Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #160304
    90 122 1 E
    post #141808
    256 444 6 E

    harroden said:
    I still can't get whether this is sarcasm or not. Is there some way to check metadata that I don't know about or have missed somehow?

    It is not sarcasm! You can download the video and drag it onto a ComfyUI window to see the workflow and resources I used. The same is true of any video or image with the Prompt Metainfo tag.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #161037
    92 132 1 Q
    post #161088
    48 72 2 Q
    post #161073
    172 272 1 E
    post #161070
    112 165 2 Q
    post #161069
    181 275 1 E
    post #161012
    113 153 1 Q
    post #145806
    104 154 6 E

    Darn! This guy is a hot stuff.
    Would love to see him fuck and impregnate Nora or Chitsa.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #161097
    53 55 2 S

    Ooh, this look very good! I love the use of color here, her silhouette is so striking!

    Good job.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #161076
    187 269 1 E
    102 208 2 E
    post #139250
    67 108 1 Q
    post #161034
    413 709 3 E
    post #160804
    83 120 2 Q

    horsefucker5 said:
    You seem to be dealing with some static cling, miss

    It would be quite easy to relieve her from such a... serious problem...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160903
    119 191 1 E
    post #160975
    192 310 1 E
    post #160996
    141 234 1 E
    post #161034
    413 709 3 E
    post #161064
    113 160 2 Q
    47 59 1 E
    post #161082
    111 146 2 E

    I recognise this Isabelle.
    Incredible how well AI can recreate even 3D render styles

  • |
  • 7
  • 1 9 1 E

    Is this getting downvoted because it has issues that I don’t see or because of the content? There is a blacklist in your settings for content that you don’t like to see.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #131309
    130 191 3 E
    post #160937
    82 75 4 S
    post #160670
    53 89 1 E
    post #152992
    235 398 1 E
    post #161056
    72 94 1 E
    post #104471
    186 240 3 E
    post #160971
    93 134 2 E
    97 153 2 E

    Insanely hot, but you can see both rows of teeth, showing that her mouth is closed

  • |
  • 4
  • post #160959
    34 69 1 E
    post #160957
    130 179 3 E
    post #160948
    247 429 1 E
    post #160944
    208 338 1 E

    I don't really mind broken anatomy like this, but that butt ain't quite connected to that torso in a realistic way

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160950
    321 552 4 E
    post #161064
    113 160 2 Q
    post #161013
    87 147 2 E
    post #161065
    132 203 1 E
    post #160921
    248 415 2 E
    post #161022
    140 243 1 E

    Woah! Back with a vengeance! Please tell there is more on the way because these are juicy.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #158453
    205 322 4 E

    As a professional Duchess appreciatior, I can confidently say that this is one of the best Duchess pictures ever. It really captures her character.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #161013
    87 147 2 E
    post #160934
    162 290 4 E
    post #159466
    236 347 2 E

    zheneric said:
    She really is a cat. Rolling around cutely while lying in a sunny spot on a soft couch

    😂

  • |
  • 1
  • post #159604
    129 222 2 E

    badwolf1 said:
    only 4.4mb but the detail.
    Follicles and pussy skin texture and the tiny pussy hairs.
    Yea, and everything else but My focus is the pussy/ass.

    Thank you! Loving this compression for smaller files

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160896
    184 261 3 E

    zheneric said:
    Cute!
    The way her expression works despite the realism is really inpressive

    Thank you! I feel I need something like an expression lora to get them more consistent 😂

    khamal said:
    Oh my floof!!

    😂

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160997
    158 273 1 E
    post #160530
    407 676 3 E
    post #160069
    262 408 6 E
    post #160695
    20 36 1 Q
    167 276 1 E
    post #160978
    275 406 6 E

    I think it's a spectrum between truly non-sexual artistic nudity, erotica and pornography. This image is artistic but also erotic. I guess erotica is just a better name for what usually is called 'softcore porn'. Basically something featuring nudity and sex appeal but tastefully done and without genital closeups or sex.

    On the other hand a lot of imagery which is explicitly pornographic still has artistic principles applied in its creation for aesthetic appeal. So I guess it's more about the intention, whether or not the main aim is to create art or to titillate, that defines whether or not something is pornography or art.

    I guess based on that definition you could argue this image is porn, since based on the story it's placing the viewer in the place of a voyeur while the subject is enjoying being an exhibitionist.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #160974
    49 48 4 S

    Wish had gotten something like this rather than the dreck that was HW3

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160891
    115 162 3 E
    post #160934
    162 290 4 E
    post #160891
    115 162 3 E
    post #55868
    70 132 6 E
    post #160978
    275 406 6 E
    post #160974
    49 48 4 S
    post #156655
    258 352 8 E
    post #160992
    8 48 10 E

    I'd argue Evangelion has a broader message of if we have empathy with each other we may be able to reduce everyone's suffering or at least not contribute to it.

    She's gorgeous and her voice sounds smooth by the way.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160766
    71 83 1 S
    post #120318
    95 186 1 E

    I like how the "shiny"-ness is more than JUST a palette swap: he's actually shiny!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160957
    130 179 3 E
    post #160950
    321 552 4 E
    post #160214
    251 439 4 E
    38 25 2 Q

    okt said:
    Someday I'll know how a tattoo can be seen under the fur. Beautiful art, though.

    This is the first time I've seen something like this that's really well done.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160895
    194 306 3 E
    38 25 2 Q

    Okt

    Member

    Someday I'll know how a tattoo can be seen under the fur. Beautiful art, though.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #160946
    192 383 1 E
    post #160978
    275 406 6 E
    post #160978
    275 406 6 E

    Okt

    Member

    Pornography is defined by the obsession over close ups of genital parts. Eroticism does not, or not that intensely. That's why the genital parts of a Greek statue was smooth for a woman, and small for a man. It was a non sexualized nudity. Vulgarity and obscenity also define pornography, but those are relative values now.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #160978
    275 406 6 E
    post #160978
    275 406 6 E

    I agree, the line is the intent. Something like this pic is definitely artistic nudity and not pornography, because I don't believe it's meant to be sexual and instead showcase beauty, which it does VERY well!

    Also, she looks very tasteful! 😉

  • |
  • 2