Topic: [BUR] Missing Pal_(species) Implications (and one alias)

dfY6C

Privileged

The bulk update request #761 is active.

create implication foxparks_cryst (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication caprity_noct (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication loupmoon_cryst (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication gorirat_terra (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication kitsun_noct (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication dazzi_noct (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication bushi_noct (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication katress_ignis (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication wixen_noct (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication cryolinx_terra (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication warsect_terra (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication fenglope_lux (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication quivern_botan (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication helzephyr_lux (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication menasting_terra (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication faleris_aqua (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication mimog (0) -> pal_(species) (251)
create implication azumane (0) -> pal_(species) (251)

Reason: Using the pal_(species) list as a reference, these tags are ones that did not have any existing implications set for them.

EDIT: The bulk update request #761 (forum #5035) has been approved by @Jelloponies.

Updated by auto moderator