Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #177091
    41 62 2 E
    post #176988
    82 92 4 E

    RedPanda

    Member

    chastitycoyote said:
    Chair is from the other side, HR is Human Resources - in the US a HR person is the one whos job is managing all the hires/fires/intake.

    Desk seems backwards, but its the employee side of the table where you do the computer stuff at like job intake "paperwork".

    There are several visual issues with the chair. The point you raised is the first one; Even your argument is rendered useless by the other points. Secondly, the table is against the wall, leaving no room for the chair. Thirdly, if the table were to have a back panel, the chair would end up positioned inside the table itself.

    I would suggest removing the chair from the image entirely. Alternatively, you could just remove the backrest, allowing the lower section to pass as a stool. Unfortunately, AI struggles to get spatial relationships right.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177042
    46 60 1 E
    post #74632
    55 78 4 E

    Q-Player

    Member

    Lori enjoying what she loves most and receiving it where she loves it most! Simply perfect!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177127
    14 16 1 E

    dfY6C

    Privileged

    feels weird some stuff is uploaded but somehow unattributed to me.

    All tags are added by people to the extent of their knowledge and if they were uploading your stuff from /msdg/ rather than civit, then chances are they just simply didn't know who it was.

    Don't really have a desire to implement that.

    If you know which posts are yours, it's really easy to go in and tag those as yours. You can freely edit any of those posts, remove the anonymous- or unknown_director tag, and then add yours instead. Personally, I think it would be better to do it and have that out of the way for the convenience of users who want to find your stuff here. Obviously, that's still up to you in the end though.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177058
    66 87 2 E
    post #176987
    40 32 2 S
    post #177092
    77 109 1 E
    post #176935
    61 40 8 S

    medicineball

    Member

    My sense is this. What we call anthropomorphic foxes or horses or dogs or cats or other such bipedal beings that populate this site aren't anthropomorphic animals, but are zoomorphic humans. In other words, humans that have been altered to have traits similar to some cute (or sexy) animals. If you look at them you can tell the base being is human, so I don't think the subject couple is in violation of Leviticus ch 18.

    On another note, aside from mostly being about not having sex with relatives, Leviticus ch 18 also forbids you from having sex with a girl who's mensurating... Come on! We've all gotten drunk with our significant other at the wrong time of the month and the only harm was to our sheets! *sigh* Take it as you will.

    Love the romantic pieces like this on this site.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    30 43 4 E
    post #152658
    113 174 5 E

    furryhot1

    Member

    lolingtons77 said:
    I'm sorry, i didnt see this until way later looking back on old posts. If you do manage to see this, i made the Lora myslef.

    Ah, okay. I thought I could find it online. It came out really well 😉

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #176974
    33 34 4 E

    Q-Player

    Member

    srmalloy said:
    It's Natasha that has the 'cutouts' in the white markings on her face, not Lori; see https://e621.net/posts/1288361 with, left to right, Lori, Onyx, and Natasha.

    I know exactly what the three sisters look like—I've been familiar with Hardiman's art since 2007—but it's hard to get the AI to follow instructions and replicate a fur pattern 100%. I think I managed to get pretty close, though!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #174926
    101 157 3 E
    post #167377
    111 171 4 E

    dark furry nexus

    Member

    nxghtfxrry said:
    You must log in with an account or email address
    to view explicit content,
    and also adjust your browsing level.

    does civetai still work without a billion limitations? I had a login and it went through some BS that would not lemme do a LOT of things u see on here.. and you had credits you get and run out of quickly..

    broken AF sometimes RN but I been using perchance.org and just google NSFW perchance.org or unlimited perchance.org because they have like 1000's of pages of different style generators some good other really bad but u eventually find a decent few & swap between them when the AI wants to be stuck on stupid...

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #175734
    47 72 1 E
    post #177085
    55 63 1 E
    post #174197
    134 169 1 E

    dark furry nexus

    Member

    Wow, a new meaning to sexy Bitch.. very nice, may I use this & try make her using realism commands in prompt? I always ask first & give dues to original creator..

    you will have to post original prompt, this tag soup of what looks like html and prompting language will not work in any of the generators I use, I am using Flux usually flux 2 klein "when it wants to work" and use a storyline style prompting or with curly braces when it really wants to be a pain in my ass..

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #169422
    124 206 5 E
    post #174977
    108 165 8 E

    dark furry nexus

    Member

    stephanieraccoon said:
    I had about maybe... 10 or so clips that came out of Seedance for this scene and I tried editing them together in a dozen different ways, some of them she looks crazy happy some she looks quite upset, my fault I guess on not being specific enough with the prompting - but with all the variations on the edits I tried i found the smoothest least jarring and most natural looking edit I came up with uses the closeup where she looks upset, thus as I said in the description this version feels a lot more rapey. I'd love to build the scene out more and get something closer to what was in my head when I started but I am sadly not made of tokens and I don't have enough excess cash to buy more right now so for now I'm stuck recutting a habd full of clips like Marge Simpson altering that same pink Chanel dress over and over

    Was she upset? or did she get her cherry popped? at least that's what I took from it, this Was WOW and Amazing video.. I was wondering are you using a website and paying for the extra time for video or do you have your own program that can do it? I have some very wild AI made images "before site I used went to hell & keeps breaking everything" and wanted to know if you would do a collab? I can do up to 10 seconds on a free but have No clue how to make it continue from last scene and have a finishing scene for video's, I only know how to do till image generations & kinda know how to animate them using the site..

    You can contact me on DM or this relay mail: 66gmjr63j@mozmail.com Thanks for your time :)

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177025
    87 73 9 E

    TerraRaptor

    Privileged

    blake81 said:
    Been wondering for some time, do you write all these yourself or use an AI as well?

    That's mostly human. I say "mostly" cause I run my text thru spelling and grammar check, which is AI, and sometimes it'll suggest a cleaner or more coherent way to phrase something. Or if I'm struggling with coming up with a made up, invented word (For instance "obdurite" mentioned on post #159340), I may ask for plausible suggestions. A lot of my picts start out with a lore draft, and the associated pict comes later. Raegul, for instance, has been an internal footnote for awhile before being featured.

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #176068
    116 140 5 E
    30 43 4 E
    post #176974
    33 34 4 E
    post #149104
    199 318 1 Q
    post #177106
    33 48 1 E
    post #177108
    32 46 1 Q
    post #176895
    61 63 7 Q
    post #176935
    61 40 8 S
    post #177058
    66 87 2 E
    post #177089
    27 36 1 E
    30 43 4 E

    AnomalyPony

    Member

    slyly1997 said:
    Wow, you certainly came out with a fury of fantastic embarrassed nude shots. Hopefully these ones will stay. Have the last few you’ve done been deleted by you, or the mods?

    Moderator

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #176811
    99 166 2 E
    post #176972
    13 7 9 S

    Q-Player

    Member

    jjjjj88888 said:
    Bienvenido! Me encantan las zorrillas! Siempre lindas, hermosas y muy sexy!

    Gracias por el saludo amigo! Si, las otras mofetas en el fandom son hermosas pero todas palidecen frente al trio skunkworks, sin mencionar a su madre! XD

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #176935
    61 40 8 S

    RenegadeC

    Member

    mercrantos said:
    I would say she is in animal in the biological sense, in that she is obviously not human, but she is clearly a person in the same way the man next to her is. If anthros existed they would be deserving of the same rights humans have but we don't really need to worry about this in the real world.

    A chimera if anything.If she is bipedal with tool using hands then there is likely some humanoid DNA in the makeup. Also, the hair ( not fur ) she is sporting is another humanoid trait.

    And no, not something to worry about. Yet...
    Do not discount that mankind has a nasty habit of trying to play God.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #176029
    86 112 8 E
    post #175870
    50 37 4 Q
    post #173387
    52 95 1 E
    post #176972
    13 7 9 S
    post #177098
    34 50 2 E
    post #177098
    34 50 2 E
    post #177032
    46 75 1 E
    post #177091
    41 62 2 E
    post #176925
    98 110 2 E

    yiffysan

    Member

    zheneric said:
    Ohhh yeah here we go! Cheek squish, shaft lick, and call fondling, Warning clearly knows what she's doing

    ultimate cock worship

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177100
    5 3 1 S
    post #177099
    45 62 1 E
    post #177097
    47 65 1 E
    post #177101
    48 70 1 E
    post #126508
    103 154 2 E

    C32

    Member

    Nooooooooooo dont gooo :( you are honestly the best at making unconventionally attractive creatures

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177075
    11 22 1 E
    post #177047
    28 25 1 S
    post #177081
    55 82 1 E
    post #151982
    341 540 3 E
    post #177090
    64 97 1 E
    post #176935
    61 40 8 S

    mercrantos

    Member

    renegadec said:
    I have to question this. She is obviously sentient, has demonstrable cognition ( a book in her hands ) and is self aware ( yes, she is enjoying her coffee, tea, whatever ) and apparently able to understand / communicate with her companion. So, by the conventional meaning is she an animal? Anthropomorphism and genetic modification seems to change the rules.

    I would say she is in animal in the biological sense, in that she is obviously not human, but she is clearly a person in the same way the man next to her is. If anthros existed they would be deserving of the same rights humans have but we don't really need to worry about this in the real world.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #177025
    87 73 9 E
    post #177046
    44 46 2 E

    comet husky

    Member

    shblue said:
    Reminds me of this YT rec I keep getting of Brian Swords pieces auctioned live on WITF-TV in 1988. Anyway, cute! Can't say murid without murr~

    Very true actually!!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #176935
    61 40 8 S

    Miestwin

    Member

    renegadec said:
    I have to question this. She is obviously sentient, has demonstrable cognition ( a book in her hands ) and is self aware ( yes, she is enjoying her coffee, tea, whatever ) and apparently able to understand / communicate with her companion. So, by the conventional meaning is she an animal? Anthropomorphism and genetic modification seems to change the rules.

    I'd say no.
    Even by baseline logic, if someone says "animal", the first thing that probably will come to your mind, is a four-legged being that eats off the ground, and bolts (or attacks) the moment it sees you, not someONE clothed, drinking from a cup, and saying "hello" spotting you.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177080
    79 106 1 E
    18 23 1 S
    post #177027
    76 112 2 E
    post #177025
    87 73 9 E
    post #176829
    51 55 4 E
    30 43 4 E

    Slyly1997

    Member

    Wow, you certainly came out with a fury of fantastic embarrassed nude shots. Hopefully these ones will stay. Have the last few you’ve done been deleted by you, or the mods?

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #176969
    111 160 3 E
    post #175987
    103 158 9 E

    Alpha Doberman

    Member

    Phew. Lol. And which of these two actually came up with the idea of comparing penis and ball sizes? And what was Fennec even expecting, considering Nick is taller and bigger than him? Accordingly, if Nick is bigger and taller, then his penis and balls will be larger than Fennec's. Doesn't that make sense?! But I still really want to know which of the two of them was the first to suggest making peace with their sizes and why?

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #176989
    5 6 1 E

    MikuBraver

    Member

    "Since the beginning of time, man has yearned to destroy the sun. I will do the next best thing: block it out." xD

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #177065
    36 53 1 E
    post #176935
    61 40 8 S

    RenegadeC

    Member

    I have to question this. She is obviously sentient, has demonstrable cognition ( a book in her hands ) and is self aware ( yes, she is enjoying her coffee, tea, whatever ) and apparently able to understand / communicate with her companion. So, by the conventional meaning is she an animal? Anthropomorphism and genetic modification seems to change the rules.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177040
    41 53 1 S
    post #177048
    31 33 1 E
    post #176964
    39 49 1 E
    post #177025
    87 73 9 E
    post #177025
    87 73 9 E
    post #176972
    13 7 9 S

    Q-Player

    Member

    maverick039 said:
    Primero: BRUTAL

    Segundo: Que ricas están esas zorrillas, son una de las razones que me volví furro.

    Ellas fueron el inicio en el fandom de muchos!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #177025
    87 73 9 E

    TerraRaptor

    Privileged

    dews41 said:
    Also, you know this soldier means business when she wears armor on her groin.

    Hah, well, that one's a male (as is the tutor). But given my track record with posting female anthros and the minimal sexual dimorphism, the mixup was expected. I tried to give the females a curvier figure and the whole eyelash thing to give some subtle visual cues, at least.

    To add to the confusion, in Midrian lore, the trili are among the more likely of species to join their female counterparts in bottomless fashion (such as the tutor there).

  • |
  • 1
    •