Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #169878
    37 24 3 S

    Underwolf69

    Member

    the punch line is hilarious and number 34 had best run as fast as he can.

    What I find impressive is that the gen is getting lip movements - on *non-human* characters - down good enough you could just about lip-read them.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #169921
    39 30 13 S

    Underwolf69

    Member

    bahufaru said:
    As I work with Google Gemini, I have reached a point where I can feed it multiple reference images and detailed descriptions, have it ingest them all and produce a pretty good model, and then send that to the animation pipeline, including dialogue lines and directions for voice types and accents.

    The prompting for this wasn't particularly difficult, and it's in natural language, basically just "Animate Kafeel Scirocco chopping vegetables in a school cafeteria kitchen, in a photorealistic style similar to student video productions. Have him regard the viewer and say, in his Sudanese accent, "My name is Kafeel Scirocco. It is my jobs to nourishes the hungries.""

    The real work is in the significant amount of reference images and concept text, character explaining, etc, that went into reaching a point where Gemini fully understood the on-model design of the character and could fully understand what "Kafeel Scirocco" means, conceptually and visually.

    The nice thing is that once that work is done, my instance of Gemini reliably produces media of the character, because it understands what the character is and what he should look and sound like.

    You should create an instructional video of this process for us know-nothings (and for me it's even less than nothing) so we might be able to create established characters of our own to work with.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #169784
    249 386 3 E
    post #170008
    247 379 10 E

    ZhenEric

    Member

    furryranch said:
    But how does she have a picture, of the picture we're looking at??

    And a picture of the picture within it!

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #170080
    348 552 7 E
    post #170091
    61 67 6 E

    ZhenEric

    Member

    Hitoner has sky-rocketed to become one of my favourite on-going series

  • |
  • 2
    •
    8 12 2 E

    RenegadeC

    Member

    No, it's not quite Mila but she is cute and quite good in her own right!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    125 206 2 E

    Pyrodelic

    Member

    Oh come on! That watermark is just TOO intrusive right there. (I only complain because I love it.)

  • |
  • 6
    •
    post #169997
    95 136 1 E
    post #150464
    85 160 6 E

    Tigerpile

    Member

    Ah yes, the completely debunked myth that people refuse to let die. Yeah, there are similarities. No, it was not a copy, a ripoff, or anything like what this poster claims.

    In 1994, Takayuki Matsutani, the president of Osamu Tezuka’s production company Tezuka Productions, said:

    Quite a few staff of our company saw a preview of “The Lion King,” discussed this subject and came to the conclusion that you cannot avoid having these similarities as long as you use animals as characters and try to draw images out of them.

    Quote is from Huffpost but I've seen it other places too, that was just the easiest to find with a search.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #148480
    82 100 3 S
    post #170043
    6 4 1 Q
    post #170093
    114 141 1 S

    n n

    Member

    Oh yes! more of the super adorable husky ❤️❤️❤️ :D Thank you!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #163492
    68 42 6 S

    foxntail

    Member

    dodgey_roger said:
    What about the male fox not having a tail at all? Lol

    I didn’t even notice that fox tail on the horse until people pointed it out in the comments. And as for the male fox… let’s just imagine that his tail hangs to the right, i.e. behind his body :)

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #123484
    326 542 1 E
    post #170039
    92 151 1 E

    Makai

    Member

    Wow, super picture—awesome! Is it possible to get this in the "mega" form too? Only if you can, of course. ^^

  • |
  • 3
    •
    8 12 2 E

    Daraix

    Member

    I think she is hinting at something. I need to continue observing some more of this behavior

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #145288
    26 16 4 S
    post #167801
    43 48 4 S
    post #169987
    106 109 3 S
    post #169989
    82 116 10 Q
    post #170025
    73 107 2 E
    post #169290
    111 180 1 E
    post #118486
    153 298 1 E
    post #170044
    22 23 1 S
    post #151633
    50 34 9 S
    40 42 1 E
    7 12 1 E
    post #170053
    148 253 4 E
    13 13 2 Q
    post #170057
    27 52 1 E
    post #170065
    297 486 2 E
    post #170080
    348 552 7 E
    post #170086
    93 143 1 E
    post #167819
    169 331 1 E
    post #170013
    21 17 2 S
    post #170080
    348 552 7 E
    post #170069
    5 16 2 S
    post #170063
    155 234 3 E
    post #170063
    155 234 3 E
    post #164364
    0 6 1 E
    28 28 1 E
    post #170055
    36 26 2 S
    post #167340
    302 514 1 E
    post #163492
    68 42 6 S
    post #170033
    64 84 1 S

    n n

    Member

    ❤️🐺 Hunks like these don't even have to ask

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #163623
    78 145 4 E

    dodgey roger

    Member

    Only OG’s remember when dithering like this was necessary for systems limited to 16-bit color, limited space to store images, or limited bandwidth to load them (think 56kbps or less). This would look so silky smooth on a CRT.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #170030
    159 258 1 E
    post #170023
    145 224 1 E
    post #170020
    44 68 2 E
    post #167720
    272 449 7 E

    Tempting

    Member

    lionxld said:
    So you used Photoshop to stitch them together in post-production?

    You can do that or blob them in with any art program (ms paint is enough) and a couple of moderate-denoise inpaints to preserve a pose/composition. I mostly do the latter, but either way the last step is a soft inpainting pass to minimize stitches/halos. If you need anything else feel free to pm me.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #152947
    34 19 3 S
    post #165330
    35 49 2 E
    post #155685
    452 770 8 E
    post #166256
    17 24 4 S
    post #170017
    231 403 6 E
    post #157687
    280 466 9 Q
    post #170062
    147 249 3 E

    Avens

    Member

    is this the musky gamer-girl wolf waifu the future has promised us?

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #166204
    33 12 2 S

    Bahufaru

    Member

    Your stuff is so good, it's so lovely the breath of fresh air you bring. :)

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #170080
    348 552 7 E
    post #169921
    39 30 13 S
    post #168645
    34 51 1 E

    dodgey roger

    Member

    Honestly the redesign makes way more sense for the character description than the original design. Pretty girls who have time to groom and care for their appearance don’t work as solo mercenaries sleeping in the cockpit of their ships for whom more than basic hygiene is a luxury.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #170080
    348 552 7 E
    post #170054
    24 27 1 S
    post #169724
    205 330 1 E
    post #169743
    62 51 3 S
    post #169744
    43 46 6 Q
    post #169774
    24 33 3 S
    post #169820
    266 430 6 E
    post #169921
    39 30 13 S

    GoldAnthroWolf

    Member

    Wow.. now that is utterly impressive! I also used Gemini, but I only got the medium level teir, mostly for storage and all that. I'll have to play around, get some more info!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    73 100 2 E
    post #170063
    155 234 3 E
    post #170062
    147 249 3 E
    post #170042
    80 119 2 Q

    Blackwoof

    Member

    squishface said:
    Well done Vader-sa er uh I mean Vartasaur

    I kinda get the hate for AI when it's obvious which artist's work got scraped for the models.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #170037
    103 163 1 E