Topic: [Tag request] De-implicate Dominant from Big_Dom_Small_Sub

The bulk update request #440 is active.

create alias big_on_bottom (0) -> smaller_on_top (32)
create alias bigger_on_bottom (0) -> smaller_on_top (32)
create alias large_on_bottom (0) -> smaller_on_top (32)
create alias larger_on_bottom (0) -> smaller_on_top (32)
create alias small_on_top (0) -> smaller_on_top (32)
create implication big_dom_small_sub (513) -> submissive (2845)
create implication small_dom_big_sub (331) -> submissive (2845)
create implication small_dom_big_sub (331) -> dominant (3324)
create implication big_on_top (0) -> size_difference (6686)
create implication smaller_on_top (32) -> size_difference (6686)
remove alias bigger_on_top (21) -> larger_on_top (7)

Reason: Several

Follow Up

alias small_on_bottom -> bigger_on_top
alias smaller_on_bottom -> bigger_on_top
alias big_on_top -> bigger_on_top
alias large_on_top -> bigger_on_top
alias larger_on_top -> bigger_on_top

1. Creating/Taking into account new tags that can be use in size_difference outside of sexual encounter and/or non-BDSM sexual scenes.

2. Looking at all the alias for big_dom_small_sub, the submissive implication is needed.

3. To match big_dom_small_sub, the 2 next implications are needed

4. Create implications for new tags

EDIT: The bulk update request #440 (forum #3817) has failed: Error: Antecedent tag must not be aliased to another tag (create implication small_on_top -> size_difference)

EDIT: The bulk update request #440 (forum #3817) has been approved by @Jelloponies.

Updated by auto moderator