Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #153576
    180 275 5 E
    post #153567
    62 72 3 Q
    post #148739
    179 310 5 E
    post #153807
    92 144 3 S
    post #133805
    154 216 4 E
    post #153689
    103 170 2 E
    post #152814
    423 723 4 E
    post #153820
    172 220 10 Q

    googous

    Member

    much appreciate the higher fps version and all the great moves. looks so clean. the twerking is crazy.. and some of her other moves are so sexy.
    love this song, makes me want to make better music.
    thanks for making this!

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #153819
    261 423 1 E
    post #153667
    17 32 15 E

    Master Debater

    Member

    penisfire said:
    Another one of mine was deleted today, it followed all the rules. But because the penis got just somewhat slightly more girthy at the end that they said it turned into a fist... it did not. The bureaucracy levels here are impossible for anyone to upload anything without it being under a magnifying glass to a level that almost seems comical.

    I'm glad to hear things get approved quicker now, but it was reasons like this that I left.

    I think you just called out the mods for being unapologetically autistic without meaning to.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #152313
    100 135 1 S
    post #153425
    58 49 3 S
    post #153431
    54 54 3 S
    post #153712
    45 46 2 S
    post #153713
    58 70 2 S

    Dimot

    Member

    It's all fun and games until I take an ax to the knees.
    ;P

    Very pretty.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #153822
    185 342 3 E
    post #153825
    18 10 2 E
    post #153843
    37 50 2 S

    ChastityCoyote

    Member

    From scratch, without the damn UI resizing things every time I made an inpaint. Maybe one day I'll figure this whole thing out.

    The struggle is real, i know your pain.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    28 56 1 E
    post #153700
    114 155 7 Q

    WhereWolf

    Member

    wc_latrans said:
    That workshop has some odd tools in it; so I assume you asked the AI for an image of Gadget in a workshop, and because she's female it surrounded her with kitchen utensils. This would be an example of the ingrained bias that has unfortunately been carried over from reality, and into the AI models.

    Also is it wrong I clicked on this post just to see what nonsense the AI put into the background of the image?

    Well, maybe this is the kitchen part of her workshop? A girl's gotta eat, and I'm sure she's inventive enough to cook for herself. ;)

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #153828
    91 149 3 E

    WC Latrans

    Member

    Must have laid down too close to where they were decorating the easter eggs.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #153835
    6 14 2 S
    post #153835
    6 14 2 S
    post #153820
    172 220 10 Q
    post #153700
    114 155 7 Q

    WC Latrans

    Member

    eheyebs said:
    I did try inpainting to see if it would fix it, but nothing good came up. So at this point its just "Shes a mouse making weird tools with whatever scraps she can get!"

    She is supposed to be quite inventive. If anyone could make due with improper/inadequate tooling it would be her. Also what little I have messed with AI image generation it can be quite hard to get it to produce what you want sometimes, the primary focus came out nice though.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #153830
    229 333 3 E

    squishface

    Member

    What an exquisite design for a dragon. I especially love her floppy ears.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    50 79 8 E
    50 79 8 E

    WC Latrans

    Member

    @2:23
    A sauna, in a locker, with the wall boards being suspended by shower curtain rods...
    HOW DO YOU KNOW ABOUT MY STRANGE FETISH!!!

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #153673
    213 325 1 E

    squishface

    Member

    Thanks for this, OP. No one's managed to do her justice yet even though the game's been out for awhile. May as well be AI.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    50 79 8 E

    gridanon

    Member

    Wow! Really impressed to see something this long and complex. Excellent work Unsauceballs! It'd be great to hear about how you made this.

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #153820
    172 220 10 Q
    13 15 1 Q
    post #153780
    42 63 5 Q
    post #153769
    262 396 2 E
    post #153780
    42 63 5 Q
    post #153822
    185 342 3 E
    post #153071
    15 39 2 S
    post #153239
    28 42 4 E
    post #153239
    28 42 4 E
    post #153768
    347 598 4 E
    post #153239
    28 42 4 E

    gobabsnow

    Member

    gridanon said:
    She cute! It's neat to see how many different characters you can make look good gobabsnow. Have you considered doing more complex scenes than pinups? It'd be neat to see a scene with multiple characters from you!

    It's possible with novelai and the Hoshino model from pixai.art (depending on the species). But for the characters I use Lora for, it's not possible ^^' I don't know how to do it

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #153617
    151 258 3 E

    lichking127

    Member

    chimbochim said:
    Where do you see a male on this gen ? Please be mindful of your tags. It's not solo either.

    solo was wrong yes, but I'm pretty sure these hands classify as male hands.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #153810
    24 44 1 Q

    gridanon

    Member

    Oh neat! Nice job with this Mairox. It's rare to see macro/micro stuff, and the dialog here is a great addition too!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #153807
    92 144 3 S
    post #153585
    95 162 1 E

    Delken

    Member

    goddamn, I thought I was in a regular anhes post for a sec

  • |
  • 6
    •
    post #153807
    92 144 3 S
    post #153412
    57 98 2 E

    RotStinken

    Member

    deltaflame said:
    Home early from... where, exactly? Richard isn't conceptually allowed to have a job

    i like to imagine he's out doing something completely retarded somewhere, like some kind of repetitive antics with the boys and Anais. i totally didn't forget about that and gen this in a fugue state for the blue cat!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #153667
    17 32 15 E

    penisfire

    Member

    kaleth said:
    The only advice I can give you is to make yourself a checklist from the uploading guidelines and make sure that your gens respect them.

    Another one of mine was deleted today, it followed all the rules. But because the penis got just somewhat slightly more girthy at the end that they said it turned into a fist... it did not. The bureaucracy levels here are impossible for anyone to upload anything without it being under a magnifying glass to a level that almost seems comical.

    I'm glad to hear things get approved quicker now, but it was reasons like this that I left.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #153699
    93 164 2 E
    post #153750
    80 109 1 E

    DeNatural

    Former Staff

    After Wani's last visit to moon, she is now in crippling debt and can't even afford pants.

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #153784
    41 43 4 S

    Noverthink

    Member

    drla said:
    95 for a coffee, man I thought those used to be cheaper...

    It's just me being too lazy to correct it back to $ after letting the model to blend the sign in, but whatever, it's canon now. Furry Canada got hit with really nasty coffee bean and green tea shortages in the mid 90s, tough times.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    20 28 4 E

    Elyren

    Member

    bagelmonster said:
    Unfortunately a lot of the official art of Absol has this sort of more flat, hybrid canine/human face. Adding in the kissing probably made the model lean a bit more towards the human side, just based off the training data. I can definitely see how it might be too uncanny for some.

    For what it's worth, I don't think it is a canine anyway, the mythical creatures it is based on lean more bovid to felid, I honestly think the face is a bit more felid, too, and it has a mane that kind of gives the vibe of something like a mountain dwelling lion(a more literal mountain lion I suppose). Compared to a lot of pokemon we don't have as direct of a real animal basis, it isn't obvious the way something like say Ninetales or Liepard are, but with what we've been given as far as the general appearance and mythology of it, I can't see it as being canine, maybe before we got the sphinx mega, but ever since then it's felt off to interpret it that way.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #153793
    376 650 7 E
    post #153784
    41 43 4 S

    Tazzer

    Member

    drla said:
    95 for a coffee, man I thought those used to be cheaper...

    I believe that 9 is supposed to be a $

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #153667
    17 32 15 E

    Kaleth

    Janitor

    penisfire said:
    It's usually no slack from what I've seen on my end.

    I hear you, it's clear from the few interactions I've seen that there's frustration. You're welcome to reach out to dispute deletions, this is especially true for deletions that you felt came too quickly. Not only you can reach out to the janitor who deleted your post, you can reach out to other janitors, mods, and admins if you think you are treated unfairly.

    penisfire said:
    Posts need to be approved before people can upload again and I remember it taking months, but deletions are literally 1-2 days.

    While it was true, the team have grown since then, nowadays posts almost never sit more than 3 days in the pending queue. Deletions and approvals usually happen within the day. The posts that stays longer are posts having problems that a janitor judged minor enough to let it slide, however that means an other janitor needs to go over it. Janitors are all volunteers, so we work when we have time, at our own pace.

    penisfire said:
    Except for my previous version I made of her giving a bj a year ago... heck I'll say you should delete the old one because that was given way too much slack, or at least compared to now where the technology has just gotten better. But that was the exception at the time maybe.

    The technology is evolving so fast, if we did not choose to grandfather older posts we would be constantly erasing posts. You shouldn't worry about those older animations.

    penisfire said:
    I try to do unique animations, which means there is hours of trial and error on my end. Most animations I come across feel "samey" in style and characters, so I'm trying to bring something different to the table which means the AI isn't always as familiar. I don't just churn in anything and call it a day, I generate it well over a dozen times until I can get the best results with an online software I wait for on credits.

    Unfortunately, there's no objective way to know, just by looking, the amount of time a director spent on an artwork/video. We don't judge the style or the visual complexity either since it's also too subjective. We have to judge them all on objective things like resolution, compression, anatomy, concision, etc. Janitors have to delete excellent artworks all the time because rules are rules.

    The only advice I can give you is to make yourself a checklist from the uploading guidelines and make sure that your gens respect them.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #153784
    41 43 4 S

    DRLa

    Developer

    95 for a coffee, man I thought those used to be cheaper...

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #153378
    15 21 2 S
    post #153561
    21 28 2 E
    20 28 4 E

    BagelMonster

    Member

    damnedfurry said:
    That is a very uncanny-valley-tier human-like face on the Absol

    Unfortunately a lot of the official art of Absol has this sort of more flat, hybrid canine/human face. Adding in the kissing probably made the model lean a bit more towards the human side, just based off the training data. I can definitely see how it might be too uncanny for some.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #153657
    230 233 16 S

    WhigWhamMaster

    Member

    i'm sorry but no i can't open it, because if i do you'll leave and i'll be deprived of the cutest thing to walk the earth

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #153787
    21 27 1 S
    post #153771
    57 82 2 E
    post #153588
    8 12 14 S

    Harroden

    Member

    How the... Did you change your nickname? Or director name, I suppose. I was certain I blacklisted your tag. Some kind of lag, I suppose, if you didn't change it.
    Well, since I'm here... Reminder for others to also blacklist what you don't like to see.

  • |
  • -4
    •
    post #153793
    376 650 7 E

    XXXMISTERCOOLXXX

    Member

    hogan said:
    It's nothing personal .... and how do I decide - oatmeal raisin, or chocolate chip?

    How about both: Oatmeal raisin chocolate chip cookies

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #153382
    399 643 11 E

    Jamicom

    Member

    un_known said:
    Одна из лучших анимаций, что я когда либо видел на этом сайте. Эта кошка - просто прекрасна. Конечно, искуственному интеллекту ещё предстоит научиться анимировать, но совершенство уже не за горами. И что-то мне подсказывает, что в гонке совершенства ваше место - одно из первых.

    Как не привычно видеть русских на этом сайте

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #153768
    347 598 4 E

    XXXMISTERCOOLXXX

    Member

    rhorimu said:
    Very nice. Glad to finally see she's made her way over here form e621. Can't wait to see more

    She is really beautiful, but unfortunately I don't know this character; does she come from a film or game?

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #153785
    21 27 3 S

    satanapossum

    Member

    gridanon said:
    Super cute! I really like this traditional media looking style you're using, it's a nice look that stands out from all the digital art styled gens.

    ty, but i just noticed an error so this one might need a reupload lol

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #153793
    376 650 7 E

    Hogan

    Member

    It's nothing personal .... and how do I decide - oatmeal raisin, or chocolate chip?

  • |
  • 9
    •
    post #153785
    21 27 3 S

    gridanon

    Member

    Super cute! I really like this traditional media looking style you're using, it's a nice look that stands out from all the digital art styled gens.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #153700
    114 155 7 Q

    EHEYEBS

    Member

    wc_latrans said:
    That workshop has some odd tools in it; so I assume you asked the AI for an image of Gadget in a workshop, and because she's female it surrounded her with kitchen utensils. This would be an example of the ingrained bias that has unfortunately been carried over from reality, and into the AI models.

    Also is it wrong I clicked on this post just to see what nonsense the AI put into the background of the image?

    I did try inpainting to see if it would fix it, but nothing good came up. So at this point its just "Shes a mouse making weird tools with whatever scraps she can get!"

  • |
  • 1
    •
    20 28 4 E

    Elyren

    Member

    damnedfurry said:
    That is a very uncanny-valley-tier human-like face on the Absol

    Absol has a bit more human-like of a face than some other pokemon, I think. It is based on a bai ze or haku taku, which do have human faces, and the mega is a sphinx, same deal there. I figure a realistic Absol probably would look a little uncanny.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #153493
    82 131 1 E
    post #153667
    17 32 15 E

    penisfire

    Member

    kaleth said:
    This is ironic, because if it takes time to approve an individual post it's because janitors discusses in the background how much slack they want to give to posts that would otherwise be deleted. It doesn't take more time to approve than to delete posts that are clear cut decisions. It's just easier to see deletions than it is to see approvals, because deletions are more impactful.

    In short, in order to go as quick as you suggested, we'd have to get rid of a process that save posts from deletion.

    It's usually no slack from what I've seen on my end. Posts need to be approved before people can upload again and I remember it taking months, but deletions are literally 1-2 days. Except for my previous version I made of her giving a bj a year ago... heck I'll say you should delete the old one because that was given way too much slack, or at least compared to now where the technology has just gotten better. But that was the exception at the time maybe.

    I try to do unique animations, which means there is hours of trial and error on my end. Most animations I come across feel "samey" in style and characters, so I'm trying to bring something different to the table which means the AI isn't always as familiar. I don't just churn in anything and call it a day, I generate it well over a dozen times until I can get the best results with an online software I wait for on credits.

  • |
  • -1
    •
    post #153667
    17 32 15 E

    penisfire

    Member

    redpanda said:
    Good answer. BUT.

    Look at your video. Even now, the result is mediocre at best. The idea is interesting, and dinosaurs are rare, too. Problem 1 is that the semen appears out of nowhere, and problem 2 is that Charlene moves like a robot, which leads to problem 3, the blowjob looks like she's chewing on a bone.

    It's better to spend a little more time on a video and produce good quality.

    You say out of nowhere....who's to say the guy hasn't already came and at this point it's just dripping from her mouth? Her movement is fine... she's halfway to looking like an animatronic so as the director I approved that aesthetic... that's not an error. The way she's doing it is pretty close to how a big suit would with organic looking parts. At this point it just becomes a matter of opinion and not having an "error". You say more time, I spent hours generating with credits then took it into premiere pro to cut around. AI is fickle, especially if you don't have some local ComfyUI with a lot of ram. Most people don't have the animation models for mimicking a sample video for some perfection level animation.

  • |
  • -3
    •
    post #153744
    228 348 2 E