Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #172794
    42 63 5 E
    post #172833
    12 13 1 E
    post #172790
    61 89 1 E

    slopconnoisseur

    Member

    Whoever said cats and dogs are destined to be enemies was wrong, they're much better as lovers :3c

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172804
    17 22 1 E
    post #167944
    15 19 1 Q
    post #172811
    21 31 1 E
    post #172798
    2 1 1 S

    Den36

    Member

    И ты, брат, познал к чему ведут её слова: "Милый, давай купим маленькую собачку. Не волнуйся, выгуливать её буду только я".

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #122412
    321 536 3 E
    post #172808
    15 12 2 E

    zabern

    Member

    What models are you using for inpainting? I use several ponyXL and Illustrious for 2d work, and there are several canine genitalia lora's that work well.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172834
    21 24 1 E
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    zabern

    Member

    fluffbringer said:
    I don't know Balloon does it or what pipeline he uses but he is the closest i've seen to make them perfect with things like this:

    post #157334

    And this:

    post #159466

    and he has this one that i still consider the most photorealistic video i've seen of an anthro:

    post #165799

    I wonder how he got such impressive results TBH. That last one, even if the video is blurry you can see the light diffuse through her fur in the chest. It's not like all of yours are bad either some look really good like this one:

    post #148607

    But I get that video models can be trickier to get the desired result.

    The only way I have found to get it to be consistantly furry is to have the chest shown already in the frame. The first frame you see in the video is the base image I create, and there I can create furry chests. There are lots of models to work with in the image department for realistic.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172830
    29 24 1 E
    post #172813
    11 19 2 E

    n n

    Member

    grove_ellar said:
    He does a great job wearing it, he does a poor job hiding it.

    I think he is very much aware :3

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #136392
    90 123 1 E

    n n

    Member

    How did i miss this till now? This kobold is awesome!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172832
    6 4 1 E
    post #172813
    11 19 2 E
    post #111905
    162 312 4 E
    post #172809
    16 27 1 E
    post #149040
    121 204 3 E
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    FluffBringer

    Member

    zabern said:
    The biggest issue is that the models are trained on real human anatomy, as a majority of the data for photorealistic generation is real people.

    I don't know Balloon does it or what pipeline he uses but he is the closest i've seen to make them perfect with things like this:

    post #157334

    And this:

    post #159466

    and he has this one that i still consider the most photorealistic video i've seen of an anthro:

    post #165799

    I wonder how he got such impressive results TBH. That last one, even if the video is blurry you can see the light diffuse through her fur in the chest. It's not like all of yours are bad either some look really good like this one:

    post #148607

    But I get that video models can be trickier to get the desired result.

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #172808
    15 12 2 E
    post #172807
    34 40 1 E
    post #156643
    128 207 2 E
    post #172794
    42 63 5 E
    post #172801
    10 15 1 Q

    n n

    Member

    Almost made me think of the shiba inu meme XD
    Big remake, so graphic, much wow

    Seriously tho this looks damn good 👍

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172799
    25 31 3 E
    post #172794
    42 63 5 E
    post #172794
    42 63 5 E

    Qortez

    Member

    inducive-thoughts said:
    Damn it's crazy the other 2 got deleted. I saw your other posts and they looked fine to me, I even favorited them. At least you're not discouraged, hope to see the animated version

    I agree, I thought they where fine. on close examination I agree with there notes on the teeth but you had to look close to notice anything. Like I noted, it dose encourage people to only post the best and to take there time with images, so I get it.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #122995
    286 431 7 E
    post #172793
    9 8 2 S
    post #172793
    9 8 2 S
    post #172794
    42 63 5 E

    inducive-thoughts

    Member

    Damn it's crazy the other 2 got deleted. I saw your other posts and they looked fine to me, I even favorited them. At least you're not discouraged, hope to see the animated version

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #172787
    42 51 1 E
    post #172799
    25 31 3 E

    tobbe

    Member

    nocheamante said:
    Love your style with more natural sized bits and realism. Keep em coming

    Your wish is my command. And yes, part of why I'm doing this is just that, plenty of ridiculously huge bits around and not enough natural.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #172651
    110 151 6 E
    post #172751
    56 89 3 E
    post #172799
    25 31 3 E
    post #172761
    16 19 1 E
    post #163079
    21 14 6 S
    post #131986
    275 414 5 E
    post #172791
    10 10 1 S

    n n

    Member

    Not playing deadlock, so no idea who this char really is. But they look fun

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172789
    34 48 1 Q
    post #172788
    3 2 1 S
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    RedPanda

    Member

    zabern said:
    The biggest issue is that the models are trained on real human anatomy, as a majority of the data for photorealistic generation is real people.

    Then someone would need to find images or videos where this was done well and train the model on them. After all, there are quite a few images and videos here where it turned out well.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #168383
    23 10 2 Q

    Landslideorama

    Member

    Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room. A rubber room. A rubber room with rats. The rats made me crazy. Crazy? I was crazy once. They locked me in a room...

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #170766
    30 42 5 S
    post #172784
    19 22 1 E
    post #172617
    56 87 2 E
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    TouchesFluffyTail

    Member

    fluffbringer said:
    I think the only thing AI misses when it comes to photorealism is fur and boobs. For some reason, those areas often get left as bare skin with no fur, which makes them look off. For the anatomy to look natural, it needs consistent fur coverage and flow, but in a lot of these generations, the boobs just look like human boobs edited onto an otherwise photorealistic anthro body.

    My thoughts exactly. Furry tiddy best tiddy.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172779
    26 29 4 S

    TricksterFox

    Member

    gridanon said:
    Wow, very nice one TricksterFox! The expression here is excellent! Details like the sweat and fan blowing worked out well too. And the dialog is a nice touch. Well done!

    Thanks!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #172764
    2 2 1 S
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    zabern

    Member

    fluffbringer said:
    I think the only thing AI misses when it comes to photorealism is fur and boobs. For some reason, those areas often get left as bare skin with no fur, which makes them look off. For the anatomy to look natural, it needs consistent fur coverage and flow, but in a lot of these generations, the boobs just look like human boobs edited onto an otherwise photorealistic anthro body.

    The biggest issue is that the models are trained on real human anatomy, as a majority of the data for photorealistic generation is real people.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172779
    26 29 4 S

    gridanon

    Member

    Wow, very nice one TricksterFox! The expression here is excellent! Details like the sweat and fan blowing worked out well too. And the dialog is a nice touch. Well done!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #172600
    94 115 6 E
    post #172776
    46 54 1 E
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    FluffBringer

    Member

    I think the only thing AI misses when it comes to photorealism is fur and boobs. For some reason, those areas often get left as bare skin with no fur, which makes them look off. For the anatomy to look natural, it needs consistent fur coverage and flow, but in a lot of these generations, the boobs just look like human boobs edited onto an otherwise photorealistic anthro body.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172772
    11 16 7 E

    n n

    Member

    Beautiful otter that has that super-nice fur and cute feral like face ❤️

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #172768
    21 24 4 E

    n n

    Member

    Chinese but ye :P i got no idea how to add the director tag so couldn't do that as well

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #172779
    26 29 4 S

    TricksterFox

    Member

    commander said:
    "The summer in my country is really too hot for me... But I must continue to delight you with new works! Thanks for the support!"

    Hang in there; things are bound to get more pleasant again...

    Yes, i think. Thanks!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172722
    63 79 2 Q
    post #172779
    26 29 4 S

    Commander

    Member

    "The summer in my country is really too hot for me... But I must continue to delight you with new works! Thanks for the support!"

    Hang in there; things are bound to get more pleasant again...

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #144138
    111 161 1 Q
    post #172674
    4 3 1 S
    post #172768
    21 24 4 E

    celeste Shamrock

    Member

    Someone get her one of those digital translators or at least the piece's director.

    "I think I'm turning Japanese, I think I'm turning Japanese, I really think so..."

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #147914
    148 241 3 E

    n n

    Member

    I adore this beautiful bat and the grumpy blushing just makes here cuter 🥰

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172689
    21 40 2 E
    post #172705
    56 88 1 E
    post #172525
    27 10 12 E
    17 15 1 E

    n n

    Member

    谢谢你带来这件美好的事物。🤩

    "Thank you for this beauty 🤩"

  • |
  • 0
    •
    17 27 1 E

    n n

    Member

    Translation:
    "An Encounter in the Bathroom"

    😍 Super hot shower scene!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172525
    27 10 12 E

    zabern

    Member

    n_n said:
    I find these more funny / entertaining akin to the rl "Stoned Fox" or "Lion of Gripsholm Castle"

    If i was to guess why the dislikes it would be the realistic feral parts with the anthro parts sorta not forming the most realistic creature. This is a good way tho to avoid getting the post deleted because if it's TOO realistic it gets nuked.

    This is about as close as you can get wo overstepping it seems.

    Not sure if i can suggest anything as i am unable to make a proper stick figure myself, But maybe a more cartoony look with the same formula would work while still keeping the same level of realistic details?

    Tried that the mods took it down.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #172768
    21 24 4 E
    post #172768
    21 24 4 E

    n n

    Member

    Translation:
    "What would you like to eat?"

    Thank you sweetie :) i would love some macarons and for dessert who knows 😘

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #172766
    64 98 1 E
    post #172751
    56 89 3 E