Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #145806
    104 154 6 E

    Darn! This guy is a hot stuff.
    Would love to see him fuck and impregnate Nora or Chitsa.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #161097
    54 56 2 S

    Ooh, this look very good! I love the use of color here, her silhouette is so striking!

    Good job.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #161076
    187 271 1 E
    102 208 2 E
    post #139250
    67 108 1 Q
    post #161034
    413 709 3 E
    post #160804
    83 120 2 Q

    horsefucker5 said:
    You seem to be dealing with some static cling, miss

    It would be quite easy to relieve her from such a... serious problem...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160903
    119 191 1 E
    post #160975
    193 311 1 E
    post #160996
    141 234 1 E
    post #161034
    413 709 3 E
    post #161064
    114 160 2 Q
    47 59 1 E
    post #161082
    111 146 2 E

    I recognise this Isabelle.
    Incredible how well AI can recreate even 3D render styles

  • |
  • 7
  • 1 9 1 E

    Is this getting downvoted because it has issues that I don’t see or because of the content? There is a blacklist in your settings for content that you don’t like to see.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #131309
    130 191 3 E
    post #160937
    82 75 4 S
    post #160670
    53 89 1 E
    post #152992
    236 399 1 E
    post #161056
    72 94 1 E
    post #104471
    186 240 3 E
    post #160971
    93 134 2 E
    97 153 2 E

    Insanely hot, but you can see both rows of teeth, showing that her mouth is closed

  • |
  • 4
  • post #160959
    34 69 1 E
    post #160957
    130 179 3 E
    post #160948
    248 431 1 E
    post #160944
    209 339 1 E

    I don't really mind broken anatomy like this, but that butt ain't quite connected to that torso in a realistic way

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160950
    324 556 4 E
    post #161064
    114 160 2 Q
    post #161013
    87 147 2 E
    post #161065
    132 203 1 E
    post #160921
    248 416 2 E
    post #161022
    140 243 1 E

    Woah! Back with a vengeance! Please tell there is more on the way because these are juicy.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #158453
    205 322 4 E

    As a professional Duchess appreciatior, I can confidently say that this is one of the best Duchess pictures ever. It really captures her character.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #161013
    87 147 2 E
    post #160934
    162 290 4 E
    post #159466
    237 349 2 E

    zheneric said:
    She really is a cat. Rolling around cutely while lying in a sunny spot on a soft couch

    😂

  • |
  • 1
  • post #159604
    131 225 2 E

    badwolf1 said:
    only 4.4mb but the detail.
    Follicles and pussy skin texture and the tiny pussy hairs.
    Yea, and everything else but My focus is the pussy/ass.

    Thank you! Loving this compression for smaller files

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160896
    184 262 3 E

    zheneric said:
    Cute!
    The way her expression works despite the realism is really inpressive

    Thank you! I feel I need something like an expression lora to get them more consistent 😂

    khamal said:
    Oh my floof!!

    😂

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160997
    160 275 1 E
    post #160530
    408 677 3 E
    post #160069
    264 409 6 E
    post #160695
    20 36 1 Q
    167 276 1 E
    post #160978
    275 406 6 E

    I think it's a spectrum between truly non-sexual artistic nudity, erotica and pornography. This image is artistic but also erotic. I guess erotica is just a better name for what usually is called 'softcore porn'. Basically something featuring nudity and sex appeal but tastefully done and without genital closeups or sex.

    On the other hand a lot of imagery which is explicitly pornographic still has artistic principles applied in its creation for aesthetic appeal. So I guess it's more about the intention, whether or not the main aim is to create art or to titillate, that defines whether or not something is pornography or art.

    I guess based on that definition you could argue this image is porn, since based on the story it's placing the viewer in the place of a voyeur while the subject is enjoying being an exhibitionist.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160974
    49 48 4 S

    Wish had gotten something like this rather than the dreck that was HW3

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160891
    115 162 3 E
    post #160934
    162 290 4 E
    post #160891
    115 162 3 E
    post #55868
    72 135 6 E
    post #160978
    275 406 6 E
    post #160974
    49 48 4 S
    post #156655
    259 354 8 E
    post #160992
    8 48 10 E

    I'd argue Evangelion has a broader message of if we have empathy with each other we may be able to reduce everyone's suffering or at least not contribute to it.

    She's gorgeous and her voice sounds smooth by the way.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160766
    71 83 1 S
    post #120318
    95 186 1 E

    I like how the "shiny"-ness is more than JUST a palette swap: he's actually shiny!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160957
    130 179 3 E
    post #160950
    324 556 4 E
    post #160214
    251 440 4 E
    38 25 2 Q

    okt said:
    Someday I'll know how a tattoo can be seen under the fur. Beautiful art, though.

    This is the first time I've seen something like this that's really well done.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160895
    194 306 3 E
    38 25 2 Q

    Okt

    Member

    Someday I'll know how a tattoo can be seen under the fur. Beautiful art, though.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160946
    192 383 1 E
    post #160978
    275 406 6 E
    post #160978
    275 406 6 E

    Okt

    Member

    Pornography is defined by the obsession over close ups of genital parts. Eroticism does not, or not that intensely. That's why the genital parts of a Greek statue was smooth for a woman, and small for a man. It was a non sexualized nudity. Vulgarity and obscenity also define pornography, but those are relative values now.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160978
    275 406 6 E
    post #160978
    275 406 6 E

    I agree, the line is the intent. Something like this pic is definitely artistic nudity and not pornography, because I don't believe it's meant to be sexual and instead showcase beauty, which it does VERY well!

    Also, she looks very tasteful! 😉

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160942
    80 116 1 E
    post #160696
    565 1.0k 6 E

    nosuitnosoul said:
    So good~ ❤️‍🔥 But it is a little depressing that while Pokemon are obviously willing and emotionally mature enough to be partners with normal humans... if they have a choice they'd still like to get with ripped supermodels. 😑

    😦

  • |
  • 3
  • post #160925
    20 17 1 S
    post #160941
    94 113 4 S

    mikubraver said:
    Looks like Dracaena_(bnbigus).

    Oh no! My bad, my error, gonna fix it now. Thank you for poiting this out.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160936
    59 55 2 S
    post #160873
    45 69 1 E
    post #160927
    76 115 1 Q
    post #158255
    228 393 4 E