The bulk update request #197 is pending approval.

create implication bahamut_lagoon (0) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication chrono_trigger (0) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication dragon_quest (1) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication drakengard (0) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication final_fantasy (26) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication kingdom_hearts (2) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication mana_(series) (6) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication neo_the_world_ends_with_you (0) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication octopath_traveler (0) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication radiata_stories (0) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication star_ocean (0) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication taito (0) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication the_world_ends_with_you (0) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication thief_(series) (0) -> square_eninx (0)
create implication valkyrie_profile (0) -> square_eninx (0)

Reason: e621 port of tags
this is just so it's easier for me later to what else i should take a look to make more BURs

"Just because the implications exist on e621" is not a valid reason to add implication tags to e6ai as well. You are not thinking about how it can benefit the community when you act that way.

The reason you should provide for making these types of BURs should be: "Why is it useful for the e6ai community to add parent copyright company tag to all franchises that doesn't respect the Tag What You See rule, isn't useful for future AI training and isn't even useful for searching and narrowing down content you want to see."

Until someone can provide me with an example why a company name would ever be useful for finding content they like more easily on e6ai, I'm still fairly opposed to enforcing copyright tags on art that isn't even subject to copyright under the current law.