Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #177220
    15 11 2 S
    post #177215
    78 96 3 E

    There should be another category for the quality art so people don't have to waste time sifting through all junk..

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177108
    56 81 2 Q
    post #177210
    47 46 1 Q
    post #177025
    103 95 14 E

    terraraptor said:
    Then it's off to the inpaint mines with local models for awhile as you customize and refine each segment of the image piece by piece.

    What are you using ComfyUI, krita, SwarmUI?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177190
    68 55 3 S
    post #177189
    60 74 1 Q
    post #177025
    103 95 14 E

    svir said:
    Do you have a video or explanation of how you generate such images with different characters, or is this a trade secret?

    You basically have to use a non-local, powerful remote model such as google's as a compositional starting point. The detail quality isn't great, nor is the art style, but it's pretty good for getting the characters vaguely positioned as prompted, and close-enough to desired appearance (so like, the "bones" of the image). Then it's off to the inpaint mines with local models for awhile as you customize and refine each segment of the image piece by piece. That last part takes awhile and it's why my image posts here are spaced apart by a few days, though that could also be because my computer is so slow lol.

    EDIT: Btw I shouldn't have said "have to". There's more than one way to go about it, and I've used a few different approaches throughout e6ai. For workflows that are 100% local beginning to end, there's regional prompting, or sketch inpainting, or generating singulars and plopping/stitching them into place.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #177146
    117 180 3 E
    post #176402
    58 66 3 Q
    post #176895
    64 72 8 Q
    post #177150
    15 21 2 E
    post #176816
    161 245 3 E

    deciem said:
    Once you see the pussy like a mouth and the balls as eyes, you can't see it any other way than a face.

    People are mad for good reason😐

  • |
  • 1
  • post #176807
    85 91 3 Q
    post #173785
    100 163 1 E

    The ring in his mouth looks like it isn't attached to the strap. But other than that, this image looks fantastic.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #176798
    47 56 2 E

    It only seems small because everyone else on this website has baguette sized cocks. Its actually pretty normal, and she is perfect

  • |
  • 1
  • post #176794
    101 124 1 E
    post #176780
    57 87 1 E
    post #177098
    55 84 3 E
    post #177157
    94 109 4 E
    post #177006
    150 231 2 E
    post #135621
    262 418 2 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    That is not Loona.

    we are in the early stages of local video generation, especially FURRY video generation. Don't expect prompt adherence to be perfect. I'd like to remind you that there are virtually no human beings who can create furry animations with this degree of lighting/texture realism

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177157
    94 109 4 E
    post #177177
    34 45 1 E
    post #176579
    56 72 4 E

    okt said:
    I'll just edit out the tiny human. Nice gen.

    Fortunately technology makes that a piece of cake. Happy you like it otherwise.

    furrylion said:
    I'd crawl into his sheath and stay there

    I guess that's an option ;)

    markrhey said:
    Slight size difference

    Probably just an illusion caused by the angle

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177025
    103 95 14 E

    Do you have a video or explanation of how you generate such images with different characters, or is this a trade secret?

  • |
  • 1
  • post #177176
    15 11 3 S
    post #177150
    15 21 2 E
    post #177176
    15 11 3 S
    post #176579
    56 72 4 E
    post #177175
    50 50 3 E
    post #177146
    117 180 3 E
    post #175984
    37 30 4 S
    post #177166
    92 107 1 E
    post #177162
    86 117 2 E
    post #177170
    53 40 1 S
    3 4 1 E
    post #177162
    86 117 2 E
    post #176062
    30 29 1 S
    post #175984
    37 30 4 S
    post #177138
    25 25 1 E
    post #177158
    16 23 1 E

    Thank Arceus they installed the new fun toilet in the mens room. It was getting boring using just the old porcelain ones.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #177157
    94 109 4 E
    post #177025
    103 95 14 E

    terraraptor said:
    That's mostly human. I say "mostly" cause I run my text thru spelling and grammar check, which is AI, and sometimes it'll suggest a cleaner or more coherent way to phrase something. Or if I'm struggling with coming up with a made up, invented word (For instance "obdurite" mentioned on post #159340), I may ask for plausible suggestions. A lot of my picts start out with a lore draft, and the associated pict comes later. Raegul, for instance, has been an internal footnote for awhile before being featured.

    That's still about 99% human to me, IMHO. I also write and use stuff like Grammarly, so yeah. I feel AI struggles much more with writing than with art.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #176364
    74 74 4 S
    post #177142
    161 248 2 E
    post #141079
    86 120 2 E
    post #175736
    48 71 2 E
    post #160782
    38 35 1 Q
    post #177146
    117 180 3 E

    Another surprise attack by a female migrated down from Van Cougar Island. I have a feeling this one will go unreported...

    So where is this? You know, so I can avoid it. Sure.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #171862
    161 283 2 E
    post #172503
    158 270 1 E
    post #177042
    72 101 2 E
    post #123491
    256 426 5 E
    post #172229
    107 167 1 E
    post #177121
    38 46 1 E
    post #165191
    53 85 1 E
    post #166130
    56 97 2 E
    post #164482
    68 101 1 E
    23 13 1 E
    post #177148
    8 10 1 Q
    post #177091
    70 103 2 E
    post #176988
    93 111 4 E

    chastitycoyote said:
    Chair is from the other side, HR is Human Resources - in the US a HR person is the one whos job is managing all the hires/fires/intake.

    Desk seems backwards, but its the employee side of the table where you do the computer stuff at like job intake "paperwork".

    There are several visual issues with the chair. The point you raised is the first one; Even your argument is rendered useless by the other points. Secondly, the table is against the wall, leaving no room for the chair. Thirdly, if the table were to have a back panel, the chair would end up positioned inside the table itself.

    I would suggest removing the chair from the image entirely. Alternatively, you could just remove the backrest, allowing the lower section to pass as a stool. Unfortunately, AI struggles to get spatial relationships right.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177042
    72 101 2 E
    post #74632
    56 79 4 E

    Lori enjoying what she loves most and receiving it where she loves it most! Simply perfect!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177127
    23 35 1 E

    dfY6C

    Privileged

    feels weird some stuff is uploaded but somehow unattributed to me.

    All tags are added by people to the extent of their knowledge and if they were uploading your stuff from /msdg/ rather than civit, then chances are they just simply didn't know who it was.

    Don't really have a desire to implement that.

    If you know which posts are yours, it's really easy to go in and tag those as yours. You can freely edit any of those posts, remove the anonymous- or unknown_director tag, and then add yours instead. Personally, I think it would be better to do it and have that out of the way for the convenience of users who want to find your stuff here. Obviously, that's still up to you in the end though.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177058
    94 125 3 E
    post #176987
    43 34 2 S
    post #177092
    99 139 1 E
    post #176935
    67 52 9 S

    My sense is this. What we call anthropomorphic foxes or horses or dogs or cats or other such bipedal beings that populate this site aren't anthropomorphic animals, but are zoomorphic humans. In other words, humans that have been altered to have traits similar to some cute (or sexy) animals. If you look at them you can tell the base being is human, so I don't think the subject couple is in violation of Leviticus ch 18.

    On another note, aside from mostly being about not having sex with relatives, Leviticus ch 18 also forbids you from having sex with a girl who's mensurating... Come on! We've all gotten drunk with our significant other at the wrong time of the month and the only harm was to our sheets! *sigh* Take it as you will.

    Love the romantic pieces like this on this site.

  • |
  • 2
  • 29 42 4 E
    post #152658
    113 174 5 E

    lolingtons77 said:
    I'm sorry, i didnt see this until way later looking back on old posts. If you do manage to see this, i made the Lora myslef.

    Ah, okay. I thought I could find it online. It came out really well 😉

  • |
  • 0
  • post #176974
    36 39 4 E

    srmalloy said:
    It's Natasha that has the 'cutouts' in the white markings on her face, not Lori; see https://e621.net/posts/1288361 with, left to right, Lori, Onyx, and Natasha.

    I know exactly what the three sisters look like—I've been familiar with Hardiman's art since 2007—but it's hard to get the AI to follow instructions and replicate a fur pattern 100%. I think I managed to get pretty close, though!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #174926
    102 158 3 E
    post #167377
    111 172 4 E

    nxghtfxrry said:
    You must log in with an account or email address
    to view explicit content,
    and also adjust your browsing level.

    does civetai still work without a billion limitations? I had a login and it went through some BS that would not lemme do a LOT of things u see on here.. and you had credits you get and run out of quickly..

    broken AF sometimes RN but I been using perchance.org and just google NSFW perchance.org or unlimited perchance.org because they have like 1000's of pages of different style generators some good other really bad but u eventually find a decent few & swap between them when the AI wants to be stuck on stupid...

  • |
  • 0