Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #138513
    292 566 4 E
    93 142 13 E

    WC Latrans

    Member

    alaskan_huzky said:
    Why I'm getting negative dislikes just for pointing out the truth? People in here are so stupid, is not like I'm the one banning it... don't take it on me.

    I didn't down vote you but I can guess at some of the reasons why people might have.

    It would seem in general that the users of this site dislike this policy, at least if this post's vote ratio is to be believed. And even though you don't set the policy, and I assume from one of your replies that you don't necessarily agree with this policy, people will still reflexively down vote. The 'shoot the messenger' phenomenon.

    With the way your original comment is phrased "Looks too realistic, may get nuked.", it is ambiguous as to whether you support this policy or not. Some users may have taken this as approval or encouragement of any such action.

    It may also be the case that people think your comment draws attention to the (allegedly) realistic style of this post, and they are hoping if no one says anything perhaps it will slip through unnoticed. Plus it could potentially add weight to the decision to remove the post, as in "Oh look, even the users notice how (allegedly) realistic this post is".

    I don't know how likely that last one is, and it seems unlikely that anything you or anyone else said would have any bearing on the decision here. For the record I don't agree with the guideline banning explicit realistic feral images/videos.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #138402
    190 328 1 E
    post #131877
    86 144 1 E
    post #138595
    310 513 3 E
    177 332 4 E
    post #138542
    201 285 3 E
    post #38789
    83 113 1 E
    post #138562
    56 80 1 E
    post #138084
    448 672 13 E
    post #138505
    116 181 6 Q
    110 173 1 E
    post #136252
    219 341 2 E
    post #138567
    153 192 5 E
    post #138573
    78 127 1 E
    109 177 1 E
    170 286 3 E
    post #138498
    238 361 1 Q
    post #128964
    104 175 1 E
    post #116054
    86 133 1 Q
    post #138513
    292 566 4 E
    post #138530
    121 136 3 S

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    This is my favorite type of video. Just enough movement to bring a great picture to life, but avoiding the uncanny valley of trying to create movement that the ai isn't quite ready to handle

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #138537
    111 190 3 E
    post #138543
    215 381 10 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    And natural selection would never create pupils that become heart shaped during mating. Very unscientific🧐

  • |
  • 6
    •
    post #138569
    175 293 2 Q
    63 86 2 E

    withthefur

    Member

    Could you repost with a fix? I thought it was perfect and was just about to save it.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    238 371 2 E

    Bjsd

    Member

    A great view. truly one of the best ways of presenting.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #138569
    175 293 2 Q
    post #124622
    128 183 1 E
    post #138576
    29 38 2 Q
    post #138576
    29 38 2 Q
    post #138545
    115 152 1 Q
    post #121802
    13 12 2 E
    post #138397
    144 241 5 E
    post #138539
    241 442 1 E
    post #37055
    38 7 6 Q
    post #118481
    263 448 2 E
    post #133586
    177 283 1 E
    post #118353
    89 164 1 E
    post #138519
    308 544 2 E
    post #138489
    198 321 4 E
    post #138513
    292 566 4 E
    post #138365
    141 244 3 E
    post #138536
    299 476 1 Q
    post #138516
    66 70 5 Q
    post #138568
    109 203 1 E
    post #138519
    308 544 2 E
    post #135125
    90 93 7 Q

    TrashPanda0997

    Member

    This is very exciting! I'm glad you are back with more lovely otters <3 Good to see you again my friend

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #138040
    43 44 1 S
    post #138071
    653 1.3k 13 E
    19 37 1 E
    post #138543
    215 381 10 E

    Pachurisu

    Blocked

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    What's even the point of pointing out inconsistencies with real life when you are talking about fictional animals..? Especially when said animal has a humanoid pussy in the first place. I honestly fail to understand.

  • |
  • 11
    •
    post #138549
    186 346 1 E
    post #130813
    222 346 1 E
    post #138510
    176 261 1 E
    post #138543
    215 381 10 E

    Honeywp

    Member

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    Provide examples! 😍

  • |
  • 8
    •
    post #138499
    277 454 5 E
    post #138468
    128 188 2 Q
    post #138486
    106 163 2 E
    post #138504
    89 104 1 Q
    post #138505
    116 181 6 Q
    post #138466
    174 332 1 E
    post #135941
    180 316 2 E

    CapybaraXeon

    Member

    That's perfect. If it's not too much trouble, what do you use to generate it? It seems to me you only use a template, that's perfect.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #138254
    137 218 3 E
    post #138541
    116 216 2 E
    post #136748
    107 101 12 S

    Namsi

    Member

    You have just generated the counterpart to the Mona Lisa's smile - furry style.

    I'll be coming back here anytime I feel down. That smile is heartwarming AF.
    Apologies if I'm being a creep here right now. :<

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #136741
    115 162 6 Q

    Namsi

    Member

    That level of realism and detailed fur/hair is... "stunning" wouldn't begin to describe it.
    And not just that. The detail on every rose, the paws, the irregularity of the fur... it's beyond anything i have seen generated.

    Makes me want to stop generating and posting anything really :x

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #138431
    64 118 1 E
    post #138489
    198 321 4 E
    post #138542
    201 285 3 E
    238 371 2 E
    38 47 5 E

    Hammapajamma

    Member

    tsuruchi said:
    Hunh. Would you believe me if I told you I didn't even pay attention to that at all? I do use negative prompts, "Signature, watermark, logo, patreon, name", but even doing that they still pop in and I don't catch them. Thanks for the heads up.
    I'll scrutinize and post another one, I'm just kinda "testing the waters" for uploading images.

    Heh, yeah I believe it. It's easy to miss little errors, and they're really strict about it here, so you'd be well advised to really scrutinize your stuff with a fine-tooth comb. Extra fingers/toes, weird-looking fingers or uneven numbers of them, misshapen eyes or even nostrils, JPG compression, AI signatures... they're all grounds for merciless deletion. 😮

    Well, like raiinbow dash pointed out, you can always remove this one by hand or crop it out, that's easy enough. Then you can just reupload it and it should pass, I think.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #137869
    45 54 1 E
    post #138518
    34 30 1 S
    24 44 2 E