Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #177098
    52 68 3 E
    post #177157
    49 58 3 E
    post #177006
    133 204 2 E
    post #135621
    262 418 2 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    That is not Loona.

    we are in the early stages of local video generation, especially FURRY video generation. Don't expect prompt adherence to be perfect. I'd like to remind you that there are virtually no human beings who can create furry animations with this degree of lighting/texture realism

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177157
    49 58 3 E
    post #177177
    8 15 1 E
    post #176579
    56 72 4 E

    okt said:
    I'll just edit out the tiny human. Nice gen.

    Fortunately technology makes that a piece of cake. Happy you like it otherwise.

    furrylion said:
    I'd crawl into his sheath and stay there

    I guess that's an option ;)

    markrhey said:
    Slight size difference

    Probably just an illusion caused by the angle

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177025
    94 81 11 E

    Do you have a video or explanation of how you generate such images with different characters, or is this a trade secret?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177176
    9 4 2 S
    post #177150
    7 11 1 E
    post #177176
    9 4 2 S
    post #176579
    56 72 4 E
    post #177175
    13 18 1 E
    post #177146
    68 102 2 E
    post #175984
    37 30 4 S
    post #177166
    40 47 1 E
    post #177162
    38 55 2 E
    post #177170
    20 14 1 S
    3 4 1 E
    post #177162
    38 55 2 E
    post #176062
    30 29 1 S
    post #175984
    37 30 4 S
    post #177138
    23 22 1 E
    post #177158
    9 13 1 E

    Thank Arceus they installed the new fun toilet in the mens room. It was getting boring using just the old porcelain ones.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #177157
    49 58 3 E
    post #177025
    94 81 11 E

    terraraptor said:
    That's mostly human. I say "mostly" cause I run my text thru spelling and grammar check, which is AI, and sometimes it'll suggest a cleaner or more coherent way to phrase something. Or if I'm struggling with coming up with a made up, invented word (For instance "obdurite" mentioned on post #159340), I may ask for plausible suggestions. A lot of my picts start out with a lore draft, and the associated pict comes later. Raegul, for instance, has been an internal footnote for awhile before being featured.

    That's still about 99% human to me, IMHO. I also write and use stuff like Grammarly, so yeah. I feel AI struggles much more with writing than with art.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #176364
    72 73 4 S
    post #177142
    84 127 1 E
    post #141079
    85 119 2 E
    post #175736
    48 70 2 E
    post #160782
    38 35 1 Q
    post #177146
    68 102 2 E

    Another surprise attack by a female migrated down from Van Cougar Island. I have a feeling this one will go unreported...

    So where is this? You know, so I can avoid it. Sure.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #171862
    160 282 2 E
    post #172503
    158 270 1 E
    post #177042
    56 76 2 E
    post #123491
    256 426 5 E
    post #172229
    107 167 1 E
    post #177121
    29 36 1 E
    post #165191
    52 83 1 E
    post #166130
    55 95 2 E
    post #164482
    68 101 1 E
    23 14 1 E
    post #177148
    5 6 1 Q
    post #177091
    56 76 2 E
    post #176988
    86 103 4 E

    chastitycoyote said:
    Chair is from the other side, HR is Human Resources - in the US a HR person is the one whos job is managing all the hires/fires/intake.

    Desk seems backwards, but its the employee side of the table where you do the computer stuff at like job intake "paperwork".

    There are several visual issues with the chair. The point you raised is the first one; Even your argument is rendered useless by the other points. Secondly, the table is against the wall, leaving no room for the chair. Thirdly, if the table were to have a back panel, the chair would end up positioned inside the table itself.

    I would suggest removing the chair from the image entirely. Alternatively, you could just remove the backrest, allowing the lower section to pass as a stool. Unfortunately, AI struggles to get spatial relationships right.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177042
    56 76 2 E
    post #74632
    55 78 4 E

    Lori enjoying what she loves most and receiving it where she loves it most! Simply perfect!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177127
    18 24 1 E

    feels weird some stuff is uploaded but somehow unattributed to me.

    All tags are added by people to the extent of their knowledge and if they were uploading your stuff from /msdg/ rather than civit, then chances are they just simply didn't know who it was.

    Don't really have a desire to implement that.

    If you know which posts are yours, it's really easy to go in and tag those as yours. You can freely edit any of those posts, remove the anonymous- or unknown_director tag, and then add yours instead. Personally, I think it would be better to do it and have that out of the way for the convenience of users who want to find your stuff here. Obviously, that's still up to you in the end though.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177058
    84 105 2 E
    post #176987
    41 32 2 S
    91 132 1 E
    post #176935
    63 47 8 S

    My sense is this. What we call anthropomorphic foxes or horses or dogs or cats or other such bipedal beings that populate this site aren't anthropomorphic animals, but are zoomorphic humans. In other words, humans that have been altered to have traits similar to some cute (or sexy) animals. If you look at them you can tell the base being is human, so I don't think the subject couple is in violation of Leviticus ch 18.

    On another note, aside from mostly being about not having sex with relatives, Leviticus ch 18 also forbids you from having sex with a girl who's mensurating... Come on! We've all gotten drunk with our significant other at the wrong time of the month and the only harm was to our sheets! *sigh* Take it as you will.

    Love the romantic pieces like this on this site.

  • |
  • 1
  • 29 43 4 E
    post #152658
    113 174 5 E

    lolingtons77 said:
    I'm sorry, i didnt see this until way later looking back on old posts. If you do manage to see this, i made the Lora myslef.

    Ah, okay. I thought I could find it online. It came out really well 😉

  • |
  • 0
  • post #176974
    33 34 4 E

    srmalloy said:
    It's Natasha that has the 'cutouts' in the white markings on her face, not Lori; see https://e621.net/posts/1288361 with, left to right, Lori, Onyx, and Natasha.

    I know exactly what the three sisters look like—I've been familiar with Hardiman's art since 2007—but it's hard to get the AI to follow instructions and replicate a fur pattern 100%. I think I managed to get pretty close, though!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #174926
    102 158 3 E
    post #167377
    111 172 4 E

    nxghtfxrry said:
    You must log in with an account or email address
    to view explicit content,
    and also adjust your browsing level.

    does civetai still work without a billion limitations? I had a login and it went through some BS that would not lemme do a LOT of things u see on here.. and you had credits you get and run out of quickly..

    broken AF sometimes RN but I been using perchance.org and just google NSFW perchance.org or unlimited perchance.org because they have like 1000's of pages of different style generators some good other really bad but u eventually find a decent few & swap between them when the AI wants to be stuck on stupid...

  • |
  • 0
  • post #175734
    48 72 1 E
    post #177085
    77 85 1 E
    post #174197
    134 169 1 E

    Wow, a new meaning to sexy Bitch.. very nice, may I use this & try make her using realism commands in prompt? I always ask first & give dues to original creator..

    you will have to post original prompt, this tag soup of what looks like html and prompting language will not work in any of the generators I use, I am using Flux usually flux 2 klein "when it wants to work" and use a storyline style prompting or with curly braces when it really wants to be a pain in my ass..

  • |
  • 0
  • post #169422
    124 205 5 E
    post #174977
    108 165 8 E

    stephanieraccoon said:
    I had about maybe... 10 or so clips that came out of Seedance for this scene and I tried editing them together in a dozen different ways, some of them she looks crazy happy some she looks quite upset, my fault I guess on not being specific enough with the prompting - but with all the variations on the edits I tried i found the smoothest least jarring and most natural looking edit I came up with uses the closeup where she looks upset, thus as I said in the description this version feels a lot more rapey. I'd love to build the scene out more and get something closer to what was in my head when I started but I am sadly not made of tokens and I don't have enough excess cash to buy more right now so for now I'm stuck recutting a habd full of clips like Marge Simpson altering that same pink Chanel dress over and over

    Was she upset? or did she get her cherry popped? at least that's what I took from it, this Was WOW and Amazing video.. I was wondering are you using a website and paying for the extra time for video or do you have your own program that can do it? I have some very wild AI made images "before site I used went to hell & keeps breaking everything" and wanted to know if you would do a collab? I can do up to 10 seconds on a free but have No clue how to make it continue from last scene and have a finishing scene for video's, I only know how to do till image generations & kinda know how to animate them using the site..

    You can contact me on DM or this relay mail: 66gmjr63j@mozmail.com Thanks for your time :)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #177025
    94 81 11 E

    blake81 said:
    Been wondering for some time, do you write all these yourself or use an AI as well?

    That's mostly human. I say "mostly" cause I run my text thru spelling and grammar check, which is AI, and sometimes it'll suggest a cleaner or more coherent way to phrase something. Or if I'm struggling with coming up with a made up, invented word (For instance "obdurite" mentioned on post #159340), I may ask for plausible suggestions. A lot of my picts start out with a lore draft, and the associated pict comes later. Raegul, for instance, has been an internal footnote for awhile before being featured.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #176068
    116 142 5 E
    29 43 4 E
    post #176974
    33 34 4 E
    post #149104
    199 318 1 Q
    post #177106
    43 64 1 E
    post #177108
    41 61 1 Q
    post #176895
    62 65 7 Q
    post #176935
    63 47 8 S
    post #177058
    84 105 2 E
    post #177089
    32 43 1 E
    29 43 4 E

    slyly1997 said:
    Wow, you certainly came out with a fury of fantastic embarrassed nude shots. Hopefully these ones will stay. Have the last few you’ve done been deleted by you, or the mods?

    Moderator

  • |
  • 0
  • post #176811
    101 169 2 E