Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #153071
    15 39 2 S
    post #153239
    28 42 4 E
    post #153239
    28 42 4 E
    post #153768
    345 594 4 E
    post #153239
    28 42 4 E

    gridanon said:
    She cute! It's neat to see how many different characters you can make look good gobabsnow. Have you considered doing more complex scenes than pinups? It'd be neat to see a scene with multiple characters from you!

    It's possible with novelai and the Hoshino model from pixai.art (depending on the species). But for the characters I use Lora for, it's not possible ^^' I don't know how to do it

  • |
  • 1
  • post #153617
    150 257 3 E

    chimbochim said:
    Where do you see a male on this gen ? Please be mindful of your tags. It's not solo either.

    solo was wrong yes, but I'm pretty sure these hands classify as male hands.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #153810
    24 44 1 Q

    Oh neat! Nice job with this Mairox. It's rare to see macro/micro stuff, and the dialog here is a great addition too!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #153807
    91 143 3 S
    post #153585
    95 162 1 E

    goddamn, I thought I was in a regular anhes post for a sec

  • |
  • 6
  • post #153807
    91 143 3 S
    post #153412
    56 96 2 E

    deltaflame said:
    Home early from... where, exactly? Richard isn't conceptually allowed to have a job

    i like to imagine he's out doing something completely retarded somewhere, like some kind of repetitive antics with the boys and Anais. i totally didn't forget about that and gen this in a fugue state for the blue cat!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #153667
    17 32 15 E

    kaleth said:
    The only advice I can give you is to make yourself a checklist from the uploading guidelines and make sure that your gens respect them.

    Another one of mine was deleted today, it followed all the rules. But because the penis got just somewhat slightly more girthy at the end that they said it turned into a fist... it did not. The bureaucracy levels here are impossible for anyone to upload anything without it being under a magnifying glass to a level that almost seems comical.

    I'm glad to hear things get approved quicker now, but it was reasons like this that I left.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #153699
    93 164 2 E
    post #153750
    80 109 1 E

    DeNatural

    Former Staff

    After Wani's last visit to moon, she is now in crippling debt and can't even afford pants.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #153784
    41 43 4 S

    drla said:
    95 for a coffee, man I thought those used to be cheaper...

    It's just me being too lazy to correct it back to $ after letting the model to blend the sign in, but whatever, it's canon now. Furry Canada got hit with really nasty coffee bean and green tea shortages in the mid 90s, tough times.

  • |
  • 1
  • 20 28 4 E

    bagelmonster said:
    Unfortunately a lot of the official art of Absol has this sort of more flat, hybrid canine/human face. Adding in the kissing probably made the model lean a bit more towards the human side, just based off the training data. I can definitely see how it might be too uncanny for some.

    For what it's worth, I don't think it is a canine anyway, the mythical creatures it is based on lean more bovid to felid, I honestly think the face is a bit more felid, too, and it has a mane that kind of gives the vibe of something like a mountain dwelling lion(a more literal mountain lion I suppose). Compared to a lot of pokemon we don't have as direct of a real animal basis, it isn't obvious the way something like say Ninetales or Liepard are, but with what we've been given as far as the general appearance and mythology of it, I can't see it as being canine, maybe before we got the sphinx mega, but ever since then it's felt off to interpret it that way.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #153793
    375 649 7 E
    post #153784
    41 43 4 S

    drla said:
    95 for a coffee, man I thought those used to be cheaper...

    I believe that 9 is supposed to be a $

  • |
  • 0
  • post #153667
    17 32 15 E

    penisfire said:
    It's usually no slack from what I've seen on my end.

    I hear you, it's clear from the few interactions I've seen that there's frustration. You're welcome to reach out to dispute deletions, this is especially true for deletions that you felt came too quickly. Not only you can reach out to the janitor who deleted your post, you can reach out to other janitors, mods, and admins if you think you are treated unfairly.

    penisfire said:
    Posts need to be approved before people can upload again and I remember it taking months, but deletions are literally 1-2 days.

    While it was true, the team have grown since then, nowadays posts almost never sit more than 3 days in the pending queue. Deletions and approvals usually happen within the day. The posts that stays longer are posts having problems that a janitor judged minor enough to let it slide, however that means an other janitor needs to go over it. Janitors are all volunteers, so we work when we have time, at our own pace.

    penisfire said:
    Except for my previous version I made of her giving a bj a year ago... heck I'll say you should delete the old one because that was given way too much slack, or at least compared to now where the technology has just gotten better. But that was the exception at the time maybe.

    The technology is evolving so fast, if we did not choose to grandfather older posts we would be constantly erasing posts. You shouldn't worry about those older animations.

    penisfire said:
    I try to do unique animations, which means there is hours of trial and error on my end. Most animations I come across feel "samey" in style and characters, so I'm trying to bring something different to the table which means the AI isn't always as familiar. I don't just churn in anything and call it a day, I generate it well over a dozen times until I can get the best results with an online software I wait for on credits.

    Unfortunately, there's no objective way to know, just by looking, the amount of time a director spent on an artwork/video. We don't judge the style or the visual complexity either since it's also too subjective. We have to judge them all on objective things like resolution, compression, anatomy, concision, etc. Janitors have to delete excellent artworks all the time because rules are rules.

    The only advice I can give you is to make yourself a checklist from the uploading guidelines and make sure that your gens respect them.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #153784
    41 43 4 S

    DRLa

    Developer

    95 for a coffee, man I thought those used to be cheaper...

  • |
  • 5
  • post #153378
    15 21 2 S
    post #153561
    21 28 2 E
    20 28 4 E

    damnedfurry said:
    That is a very uncanny-valley-tier human-like face on the Absol

    Unfortunately a lot of the official art of Absol has this sort of more flat, hybrid canine/human face. Adding in the kissing probably made the model lean a bit more towards the human side, just based off the training data. I can definitely see how it might be too uncanny for some.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #153657
    230 233 16 S

    i'm sorry but no i can't open it, because if i do you'll leave and i'll be deprived of the cutest thing to walk the earth

  • |
  • 5
  • post #153787
    20 27 1 S
    post #153771
    57 82 2 E
    post #153588
    8 12 14 S

    How the... Did you change your nickname? Or director name, I suppose. I was certain I blacklisted your tag. Some kind of lag, I suppose, if you didn't change it.
    Well, since I'm here... Reminder for others to also blacklist what you don't like to see.

  • |
  • -3
  • post #153793
    375 649 7 E

    hogan said:
    It's nothing personal .... and how do I decide - oatmeal raisin, or chocolate chip?

    How about both: Oatmeal raisin chocolate chip cookies

  • |
  • 5
  • post #153382
    399 643 11 E

    un_known said:
    Одна из лучших анимаций, что я когда либо видел на этом сайте. Эта кошка - просто прекрасна. Конечно, искуственному интеллекту ещё предстоит научиться анимировать, но совершенство уже не за горами. И что-то мне подсказывает, что в гонке совершенства ваше место - одно из первых.

    Как не привычно видеть русских на этом сайте

  • |
  • 1
  • post #153768
    345 594 4 E

    rhorimu said:
    Very nice. Glad to finally see she's made her way over here form e621. Can't wait to see more

    She is really beautiful, but unfortunately I don't know this character; does she come from a film or game?

  • |
  • 1
  • post #153785
    21 27 3 S

    gridanon said:
    Super cute! I really like this traditional media looking style you're using, it's a nice look that stands out from all the digital art styled gens.

    ty, but i just noticed an error so this one might need a reupload lol

  • |
  • 2
  • post #153793
    375 649 7 E

    It's nothing personal .... and how do I decide - oatmeal raisin, or chocolate chip?

  • |
  • 9
  • post #153785
    21 27 3 S

    Super cute! I really like this traditional media looking style you're using, it's a nice look that stands out from all the digital art styled gens.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #153700
    114 155 7 Q

    wc_latrans said:
    That workshop has some odd tools in it; so I assume you asked the AI for an image of Gadget in a workshop, and because she's female it surrounded her with kitchen utensils. This would be an example of the ingrained bias that has unfortunately been carried over from reality, and into the AI models.

    Also is it wrong I clicked on this post just to see what nonsense the AI put into the background of the image?

    I did try inpainting to see if it would fix it, but nothing good came up. So at this point its just "Shes a mouse making weird tools with whatever scraps she can get!"

  • |
  • 1
  • 20 28 4 E

    damnedfurry said:
    That is a very uncanny-valley-tier human-like face on the Absol

    Absol has a bit more human-like of a face than some other pokemon, I think. It is based on a bai ze or haku taku, which do have human faces, and the mega is a sphinx, same deal there. I figure a realistic Absol probably would look a little uncanny.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #153493
    82 130 1 E
    post #153667
    17 32 15 E

    kaleth said:
    This is ironic, because if it takes time to approve an individual post it's because janitors discusses in the background how much slack they want to give to posts that would otherwise be deleted. It doesn't take more time to approve than to delete posts that are clear cut decisions. It's just easier to see deletions than it is to see approvals, because deletions are more impactful.

    In short, in order to go as quick as you suggested, we'd have to get rid of a process that save posts from deletion.

    It's usually no slack from what I've seen on my end. Posts need to be approved before people can upload again and I remember it taking months, but deletions are literally 1-2 days. Except for my previous version I made of her giving a bj a year ago... heck I'll say you should delete the old one because that was given way too much slack, or at least compared to now where the technology has just gotten better. But that was the exception at the time maybe.

    I try to do unique animations, which means there is hours of trial and error on my end. Most animations I come across feel "samey" in style and characters, so I'm trying to bring something different to the table which means the AI isn't always as familiar. I don't just churn in anything and call it a day, I generate it well over a dozen times until I can get the best results with an online software I wait for on credits.

  • |
  • -1
  • post #153667
    17 32 15 E

    redpanda said:
    Good answer. BUT.

    Look at your video. Even now, the result is mediocre at best. The idea is interesting, and dinosaurs are rare, too. Problem 1 is that the semen appears out of nowhere, and problem 2 is that Charlene moves like a robot, which leads to problem 3, the blowjob looks like she's chewing on a bone.

    It's better to spend a little more time on a video and produce good quality.

    You say out of nowhere....who's to say the guy hasn't already came and at this point it's just dripping from her mouth? Her movement is fine... she's halfway to looking like an animatronic so as the director I approved that aesthetic... that's not an error. The way she's doing it is pretty close to how a big suit would with organic looking parts. At this point it just becomes a matter of opinion and not having an "error". You say more time, I spent hours generating with credits then took it into premiere pro to cut around. AI is fickle, especially if you don't have some local ComfyUI with a lot of ram. Most people don't have the animation models for mimicking a sample video for some perfection level animation.

  • |
  • -3
  • post #153744
    227 347 2 E
    post #153705
    321 436 7 E
    post #149961
    47 54 4 S

    leyendaai said:
    Я с вк стикерами на постоянке делал арты, только не всё сюда заливал

    Сорян за долгий ответ. Я просто приятно удивился когда увидел тут арты по вк, буду знать что не только сюда заливаешь)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #153495
    226 424 2 E
    post #153778
    120 219 1 E
    post #153565
    122 204 1 E
    post #153638
    4 3 2 S
    post #153637
    7 6 2 S
    post #153728
    27 23 10 S

    This meme seems to be missing the "Feral Porn" middle ground where it's just generally windy, misty, and dreary.

  • |
  • 13
  • 79 120 1 E

    Mods, you are too overzealous with these removals. At least give us time to save the file before erasing it. Please let us decide whether the quality is acceptable. Dozens of my favorites have been removed for miniscule infractions that I hadn't even noticed, and it's getting ridiculous.

  • |
  • 0
  • 28 41 1 E
    post #153657
    230 233 16 S
    post #153768
    345 594 4 E

    Very nice. Glad to finally see she's made her way over here from e621. Can't wait to see more

    Updated

  • |
  • 9
  • post #153728
    27 23 10 S
    post #153700
    114 155 7 Q

    That workshop has some odd tools in it; so I assume you asked the AI for an image of Gadget in a workshop, and because she's female it surrounded her with kitchen utensils. This would be an example of the ingrained bias that has unfortunately been carried over from reality, and into the AI models.

    Also is it wrong I clicked on this post just to see what nonsense the AI put into the background of the image?

  • |
  • 1
  • post #153772
    172 270 2 E

    skillyzee said:
    Love his expression. Like he's shell-shocked by his amazing good fortune. 😅

    The idea was about it. =)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #153700
    114 155 7 Q

    Cute, sexy hot and wet Gadget. Also the gallery sequence on Inkbunny of her stripping is very cute and sexy. Nice work. :)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #153772
    172 270 2 E

    Love his expression. Like he's shell-shocked by his amazing good fortune. 😅

  • |
  • 0
  • post #153694
    16 23 2 Q
    post #153694
    16 23 2 Q
    20 28 4 E
    post #153755
    61 88 1 E

    Gla dyou posted these! Fun to see characters like this being used in gens!

  • |
  • 1
  • 40 48 1 E
    post #153728
    27 23 10 S
    post #153660
    78 106 2 S
    post #4006
    123 157 4 E
    post #153412
    56 96 2 E

    Home early from... where, exactly? Richard isn't conceptually allowed to have a job

  • |
  • 1
  • post #4006
    123 157 4 E
    post #153470
    158 259 1 E

    Mephitids don't get enough love.

    I dig the coloration and expression.

    Nice work!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #153705
    321 436 7 E

    Wish that was me she's sitting on.

    Updated by sergalbutt


    User was banned for the contents of this message.
  • |
  • 12
  • post #153734
    125 216 1 E
    post #152743
    187 308 1 E
    post #130523
    25 33 2 E
    post #153246
    293 433 4 E
    post #130523
    25 33 2 E
    post #151728
    13 22 3 Q
    post #153728
    27 23 10 S