Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #184335
    73 85 1 E
    post #184326
    56 71 1 E
    post #184348
    64 39 24 S

    Tamara

    Member

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    Inpainting is your friend. All these little sloppy bits can be easily corrected with a bit of inpainting. And, in my experience, the janitors are quite forgiving with backgrounds, because the ai is still not there yet. Unless it's a glaring problem like the horizon line not matching up on both sides of a character, which happened to me, and I fixed in about 10 minutes with some quick inpainting and the picture was validated.

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #184300
    25 36 2 Q
    post #184348
    64 39 24 S

    Lizzyroo

    Member

    drla said:
    Posts approved before the current quality guidelined are allowed to stay. Otherwise we'd have to pretty much delete everything from the first two years of the site...

    I think we need something like e6ai2 where quality guidelines are bit more well relaxed, well thats just me.
    IE if eye is slightly messed up, thats fine, if bit blurry, thats fine.
    Where images aren't 100% perfect like it needs to be on e6ai.
    This is where e6ai2 comes in, where images aren't 100% perfect, but people want to post them. perhaps others can comment on it and give tips and helpful suggestion

    *this is also my bad apparently I did a Report and did Not read I was doing a Report. I am Truly Sorry.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184205
    83 120 5 Q
    post #184269
    52 75 10 E

    DuckSiri

    Member

    n_n said:
    Too true

    I may be drawing it out, but I wanna make up for all the story and lore I put in the beginning!

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184202
    55 91 3 E
    post #184348
    64 39 24 S

    LoR7n

    Janitor

    n_n said:
    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

    Whether people are using local models or not, the quality of gens has been improving pretty significantly over time. We’d also like to see people make use of those improvements to create better and more creative work.

    A lot of those older posts were approved because they represented the level of quality that was achievable at the time. Standards change as the tools improve. If we applied today’s standards to everything that was posted two years ago, I imagine going back and deleting all of it would be quite a massive undertaking

  • |
  • 7
    •
    post #184185
    84 128 1 E
    post #184189
    50 66 3 Q
    post #183694
    75 126 4 E
    post #184176
    32 48 2 E
    post #184348
    64 39 24 S

    DRLa

    Developer

    n_n said:
    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

    Posts approved before the current quality guidelined are allowed to stay. Otherwise we'd have to pretty much delete everything from the first two years of the site...

  • |
  • 9
    •
    post #184348
    64 39 24 S

    unnatural order

    Member

    That tooth line is a bit thick on the front... could be dental abnormality. And that dot between the tail and body, possible artifact!

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #184348
    64 39 24 S

    n n

    Member

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184348
    64 39 24 S

    FlaFsteR

    Member

    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

  • |
  • 12
    •
    48 3 2 Q
    post #184348
    64 39 24 S
    post #184348
    64 39 24 S
    post #184348
    64 39 24 S
    post #184348
    64 39 24 S
    34 36 9 Q

    n n

    Member

    Can't stop showing this to friends lol. This is just my kinda fun

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184274
    26 31 3 S

    n n

    Member

    grove_ellar said:
    I wish the depth of field wasn't so potent (for purely selfish reasons) but she does have gracefully enchanting eyes.

    I get ya 😉
    Luckily there are more great gens in the gallery to watch that aren't dof'd

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184347
    116 144 6 E
    post #184347
    116 144 6 E

    n n

    Member

    I think the only thing dropped here was pants XD

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #182021
    46 64 2 Q
    post #184167
    114 186 7 E

    IlIllIlIllI

    Member

    medicineball said:
    I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

    I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

    That's great to hear, thank you. Regarding the question, I mean that some things I generate work perfectly, without any inpainting or regeneration, but others, like this one, take a very long time to render. Most models probably aren't trained to do this, which is why the whole picture falls apart, even with a detailed sketch for Scribble. Idk, just trying to explain this to myself.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184340
    89 129 2 E

    n n

    Member

    Haven't seen such a sexy red squirrel in a while now :D

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184331
    48 62 2 Q

    n n

    Member

    That's really cute and funny 😊

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184290
    43 51 6 E
    post #184327
    125 196 3 E
    post #184324
    60 75 1 Q
    post #184300
    25 36 2 Q

    waywardneutrino

    Member

    A lot of Zoc's gens have this kind of subtle hint of fur texture that I absolutely adore: it gives just enough to impart a look of fuzzy softness without crossing into the territory of over-rendered, long rough fur. I must learn how to reproduce a similar effect by hand in Krita- it's so damn nice.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184318
    166 250 3 E
    post #184314
    45 89 2 E

    n n

    Member

    XD Ain't furry logic just the best? Girthy snake-balls and juicy peen complete with foreskin :P

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184303
    74 116 1 E

    n n

    Member

    Treat the lovely lady to some molerat kebabs ❤️

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184274
    26 31 3 S

    Grove Ellar

    Member

    n_n said:
    These closeups of precious kobold faces are such a treat ❤️

    I wish the depth of field wasn't so potent (for purely selfish reasons) but she does have gracefully enchanting eyes.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184028
    73 118 2 E

    Hammapajamma

    Member

    zheneric said:
    I might just "accidentally" trip and fall while appearing to steal some copper.

    Oh don't worry, I'm sure they'll help you get back up (after you get down), they're not bad sports.

    Only issue is that the law usually arrives before they get the chance to. Turns out a knot at each end is a pretty effective way of keeping a person detained. (°ー°〃)

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
    •
    34 36 9 Q
    post #184314
    45 89 2 E
    post #184219
    27 30 1 E
    post #184343
    89 122 2 E
    post #184167
    114 186 7 E

    medicineball

    Member

    ilillililli said:
    Btw... By looking at some works on the site I am feeling like I am using some sort of orchish technics. Some others having a more clean results. I've tried to switch between models, experimented with upscalers/without them... Still the result is much worse. What am I doing wrong?!

    I'm no expert in making these sort of things, but I do consume plenty. To my non-novice eye, there appears to be nothing wrong with what you have done here. Maybe I'm missing something, but the other comments seem to have my back on this. As for getting a score of only 82 (at the time of this posting), it's very likely down to taste, as most are not used to seeing mammaries in the location they are in here on an anthro. I appreciate your striving for great product, but give yourself some credit too. This is awesome!

    I'm a sucker for these romantic pieces.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184315
    79 107 1 E
    post #184318
    166 250 3 E
    post #184322
    98 124 5 E

    Commander

    Member

    She's obviously waiting for it... Don't keep her waiting.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184327
    125 196 3 E
    post #183675
    88 91 9 S

    TerraRaptor

    Privileged

    turtonturakon11 said:
    My first impression of them being extremelly cold, aloof, distant. I thought befriending with them is borderline impossible.

    Yeah, course correction, I may have overdone it in the earlier art. There is some of that, but ultimately, individuality still allows for all types.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #182817
    120 194 3 E
    post #183867
    67 65 10 E
    post #184292
    9 14 1 Q
    post #184288
    64 90 2 E
    post #184289
    60 75 3 E

    n n

    Member

    Well deserved 🥰 & bonus ear scratches

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184061
    13 11 1 S
    87 0 6 E
    34 36 9 Q
    post #183990
    141 200 2 E

    ZhenEric

    Member

    Because she always says yes (and is probably a great lover too)

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184028
    73 118 2 E

    ZhenEric

    Member

    I might just "accidentally" trip and fall while appearing to steal some copper.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184027
    78 70 4 Q

    ZhenEric

    Member

    She'd give the best hugs bar none.

    She definitely looks more feline. What species did you have in mind?

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #183890
    25 16 5 S
    post #184024
    62 70 2 E
    post #184112
    142 226 3 E
    post #184109
    229 351 6 E

    ZhenEric

    Member

    Rare, but much appreciated, is the fully fluffy pussy

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184180
    73 103 1 E
    post #184202
    55 91 3 E
    post #184234
    119 195 2 E
    post #184285
    45 71 1 E
    post #184287
    88 113 4 E

    ZhenEric

    Member

    Pawless socks will always result in a good night for her

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #184288
    64 90 2 E
    87 0 6 E
    34 36 9 Q
    post #184286
    27 34 2 E
    34 36 9 Q
    post #184222
    115 172 1 E