    post #160530
    313 529 3 E
    post #160069
    202 308 6 E
    post #160695
    13 29 1 Q
    post #161004
    147 243 1 E
    post #160978
    245 358 6 E

    I think it's a spectrum between truly non-sexual artistic nudity, erotica and pornography. This image is artistic but also erotic. I guess erotica is just a better name for what usually is called 'softcore porn'. Basically something featuring nudity and sex appeal but tastefully done and without genital closeups or sex.

    On the other hand a lot of imagery which is explicitly pornographic still has artistic principles applied in its creation for aesthetic appeal. So I guess it's more about the intention, whether or not the main aim is to create art or to titillate, that defines whether or not something is pornography or art.

    I guess based on that definition you could argue this image is porn, since based on the story it's placing the viewer in the place of a voyeur while the subject is enjoying being an exhibitionist.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160974
    43 39 4 S
    post #160891
    96 134 3 E
    post #160934
    148 274 4 E
    post #160891
    96 134 3 E
    post #55868
    65 127 6 E
    post #160978
    245 358 6 E
    post #160974
    43 39 4 S
    post #156655
    242 329 7 E