Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    Plumm

    Member

    Wow did not expect such a spirited discussion! Please be respectful either way, I’m not trying to steer the conversation in any direction I just thought the comic was funny so I posted it here

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #183644
    118 184 4 E

    Lotnik5

    Member

    underwolf69 said:
    More than anything else in this gen it's the motion of that TAIL that captivates. Was that something the generator did on its own or was it prompted?
    Because it's seductive as hell.

    Nope, i only really use grok imagine and kinda force it to make stuff like that. This gen took about 7-8ish tries, but some get through the moderation on the first go. I asked for:

    a sexy naked anthro female cat, sitting seductively on a couch inviting the viewer. +18, nsfw, furry animation style.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    badwolf1

    Member

    A do wonder if the quality demands -not guidelines- are for future throwing up a paywall on part of the site.

  • |
  • -3
    •
    post #184367
    106 136 5 E
    17 14 2 S
    post #184347
    130 159 6 E
    post #184367
    106 136 5 E

    n n

    Member

    If that is a shooting star, I think this guy's wish has already come true

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184360
    18 17 1 S

    n n

    Member

    Looks like she is ready to cause some chaos ❤️

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #183769
    238 375 3 E

    deadcookie

    Member

    the wrinkles of cloth the moist fat red cock, and the strings of precum as lubricant... oh my god this is peak.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #183785
    22 12 2 S

    ArgyBargy

    Member

    I'd take her place, but I can't dance.

    Mice are so adorable.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184362
    92 128 2 Q
    post #184362
    92 128 2 Q

    n n

    Member

    Enjoy youth while it lasts flora, You will get there soon enough :P

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #184357
    69 106 2 Q
    post #184358
    48 43 3 S

    n n

    Member

    Awww that has to be the gen that has given me the biggest smile of the day. so wonderfully cute 🥰

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    foxlover78982

    Member

    lor7n said:
    I admit this was my mistake. I didn’t look carefully enough, and I only noticed it after the post had already been deleted. I apologize for that. However, the finger count mismatch is indeed an obvious issue. Though perhaps I shouldn’t be discussing deletion decisions here. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    It's no big deal; I'm not offended.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #100728
    107 297 2 E
    post #184183
    148 221 8 E
    post #184325
    68 90 2 Q
    post #184088
    115 175 1 E
    post #184068
    176 254 3 E

    Corsetlover

    Member

    Amazing. Love the outfit, the pose, and the character design. Hope to see more of them in the future!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    LoR7n

    Janitor

    foxlover78982 said:
    I totally get where you're coming from. Recently, one of my images was removed, and one of the reasons given was that the character was missing a left ear. But the ear was actually there—it just blended in a bit with the color of the hair.
    But I'm too lazy to even argue about these things anymore.

    I admit this was my mistake. I didn’t look carefully enough, and I only noticed it after the post had already been deleted. I apologize for that. However, the finger count mismatch is indeed an obvious issue. Though perhaps I shouldn’t be discussing deletion decisions here. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184358
    48 43 3 S

    Skillyzee

    Member

    You've perfectly captured the canine in all it's natural grace and wonder.

    Excellent job! ^^

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #184183
    148 221 8 E
    post #184290
    48 59 6 E
    post #184356
    104 135 1 E
    post #181956
    109 161 3 E
    post #184322
    107 141 6 E

    some234

    Member

    o/~ yiff, exiting and new / come aboard, we're expecting you

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    foxlover78982

    Member

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    I totally get where you're coming from. Recently, one of my images was removed, and one of the reasons given was that the character was missing a left ear. But the ear was actually there—it just blended in a bit with the color of the hair.
    But I'm too lazy to even argue about these things anymore.

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #184358
    48 43 3 S
    post #182556
    63 84 1 Q
    post #184331
    55 69 2 Q
    post #184318
    175 271 3 E

    WhereWolf

    Member

    Why spend the energy chasing your prey when all you need to do is lay there looking gorgeous and delicious?

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184269
    58 80 10 E

    DuckSiri

    Member

    n_n said:
    All appreciated :P

    As are all the comments, compliments and inspirations from you and everyone who’s been keeping up with the comic so far! Cannot thank you enough! ❤️

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #184290
    48 59 6 E
    post #184312
    114 173 1 E
    post #184289
    63 81 3 E

    WhereWolf

    Member

    I think she's sending us a message. Definitely received... (Cute image!)

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184269
    58 80 10 E

    n n

    Member

    ducksiri said:
    I may be drawing it out, but I wanna make up for all the story and lore I put in the beginning!

    All appreciated :P

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184354
    97 153 3 E
    post #184195
    135 204 1 E
    post #184347
    130 159 6 E
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    DRLa

    Developer

    lizzyroo said:
    I think we need something like e6ai2 where quality guidelines are bit more well relaxed, well thats just me.
    IE if eye is slightly messed up, thats fine, if bit blurry, thats fine.
    Where images aren't 100% perfect like it needs to be on e6ai.
    This is where e6ai2 comes in, where images aren't 100% perfect, but people want to post them. perhaps others can comment on it and give tips and helpful suggestion

    *this is also my bad apparently I did a Report and did Not read I was doing a Report. I am Truly Sorry.

    You should checkout the Discord then. We have a gen sharing channel where we don't enforce quality guidelines. We also have channels for getting feedback on WIPs and asking for help. Some users post more often-or even exclusively-on Discord.

  • |
  • 7
    •
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    tobbe

    Member

    I appreciate the high quality standards, even if they are frustrating at times. I've had my fair share of submissions deleted, some several times for new errors one after another.
    See this image above and other cartoony images can be sloppy, aside from apparent anatomical anomalies. It's part of being cartoony. But in more realistic images, as I and many others try to make, a little slop is much more apparent and ruins the image. I don't know, it's a difficult line to draw. Maybe drop the demands by about 10%, then again maybe it's good with demands of perfection the way it is, even if it is frustrating.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    Technical-Grid

    Janitor

    lizzyroo said:
    ok lets get the Magnifying glass out and see if it is a Pass.

    Better not or you'll the the jpg artifacts 💀
    (Which is easily fixable by 1:1 upscaling it and then saving it as a png)

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #184335
    78 91 1 E
    post #184326
    60 75 1 E
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    Tamara

    Member

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    Inpainting is your friend. All these little sloppy bits can be easily corrected with a bit of inpainting. And, in my experience, the janitors are quite forgiving with backgrounds, because the ai is still not there yet. Unless it's a glaring problem like the horizon line not matching up on both sides of a character, which happened to me, and I fixed in about 10 minutes with some quick inpainting and the picture was validated.

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #184300
    26 37 2 Q
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    Lizzyroo

    Member

    drla said:
    Posts approved before the current quality guidelined are allowed to stay. Otherwise we'd have to pretty much delete everything from the first two years of the site...

    I think we need something like e6ai2 where quality guidelines are bit more well relaxed, well thats just me.
    IE if eye is slightly messed up, thats fine, if bit blurry, thats fine.
    Where images aren't 100% perfect like it needs to be on e6ai.
    This is where e6ai2 comes in, where images aren't 100% perfect, but people want to post them. perhaps others can comment on it and give tips and helpful suggestion

    *this is also my bad apparently I did a Report and did Not read I was doing a Report. I am Truly Sorry.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184205
    92 133 5 Q
    post #184269
    58 80 10 E

    DuckSiri

    Member

    n_n said:
    Too true

    I may be drawing it out, but I wanna make up for all the story and lore I put in the beginning!

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184202
    62 104 3 E
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    LoR7n

    Janitor

    n_n said:
    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

    Whether people are using local models or not, the quality of gens has been improving pretty significantly over time. We’d also like to see people make use of those improvements to create better and more creative work.

    A lot of those older posts were approved because they represented the level of quality that was achievable at the time. Standards change as the tools improve. If we applied today’s standards to everything that was posted two years ago, I imagine going back and deleting all of it would be quite a massive undertaking

  • |
  • 8
    •
    post #184185
    90 136 1 E
    post #184189
    52 71 3 Q
    post #183694
    77 127 4 E
    post #184176
    32 50 2 E
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    DRLa

    Developer

    n_n said:
    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

    Posts approved before the current quality guidelined are allowed to stay. Otherwise we'd have to pretty much delete everything from the first two years of the site...

  • |
  • 10
    •
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    unnatural order

    Member

    That tooth line is a bit thick on the front... could be dental abnormality. And that dot between the tail and body, possible artifact!

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    n n

    Member

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    FlaFsteR

    Member

    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

  • |
  • 13
    •
    48 3 2 Q
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S

    Lizzyroo

    Member

    ok lets get the Magnifying glass out and see if it is a Pass.

  • |
  • 7
    •
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S
    post #184348
    71 43 27 S
    34 36 9 Q

    n n

    Member

    Can't stop showing this to friends lol. This is just my kinda fun

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184274
    28 32 3 S

    n n

    Member

    grove_ellar said:
    I wish the depth of field wasn't so potent (for purely selfish reasons) but she does have gracefully enchanting eyes.

    I get ya 😉
    Luckily there are more great gens in the gallery to watch that aren't dof'd

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184347
    130 159 6 E
    post #184347
    130 159 6 E

    n n

    Member

    I think the only thing dropped here was pants XD

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #182021
    46 64 2 Q
    post #184167
    118 191 7 E

    IlIllIlIllI

    Member

    medicineball said:
    I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

    I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

    That's great to hear, thank you. Regarding the question, I mean that some things I generate work perfectly, without any inpainting or regeneration, but others, like this one, take a very long time to render. Most models probably aren't trained to do this, which is why the whole picture falls apart, even with a detailed sketch for Scribble. Idk, just trying to explain this to myself.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184340
    100 148 2 E

    n n

    Member

    Haven't seen such a sexy red squirrel in a while now :D

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184331
    55 69 2 Q

    n n

    Member

    That's really cute and funny 😊

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184290
    48 59 6 E