Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #170008
    239 368 10 E

    furryranch said:
    But how does she have a picture, of the picture we're looking at??

    And a picture of the picture within it!

  • |
  • 2
  • post #170080
    344 542 7 E
    post #170091
    60 66 6 E

    Hitoner has sky-rocketed to become one of my favourite on-going series

  • |
  • 2
  • 8 12 2 E

    No, it's not quite Mila but she is cute and quite good in her own right!

  • |
  • 0
  • 125 206 2 E

    Oh come on! That watermark is just TOO intrusive right there. (I only complain because I love it.)

  • |
  • 6
  • post #169997
    93 128 1 E
    post #150464
    84 161 6 E

    Ah yes, the completely debunked myth that people refuse to let die. Yeah, there are similarities. No, it was not a copy, a ripoff, or anything like what this poster claims.

    In 1994, Takayuki Matsutani, the president of Osamu Tezuka’s production company Tezuka Productions, said:

    Quite a few staff of our company saw a preview of “The Lion King,” discussed this subject and came to the conclusion that you cannot avoid having these similarities as long as you use animals as characters and try to draw images out of them.

    Quote is from Huffpost but I've seen it other places too, that was just the easiest to find with a search.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #148480
    82 100 3 S
    post #170043
    6 4 1 Q
    post #170093
    111 139 1 S

    n n

    Member

    Oh yes! more of the super adorable husky ❤️❤️❤️ :D Thank you!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #163492
    68 42 6 S

    dodgey_roger said:
    What about the male fox not having a tail at all? Lol

    I didn’t even notice that fox tail on the horse until people pointed it out in the comments. And as for the male fox… let’s just imagine that his tail hangs to the right, i.e. behind his body :)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #123484
    325 540 1 E
    post #170039
    91 150 1 E

    Wow, super picture—awesome! Is it possible to get this in the "mega" form too? Only if you can, of course. ^^

  • |
  • 3
  • 8 12 2 E

    I think she is hinting at something. I need to continue observing some more of this behavior

  • |
  • 0
  • post #145288
    26 16 4 S
    post #167801
    43 48 4 S
    post #169987
    105 107 3 S
    post #169989
    80 114 10 Q
    post #170025
    73 107 2 E
    post #169290
    109 175 1 E
    post #118486
    152 296 1 E
    post #170044
    22 23 1 S
    post #151633
    49 34 9 S
    40 42 1 E
    7 12 1 E
    post #170053
    146 250 4 E
    13 13 2 Q
    post #170057
    25 50 1 E
    post #170065
    293 480 2 E
    post #170080
    344 542 7 E
    post #170086
    90 137 1 E
    post #167819
    163 319 1 E
    post #170013
    21 17 2 S
    post #170080
    344 542 7 E
    post #170069
    5 16 2 S
    post #170063
    150 228 3 E
    post #170063
    150 228 3 E
    post #164364
    0 6 1 E
    28 28 1 E
    post #170055
    34 26 2 S
    post #167340
    299 505 1 E
    post #163492
    68 42 6 S
    post #170033
    64 83 1 S

    n n

    Member

    ❤️🐺 Hunks like these don't even have to ask

  • |
  • 2
  • post #163623
    78 145 4 E

    Only OG’s remember when dithering like this was necessary for systems limited to 16-bit color, limited space to store images, or limited bandwidth to load them (think 56kbps or less). This would look so silky smooth on a CRT.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #170030
    158 257 1 E
    post #170023
    145 224 1 E
    post #170020
    43 68 2 E
    post #167720
    267 444 7 E

    lionxld said:
    So you used Photoshop to stitch them together in post-production?

    You can do that or blob them in with any art program (ms paint is enough) and a couple of moderate-denoise inpaints to preserve a pose/composition. I mostly do the latter, but either way the last step is a soft inpainting pass to minimize stitches/halos. If you need anything else feel free to pm me.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #152947
    34 19 3 S
    post #165330
    35 49 2 E
    post #155685
    450 763 8 E
    post #166256
    17 23 4 S
    post #170017
    230 401 6 E
    post #157687
    274 459 9 Q
    post #170062
    145 242 3 E

    is this the musky gamer-girl wolf waifu the future has promised us?

  • |
  • 3
  • post #166204
    33 12 2 S

    Your stuff is so good, it's so lovely the breath of fresh air you bring. :)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #170080
    344 542 7 E
    post #169921
    39 30 13 S
    post #168645
    33 49 1 E

    Honestly the redesign makes way more sense for the character description than the original design. Pretty girls who have time to groom and care for their appearance don’t work as solo mercenaries sleeping in the cockpit of their ships for whom more than basic hygiene is a luxury.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #170080
    344 542 7 E
    post #170054
    24 26 1 S
    post #169724
    203 328 1 E
    post #169743
    60 48 3 S
    post #169744
    43 46 6 Q
    post #169774
    24 32 3 S
    post #169820
    262 420 6 E
    post #169921
    39 30 13 S

    Wow.. now that is utterly impressive! I also used Gemini, but I only got the medium level teir, mostly for storage and all that. I'll have to play around, get some more info!

  • |
  • 1
  • 73 100 2 E
    post #170063
    150 228 3 E
    post #170062
    145 242 3 E
    post #170042
    80 119 2 Q

    squishface said:
    Well done Vader-sa er uh I mean Vartasaur

    I kinda get the hate for AI when it's obvious which artist's work got scraped for the models.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #170037
    102 161 1 E
    post #170053
    146 250 4 E

    Yay! Another anteater pic! They are always so pretty and hot! Love that amazing tongue!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #170061
    21 31 1 E
    post #169125
    56 91 1 Q