Topic: Censored_Genitalia Fix BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

flowersylveon said:
The bulk update request #437 is pending approval.

create implication censored_pussy (52) -> censored_genitalia (7)
create implication censored_penis (20) -> censored_genitalia (7)
remove implication censored_pussy (52) -> censored (119)
remove implication censored_penis (20) -> censored (119)

Reason: correct format

I don't know how the script system works (so to take with a grain of salt), but I wonder if it'll work in 1 bur.

Since both censored_p* AND censored_genitalia already imply censored, I wonder if Ponies going to get a transitive error.

Ideally the script would do the "remove" commands before the "create" ones, but if not, it might just fail.

Anyway, forgive my musings

kalethorebiter said:
I don't know how the script system works (so to take with a grain of salt), but I wonder if it'll work in 1 bur.

Since both censored_p* AND censored_genitalia already imply censored, I wonder if Ponies going to get a transitive error.

Ideally the script would do the "remove" commands before the "create" ones, but if not, it might just fail.

Anyway, forgive my musings

this is an implication
not alias
it's a different frame work
you don't need separated processses for implications as you can do it in one go