Topic: [APPROVED] [BUR] Missing some thigh highs implications

Oarebt

Former Staff

The bulk update request #617 is active.

create implication single_thigh_highs (1) -> thigh_highs (3809)
create implication fishnet_thigh_highs (66) -> thigh_highs (3809)
create implication latex_thigh_highs (37) -> thigh_highs (3809)
create implication thigh_highs_only (12) -> thigh_highs (3809)
create implication toeless_thigh_highs (8) -> thigh_highs (3809)

Reason: <x>_thigh_highs or thigh_highs_<x> imply thigh_highs

EDIT: The bulk update request #617 (forum #4382) has been approved by @Jelloponies.

Updated by auto moderator

  • Parent
  • Endorsements

    • Technical-Grid endorsed this tag change request.
    • Kaleth endorsed this tag change request.
    • dfY6C endorsed this tag change request.