Topic: Tag alias: seductor -> seductive

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

kalethorebiter said:
I don't know, seductor is someone who's flirty. That's not a big nuance, but the alias doesn't sit right in my head.

Implication might be better

When seductive, bedroom_eyes and other relevant tags exist, I don't think it's necessary.
And while I know we're not e621 and are working to somewhat diverge from how they tag things, that is a zero count tag over there

sergalbutt said:
When seductive, bedroom_eyes and other relevant tags exist, I don't think it's necessary.
And while I know we're not e621 and are working to somewhat diverge from how they tag things, that is a zero count tag over there

Almost 0 to be pedantic (10 posts),

I don't have any strong reason to oppose. I guess my point is seductor is a thing we can see (a character being flirty) and seductive is anything that can seduce?.. Is the concept of "being seductive" something subjective? I dunno...

kalethorebiter said:
Almost 0 to be pedantic (10 posts),

I don't have any strong reason to oppose. I guess my point is seductor is a thing we can see (a character being flirty) and seductive is anything that can seduce?.. Is the concept of "being seductive" something subjective? I dunno...

I said zero seductor on e621.
And the tag wiki definition of 'seductive' does basically define what would be seductor