Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #183499
    143 208 1 E
    post #184158
    91 105 5 E

    Den36

    Member

    На самом деле это офигенный концепт для секс-андроида, особенно если живот сделать мягким, как, собственно, человеческий живот.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184375
    36 42 2 E
    post #184291
    17 14 2 S
    post #184388
    43 62 6 E
    post #184385
    39 36 2 E

    TotallyNotABox

    Member

    I know what you're thinking, but I won't tell anyone~

    That dino chicken nuggets are the best chicken nuggets? I don’t mind if you tell.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184392
    7 3 1 S
    post #184375
    36 42 2 E
    post #184336
    73 111 2 E
    post #184388
    43 62 6 E
    post #184367
    57 73 5 E
    post #184388
    43 62 6 E
    post #184366
    44 56 3 E

    qwenker

    Member

    nerothunderfox said:
    Is it possible to see the last picture somewhere else?

    That would be awesome if so X3

    Unfortunately not. There was an imgbox, but it's gone now. Linking it would be against da rules anyway I assume, otherwise I could just post a catbox link in the description. Already asked about uploading it here with the babies censored like a japanese vagina, nope.

    I quite like the picture, but it's nothing impressive and you're not missing much that's not in the description. Kinda ruins the breast_envy conclusion tho

    Edit: Actually the post which made me think it couldn't be linked has a link anyway and from a quick skim of the rules I don't see why this non-sexual image couldn't be linked so here it is. If it gets removed, so be it.

    https://files.catbox.moe/hjeixe.png

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184159
    45 84 1 E
    post #184366
    44 56 3 E
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    Plumm

    Member

    Wow did not expect such a spirited discussion! Please be respectful either way, I’m not trying to steer the conversation in any direction I just thought the comic was funny so I posted it here

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #183644
    117 180 4 E

    Lotnik5

    Member

    underwolf69 said:
    More than anything else in this gen it's the motion of that TAIL that captivates. Was that something the generator did on its own or was it prompted?
    Because it's seductive as hell.

    Nope, i only really use grok imagine and kinda force it to make stuff like that. This gen took about 7-8ish tries, but some get through the moderation on the first go. I asked for:

    a sexy naked anthro female cat, sitting seductively on a couch inviting the viewer. +18, nsfw, furry animation style.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    badwolf1

    Member

    A do wonder if the quality demands -not guidelines- are for future throwing up a paywall on part of the site.

  • |
  • -2
    •
    post #184367
    57 73 5 E
    post #184291
    17 14 2 S
    post #184347
    94 109 6 E
    post #184367
    57 73 5 E

    n n

    Member

    If that is a shooting star, I think this guy's wish has already come true

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184360
    12 11 1 S
    post #183769
    225 354 3 E

    deadcookie

    Member

    the wrinkles of cloth the moist fat red cock, and the strings of precum as lubricant... oh my god this is peak.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #183785
    22 11 2 S
    post #184362
    57 72 2 Q
    post #184362
    57 72 2 Q

    n n

    Member

    Enjoy youth while it lasts flora, You will get there soon enough :P

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #184357
    45 71 1 Q
    post #184358
    33 29 3 S

    n n

    Member

    Awww that has to be the gen that has given me the biggest smile of the day. so wonderfully cute 🥰

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    foxlover78982

    Member

    lor7n said:
    I admit this was my mistake. I didn’t look carefully enough, and I only noticed it after the post had already been deleted. I apologize for that. However, the finger count mismatch is indeed an obvious issue. Though perhaps I shouldn’t be discussing deletion decisions here. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    It's no big deal; I'm not offended.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #100728
    107 297 2 E
    post #184183
    131 191 4 E
    post #184325
    53 68 2 Q
    post #184088
    109 159 1 E
    post #184068
    167 236 3 E

    Corsetlover

    Member

    Amazing. Love the outfit, the pose, and the character design. Hope to see more of them in the future!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    LoR7n

    Janitor

    foxlover78982 said:
    I totally get where you're coming from. Recently, one of my images was removed, and one of the reasons given was that the character was missing a left ear. But the ear was actually there—it just blended in a bit with the color of the hair.
    But I'm too lazy to even argue about these things anymore.

    I admit this was my mistake. I didn’t look carefully enough, and I only noticed it after the post had already been deleted. I apologize for that. However, the finger count mismatch is indeed an obvious issue. Though perhaps I shouldn’t be discussing deletion decisions here. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184358
    33 29 3 S
    post #184183
    131 191 4 E
    post #184290
    38 46 4 E
    post #184356
    71 81 1 E
    post #181956
    108 160 3 E
    post #184322
    84 100 4 E
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    foxlover78982

    Member

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    I totally get where you're coming from. Recently, one of my images was removed, and one of the reasons given was that the character was missing a left ear. But the ear was actually there—it just blended in a bit with the color of the hair.
    But I'm too lazy to even argue about these things anymore.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184358
    33 29 3 S
    post #182556
    63 84 1 Q
    post #184331
    41 53 2 Q
    post #184318
    132 197 3 E

    WhereWolf

    Member

    Why spend the energy chasing your prey when all you need to do is lay there looking gorgeous and delicious?

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184269
    42 62 7 E

    DuckSiri

    Member

    n_n said:
    All appreciated :P

    As are all the comments, compliments and inspirations from you and everyone who’s been keeping up with the comic so far! Cannot thank you enough! ❤️

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184290
    38 46 4 E
    post #184312
    95 133 1 E
    post #184289
    51 65 3 E
    post #184269
    42 62 7 E

    n n

    Member

    ducksiri said:
    I may be drawing it out, but I wanna make up for all the story and lore I put in the beginning!

    All appreciated :P

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #184354
    60 92 1 E
    post #184195
    114 170 1 E
    post #184347
    94 109 6 E
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    DRLa

    Developer

    lizzyroo said:
    I think we need something like e6ai2 where quality guidelines are bit more well relaxed, well thats just me.
    IE if eye is slightly messed up, thats fine, if bit blurry, thats fine.
    Where images aren't 100% perfect like it needs to be on e6ai.
    This is where e6ai2 comes in, where images aren't 100% perfect, but people want to post them. perhaps others can comment on it and give tips and helpful suggestion

    *this is also my bad apparently I did a Report and did Not read I was doing a Report. I am Truly Sorry.

    You should checkout the Discord then. We have a gen sharing channel where we don't enforce quality guidelines. We also have channels for getting feedback on WIPs and asking for help. Some users post more often-or even exclusively-on Discord.

  • |
  • 8
    •
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    tobbe

    Member

    I appreciate the high quality standards, even if they are frustrating at times. I've had my fair share of submissions deleted, some several times for new errors one after another.
    See this image above and other cartoony images can be sloppy, aside from apparent anatomical anomalies. It's part of being cartoony. But in more realistic images, as I and many others try to make, a little slop is much more apparent and ruins the image. I don't know, it's a difficult line to draw. Maybe drop the demands by about 10%, then again maybe it's good with demands of perfection the way it is, even if it is frustrating.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    Technical-Grid

    Janitor

    lizzyroo said:
    ok lets get the Magnifying glass out and see if it is a Pass.

    Better not or you'll the the jpg artifacts 💀
    (Which is easily fixable by 1:1 upscaling it and then saving it as a png)

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #184335
    62 69 1 E
    post #184326
    43 56 1 E
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    Tamara

    Member

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    Inpainting is your friend. All these little sloppy bits can be easily corrected with a bit of inpainting. And, in my experience, the janitors are quite forgiving with backgrounds, because the ai is still not there yet. Unless it's a glaring problem like the horizon line not matching up on both sides of a character, which happened to me, and I fixed in about 10 minutes with some quick inpainting and the picture was validated.

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #184300
    23 29 2 Q
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    Lizzyroo

    Member

    drla said:
    Posts approved before the current quality guidelined are allowed to stay. Otherwise we'd have to pretty much delete everything from the first two years of the site...

    I think we need something like e6ai2 where quality guidelines are bit more well relaxed, well thats just me.
    IE if eye is slightly messed up, thats fine, if bit blurry, thats fine.
    Where images aren't 100% perfect like it needs to be on e6ai.
    This is where e6ai2 comes in, where images aren't 100% perfect, but people want to post them. perhaps others can comment on it and give tips and helpful suggestion

    *this is also my bad apparently I did a Report and did Not read I was doing a Report. I am Truly Sorry.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184205
    77 107 5 Q
    post #184269
    42 62 7 E

    DuckSiri

    Member

    n_n said:
    Too true

    I may be drawing it out, but I wanna make up for all the story and lore I put in the beginning!

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #184202
    51 84 3 E
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    LoR7n

    Janitor

    n_n said:
    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

    Whether people are using local models or not, the quality of gens has been improving pretty significantly over time. We’d also like to see people make use of those improvements to create better and more creative work.

    A lot of those older posts were approved because they represented the level of quality that was achievable at the time. Standards change as the tools improve. If we applied today’s standards to everything that was posted two years ago, I imagine going back and deleting all of it would be quite a massive undertaking

  • |
  • 7
    •
    post #184185
    75 119 1 E
    post #184189
    46 60 3 Q
    post #183694
    75 125 4 E
    post #184176
    32 47 2 E
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    DRLa

    Developer

    n_n said:
    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

    Posts approved before the current quality guidelined are allowed to stay. Otherwise we'd have to pretty much delete everything from the first two years of the site...

  • |
  • 9
    •
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    unnatural order

    Member

    That tooth line is a bit thick on the front... could be dental abnormality. And that dot between the tail and body, possible artifact!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #184348
    47 30 23 S

    n n

    Member

    flafster said:
    Oh, I’ve tried to publish a post so many times, but the moderators rejected it every time for one reason or another; even the slightest bit of sloppiness can be grounds for removing the image—it’s disheartening. A blurry pot in the background, eyes that aren't quite right, stray scales, or anything like that can lead to removal(

    I find it odd that looking at MANY older posts on the site they are still there but have all the faults and more that new ones get blasted for.
    Maybe some "less ultra quality" gens are still using older gen tools instead? or maybe older posts all need to constantly be updated to the latest available tool quality? who can say? :P

  • |
  • 0
    •