Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #176935
    77 62 11 S

    My sense is this. What we call anthropomorphic foxes or horses or dogs or cats or other such bipedal beings that populate this site aren't anthropomorphic animals, but are zoomorphic humans. In other words, humans that have been altered to have traits similar to some cute (or sexy) animals. If you look at them you can tell the base being is human, so I don't think the subject couple is in violation of Leviticus ch 18.

    On another note, aside from mostly being about not having sex with relatives, Leviticus ch 18 also forbids you from having sex with a girl who's mensurating... Come on! We've all gotten drunk with our significant other at the wrong time of the month and the only harm was to our sheets! *sigh* Take it as you will.

    Love the romantic pieces like this on this site.

  • |
  • 4
  • post #152658
    114 177 5 E

    lolingtons77 said:
    I'm sorry, i didnt see this until way later looking back on old posts. If you do manage to see this, i made the Lora myslef.

    Ah, okay. I thought I could find it online. It came out really well 😉

  • |
  • 0
  • post #176974
    51 56 4 E

    srmalloy said:
    It's Natasha that has the 'cutouts' in the white markings on her face, not Lori; see https://e621.net/posts/1288361 with, left to right, Lori, Onyx, and Natasha.

    I know exactly what the three sisters look like—I've been familiar with Hardiman's art since 2007—but it's hard to get the AI to follow instructions and replicate a fur pattern 100%. I think I managed to get pretty close, though!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #174926
    112 186 3 E
    post #167377
    111 175 4 E

    nxghtfxrry said:
    You must log in with an account or email address
    to view explicit content,
    and also adjust your browsing level.

    does civetai still work without a billion limitations? I had a login and it went through some BS that would not lemme do a LOT of things u see on here.. and you had credits you get and run out of quickly..

    broken AF sometimes RN but I been using perchance.org and just google NSFW perchance.org or unlimited perchance.org because they have like 1000's of pages of different style generators some good other really bad but u eventually find a decent few & swap between them when the AI wants to be stuck on stupid...

  • |
  • 0
  • post #175734
    54 84 1 E
    post #177085
    121 155 1 E
    post #174197
    146 182 2 E

    Wow, a new meaning to sexy Bitch.. very nice, may I use this & try make her using realism commands in prompt? I always ask first & give dues to original creator..

    you will have to post original prompt, this tag soup of what looks like html and prompting language will not work in any of the generators I use, I am using Flux usually flux 2 klein "when it wants to work" and use a storyline style prompting or with curly braces when it really wants to be a pain in my ass..

  • |
  • 0
  • post #169422
    137 223 5 E

    tammy said:
    never enough kitty stuff, in my opinion

    Mee-Owe when he puts it in LOL, great video, never seen green pussy (pun)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #174977
    122 187 8 E

    stephanieraccoon said:
    I had about maybe... 10 or so clips that came out of Seedance for this scene and I tried editing them together in a dozen different ways, some of them she looks crazy happy some she looks quite upset, my fault I guess on not being specific enough with the prompting - but with all the variations on the edits I tried i found the smoothest least jarring and most natural looking edit I came up with uses the closeup where she looks upset, thus as I said in the description this version feels a lot more rapey. I'd love to build the scene out more and get something closer to what was in my head when I started but I am sadly not made of tokens and I don't have enough excess cash to buy more right now so for now I'm stuck recutting a habd full of clips like Marge Simpson altering that same pink Chanel dress over and over

    Was she upset? or did she get her cherry popped? at least that's what I took from it, this Was WOW and Amazing video.. I was wondering are you using a website and paying for the extra time for video or do you have your own program that can do it? I have some very wild AI made images "before site I used went to hell & keeps breaking everything" and wanted to know if you would do a collab? I can do up to 10 seconds on a free but have No clue how to make it continue from last scene and have a finishing scene for video's, I only know how to do till image generations & kinda know how to animate them using the site..

    You can contact me on DM or this relay mail: 66gmjr63j@mozmail.com Thanks for your time :)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177025
    131 126 20 E

    blake81 said:
    Been wondering for some time, do you write all these yourself or use an AI as well?

    That's mostly human. I say "mostly" cause I run my text thru spelling and grammar check, which is AI, and sometimes it'll suggest a cleaner or more coherent way to phrase something. Or if I'm struggling with coming up with a made up, invented word (For instance "obdurite" mentioned on post #159340), I may ask for plausible suggestions. A lot of my picts start out with a lore draft, and the associated pict comes later. Raegul, for instance, has been an internal footnote for awhile before being featured.

    Updated

  • |
  • 4
  • post #176068
    137 178 5 E
    post #177053
    38 59 4 E
    post #176974
    51 56 4 E
    post #149104
    201 322 1 Q
    post #177106
    79 118 1 E
    post #177108
    83 128 2 Q
    post #176895
    80 98 9 Q
    post #176935
    77 62 11 S

    renegadec said:
    there is likely some humanoid DNA in the makeup.

    I imagine she gets a healthy dose of human DNA quite often.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #177058
    132 192 3 E

    Perfect physique on that sly fox. :3

    Your Nick is fantastic. Very nice work!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #177089
    64 86 1 E

    How'd you know cookies in panties were my thing? <3

  • |
  • 1
  • post #177053
    38 59 4 E

    slyly1997 said:
    Wow, you certainly came out with a fury of fantastic embarrassed nude shots. Hopefully these ones will stay. Have the last few you’ve done been deleted by you, or the mods?

    Moderator

  • |
  • 1
  • post #176811
    129 227 2 E

    lickit69 said:
    How to train your dragon? Or the proper way to train your dragon?

    Who says the human is doing the training?

  • |
  • 1
  • post #176972
    18 15 10 S

    jjjjj88888 said:
    Bienvenido! Me encantan las zorrillas! Siempre lindas, hermosas y muy sexy!

    Gracias por el saludo amigo! Si, las otras mofetas en el fandom son hermosas pero todas palidecen frente al trio skunkworks, sin mencionar a su madre! XD

  • |
  • 1
  • post #176935
    77 62 11 S

    mercrantos said:
    I would say she is in animal in the biological sense, in that she is obviously not human, but she is clearly a person in the same way the man next to her is. If anthros existed they would be deserving of the same rights humans have but we don't really need to worry about this in the real world.

    A chimera if anything.If she is bipedal with tool using hands then there is likely some humanoid DNA in the makeup. Also, the hair ( not fur ) she is sporting is another humanoid trait.

    And no, not something to worry about. Yet...
    Do not discount that mankind has a nasty habit of trying to play God.

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #176029
    104 141 9 E
    post #175870
    54 42 4 Q
    post #173387
    56 107 1 E
    post #176972
    18 15 10 S

    Bienvenido! Me encantan las zorrillas! Siempre lindas, hermosas y muy sexy!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #177098
    79 130 3 E
    post #177098
    79 130 3 E
    post #177032
    88 132 1 E
    post #177091
    100 159 2 E

    The only appropriate use for foxes.

    And 'rarely taken care of'? Werewolf ass gets eaten all the time.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #176925
    135 169 2 E

    zheneric said:
    Ohhh yeah here we go! Cheek squish, shaft lick, and call fondling, Warning clearly knows what she's doing

    ultimate cock worship

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177100
    8 5 1 S
    post #177099
    103 165 1 E
    54 82 1 E
    57 87 1 E
    post #126508
    105 155 2 E

    C32

    Member

    Nooooooooooo dont gooo :( you are honestly the best at making unconventionally attractive creatures

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177075
    32 54 2 E
    post #177047
    36 44 1 S
    post #177081
    127 221 1 E
    post #151982
    345 546 3 E

    The tigers hip thrusts when the horses flare rakes over his prostate is *chefs kiss*

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177090
    149 236 1 E
    post #176935
    77 62 11 S

    renegadec said:
    I have to question this. She is obviously sentient, has demonstrable cognition ( a book in her hands ) and is self aware ( yes, she is enjoying her coffee, tea, whatever ) and apparently able to understand / communicate with her companion. So, by the conventional meaning is she an animal? Anthropomorphism and genetic modification seems to change the rules.

    I would say she is in animal in the biological sense, in that she is obviously not human, but she is clearly a person in the same way the man next to her is. If anthros existed they would be deserving of the same rights humans have but we don't really need to worry about this in the real world.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #177025
    131 126 20 E

    Been wondering for some time, do you write all these yourself or use an AI as well?

  • |
  • 1
  • post #177046
    80 98 2 E

    shblue said:
    Reminds me of this YT rec I keep getting of Brian Swords pieces auctioned live on WITF-TV in 1988. Anyway, cute! Can't say murid without murr~

    Very true actually!!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #176935
    77 62 11 S

    renegadec said:
    I have to question this. She is obviously sentient, has demonstrable cognition ( a book in her hands ) and is self aware ( yes, she is enjoying her coffee, tea, whatever ) and apparently able to understand / communicate with her companion. So, by the conventional meaning is she an animal? Anthropomorphism and genetic modification seems to change the rules.

    I'd say no.
    Even by baseline logic, if someone says "animal", the first thing that probably will come to your mind, is a four-legged being that eats off the ground, and bolts (or attacks) the moment it sees you, not someONE clothed, drinking from a cup, and saying "hello" spotting you.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #177080
    179 268 1 E
    18 23 1 S
    post #177027
    153 250 2 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    Moans could sound a bit more like a cinderace. Just saying.

    Yeah, I used a general audio software :/

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177025
    131 126 20 E

    I'm loving the bird on the left. Cute colors and very sexy body with the curvy hips.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #176829
    72 91 4 E
    post #177053
    38 59 4 E

    Wow, you certainly came out with a fury of fantastic embarrassed nude shots. Hopefully these ones will stay. Have the last few you’ve done been deleted by you, or the mods?

  • |
  • 3
  • post #176969
    153 249 3 E
    post #175987
    119 185 9 E

    Phew. Lol. And which of these two actually came up with the idea of comparing penis and ball sizes? And what was Fennec even expecting, considering Nick is taller and bigger than him? Accordingly, if Nick is bigger and taller, then his penis and balls will be larger than Fennec's. Doesn't that make sense?! But I still really want to know which of the two of them was the first to suggest making peace with their sizes and why?

  • |
  • 2
  • post #176989
    5 8 1 E

    "Since the beginning of time, man has yearned to destroy the sun. I will do the next best thing: block it out." xD

  • |
  • 1
  • post #177065
    73 123 1 E
    post #176935
    77 62 11 S

    I have to question this. She is obviously sentient, has demonstrable cognition ( a book in her hands ) and is self aware ( yes, she is enjoying her coffee, tea, whatever ) and apparently able to understand / communicate with her companion. So, by the conventional meaning is she an animal? Anthropomorphism and genetic modification seems to change the rules.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #177040
    65 89 1 S
    post #177048
    48 61 1 E
    post #176964
    48 74 1 E
    post #177025
    131 126 20 E
    post #177025
    131 126 20 E
    post #176972
    18 15 10 S

    maverick039 said:
    Primero: BRUTAL

    Segundo: Que ricas están esas zorrillas, son una de las razones que me volví furro.

    Ellas fueron el inicio en el fandom de muchos!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177025
    131 126 20 E

    dews41 said:
    Also, you know this soldier means business when she wears armor on her groin.

    Hah, well, that one's a male (as is the tutor). But given my track record with posting female anthros and the minimal sexual dimorphism, the mixup was expected. I tried to give the females a curvier figure and the whole eyelash thing to give some subtle visual cues, at least.

    To add to the confusion, in Midrian lore, the trili are among the more likely of species to join their female counterparts in bottomless fashion (such as the tutor there).

  • |
  • 3
  • post #168693
    144 190 3 E
    post #176974
    51 56 4 E
    post #176972
    18 15 10 S

    Primero: BRUTAL

    Segundo: Que ricas están esas zorrillas, son una de las razones que me volví furro.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #177046
    80 98 2 E

    Reminds me of this YT rec I keep getting of Brian Swords pieces auctioned live on WITF-TV in 1988. Anyway, cute! Can't say murid without murr~

  • |
  • 1
  • post #177025
    131 126 20 E

    This is awesome! I love the little details. The characters, the weapons, the ornamentation; it’s gorgeous! It’s this kind of art that keeps me coming back to E6AI.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #177025
    131 126 20 E

    Love this exchange xD
    Also, you know this soldier means business when she wears armor on her groin. The lovely picture overall, so many pretty borbs.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #176946
    184 264 3 E
    post #144950
    108 193 1 E
    post #177004
    243 397 2 E