Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #175483
    34 49 2 E
    20 17 2 Q
    7 14 2 E
    7 14 2 E
    12 15 1 E
    post #175399
    68 69 3 Q
    post #175050
    80 128 1 E
    post #145092
    61 106 2 E
    post #174440
    176 258 2 E
    post #171076
    99 162 1 E
    post #175473
    7 11 2 S
    20 17 2 Q
    post #174895
    64 67 2 S
    post #175470
    82 117 1 E
    post #175388
    55 88 1 E
    post #175406
    27 29 1 Q
    post #175491
    35 45 1 E
    post #175492
    40 52 1 E
    58 74 1 E
    post #175430
    87 106 2 E
    post #175483
    34 49 2 E
    post #175485
    44 50 1 Q
    post #175488
    3 4 1 E
    post #175486
    32 41 1 E
    post #175006
    157 200 3 E

    wherewolf said:
    she's sweet, pretty, and sexy without the image or her attributes being over the top. Nicely done!

    this. Her being always angry and bitchy in every effin picture is getting really old

  • |
  • 0
  • post #175391
    10 4 2 S
    post #175363
    114 147 3 E
    post #175440
    42 59 5 E

    That cock looks so deliciously suckable...
    One of the most realistic feline cocks I've seen genned. Very nice!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #175473
    7 11 2 S
    post #175362
    84 97 3 E
    post #134342
    237 413 4 E
    post #174403
    94 129 4 E
    post #175446
    1 1 1 Q
    post #175463
    39 46 2 Q
    post #175440
    42 59 5 E

    kamril said:
    There's "slightly_chubby".

    But I wouldn't think he qualifies. It's more the skin being loose from the crouched posture.

    Maybe a bit... "Very" slightly chubby... He's definitely got a bit of that waistband-overhang going on, very slightly... He's just not thin-and-toned! Well... if you consider "Fluffy's" "Five levels of fatness," Big, healthy, husky, fluffy, and "Daamn!"

    This guy is "slightly big." But I'd say "slightly chubby" is applicable. I'm good with that!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #175440
    42 59 5 E
    post #174332
    159 213 2 E
    post #174326
    40 67 1 E
    post #174309
    118 195 1 E

    Just a personal preference, but I really prefer images like this where you can see the whole pony rather than just a big ass in your face. After all, I'm in love with all of Applejack, not just her butt😜

  • |
  • 0
  • post #174305
    102 161 1 E
    95 132 6 E
    post #174300
    4 7 1 Q
    95 132 6 E
    95 132 6 E
    post #174297
    34 46 1 Q
    post #175463
    39 46 2 Q
    post #175351
    85 109 3 E

    May I ask what model was used. This sure a shack beats pony realism or is this a lora

  • |
  • 1
  • post #175134
    113 175 7 E

    zippersandlace said:
    The soft feel and sensual attention that comes out of this are just fantastic. Excellent work!
    I'm curious, what sort of limits are there on length for something like this? What would go in to making longer form animations?

    It could probably be longer and I would like very much to try but I'll be running up an AI model that probably doesn't actually realize what it is doing and that will be mad if it figures that out.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #175457
    41 40 1 S
    post #175436
    11 16 1 E
    post #175192
    76 106 1 E
    post #175306
    7 2 1 S
    post #175411
    45 55 2 Q
    67 78 1 E
    95 132 6 E
    post #175445
    61 68 1 E
    post #175443
    20 34 1 E
    post #175321
    75 108 2 E
    post #175434
    34 38 1 Q

    Gorgeous beauty. Talk about a heavenly paradise. 💕

    Love those flowers in her hair. Very pretty!

  • |
  • 1
  • 42 50 1 Q

    This is wonderfully romantic. Nice job!

    And of course Diane in all her naked glory. Love that foxy tush. 🧡

  • |
  • 0
  • post #175448
    56 72 2 E
    post #175448
    56 72 2 E
    post #175440
    42 59 5 E

    kifuusaki said:
    I wonder if there's a better suited tag for this, because he's only "Slightly husky" sized... Which honestly is stunning.

    There's "slightly_chubby".

    But I wouldn't think he qualifies. It's more the skin being loose from the crouched posture.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #175440
    42 59 5 E

    I normally keep "overweight" on my blacklist for the "hyper overweight" reasons. I am SO glad I checked! I wonder if there's a better suited tag for this, because he's only "Slightly husky" sized... Which honestly is stunning.

    This guy is doing something to me and I think I'm in love... ❤️

  • |
  • 2
  • post #175429
    9 5 3 Q
    95 132 6 E
    post #175397
    55 55 1 Q
    post #175428
    14 6 1 S
    95 132 6 E
    post #175356
    34 40 1 Q
    post #175351
    85 109 3 E
    post #175411
    45 55 2 Q
    post #145625
    112 160 10 E

    bagelmonster said:
    Check the parent post's catbox link, I included instructions there on how to set up VisionDepth3D and run it on a video. You may end up pleasantly surprised at how quickly the depth mapping and stereogram generation processes take! Roughly 3 mins for mapping, 40 seconds for stereogram generation on the parent video with a 3090. Even if you have a very old GPU there's models you can use with limited VRAM and I doubt a run would take a super long time.

    I'm going to test this with stills first. very exciting work

  • |
  • 0
  • post #175256
    21 8 2 S
    post #175423
    100 142 2 E