directed by vbs
Viewing sample resized to 59% of original (view original) Loading...
Description

"Never seen one before? Well how about you get a closer look?"

(Wanted to experiment a bit with non-human dicks)

Blacklisted
  • Comments
  • lichking127 said:
    hah I saw the thumbnail and thought "that has to be vbs" and was not disappointed, looks awesome!

    Got me there heheh, thank you!

    The prompt (for those who don't already know) doesn't include the hands. I sketch them myself, then use img2img (recursively) to make them look natural.

    Positive: solo gynomorph, anthro, handjob, human on anthro, gynomorph water dragon, orange eyes, slit pupils, white scales, bedroom eyes, chin up, lidded eyes, smirk, big breasts, blue nipples, big wet balls, penis, tapering penis, penis towards viewer, leaking precum, prehensile penis, knotted penis, frills, horn, worm's eye view, first person view, slim gynomorph, curvy figure, foreshortening, hands on hips, tropical beach, by ultrabondagefairy, by duskihorns, by meesh, by honovy, by totesfeisch8, by Dark Gem, detailed glistening body, daylight colors, shaded, soft lighting, detailed background
    
    Negative: boring_e621_v4, easynegative, toony, backlighting, white outline, hair, long hair, no pupils, feral, overweight, hyper muscles, humanoid penis, orange sclera, thin penis, small penis

    I'll probably do another one of these, I think the view angle could be better.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 2
  • vbs said:
    The prompt (for those who don't already know) doesn't include the hands. I sketch them myself, then use img2img (recursively) to make them look natural.

    What do you mean by recursively? Really interested how you make them look so well fit-in, still struggling a lot with disembodied/offscreen hands

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • Specifically, I run it through img2img at 0.45 strength, ~40 steps (usually just the bottom half of the image, where the hands are). Once I get a good result, I run img2img on that with the same specs, rinse and repeat 3-4 times. The downside to low strength img2img is that fine details get fuzzy (stuff looks more painting-ish, instead of photorealism), but each pass through makes the color, shading, and quality on the hands better.

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1
  • vbs said:
    Specifically, I run it through img2img at 0.45 strength, ~40 steps (usually just the bottom half of the image, where the hands are). Once I get a good result, I run img2img on that with the same specs, rinse and repeat 3-4 times. The downside to low strength img2img is that fine details get fuzzy (stuff looks more painting-ish, instead of photorealism), but each pass through makes the color, shading, and quality on the hands better.

    you didn't quote me that's why I didn't see your answer, I know you already replied but thanks anyways! :D

  • Reply
  • |
  • 1