Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #116983
    223 400 6 E

    hammapajamma said:
    I didn't, but it's typically seen as unpolite to ask for alt versions without at least giving some commentary on the one that's there. More so if it's short-form like "other version plz", which just sounds a bit ungrateful.

    Hm, yeah, true, I can see how it can be seen as unpolite now, you got a point

  • |
  • 0
  • post #113610
    30 40 3 S
    post #117094
    107 161 5 Q

    thataustrian said:
    Trailer park possums, always liked the possum girl ngl, auntie is packing heat

    Auntie has a pistol, too. 10/10 would accept that dinner invite.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #116125
    495 873 12 E

    jorble said:
    Bruh this is a website featuring primarily AI Furry porn, no one cares about your political agendas.

    Well.... in this case, it could be something in universe.

    All Cops Are Bitches. And they want the D.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #117115
    166 303 1 Q
    post #117112
    427 875 5 E
    post #117094
    107 161 5 Q
    post #117095
    62 77 3 S
    post #117092
    104 114 2 S
    post #117104
    344 595 5 E

    damnedfurry said:
    Animation's good, but that cock size/length...lol

    Yeah, for some reason the models can't (or at least I can't make them) generate the tip of the penis, so when character moves its head/butt it just keeps extending...
    Till it looks like the guy has been eating viagra for breakfast :p

  • |
  • 4
  • post #117104
    344 595 5 E
    post #117095
    62 77 3 S
    post #117056
    86 137 2 E

    falsgart said:
    Starfish jam, my favorite!

    That model had like, no concept of peanuts.
    giving it just the promt peanut made it create cats.
    This star of maybe roasted peanuts melted together is as close as it'd let me get.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #117094
    107 161 5 Q
    post #117019
    211 409 7 E

    googous said:
    Clearer. Less grainy. They look lofi(meaning low fidelity or grainy/unclear) but not in a good way. And to be clear, I'm not trying to complain. It's still very good.

    https://limewire.com/d/kRZ4b#5rFJybiTeB

    Look you think that one is better? If not it probally somenthing with the upscaler for the original image

  • |
  • 1
  • post #117019
    211 409 7 E

    googous said:
    Clearer. Less grainy. They look lofi(meaning low fidelity or grainy/unclear) but not in a good way. And to be clear, I'm not trying to complain. It's still very good.

    I know man, I didn't take anything as a complaint, I do everything online, so I don't understand much of the terms, about lofi, when this post is deleted (it probably will be) I'll try to redo it using a similar image but changing some things like trying to change the size of the image, then fix the quality and do the same after the video (the problem I saw with this was that it ends up erasing some details)

  • |
  • 2
  • post #117019
    211 409 7 E

    beerwolf said:
    There's a ribbon growing off his foot that seems to be leaking something. :P

    I really hadn't seen that part, the more I watch the worse this video gets :(

  • |
  • 0
  • post #117076
    381 686 4 E
    post #97253
    357 664 2 E

    Yes! She has taken her pants after a long workday to sit on my face… her dirty pussy and ass is the best reward for me!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #117076
    381 686 4 E

    Wowee! Nice, smooth, and beautiful with good visible penetration. What'd you use?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #117076
    381 686 4 E
    post #117066
    481 892 5 E

    Incredible! What do you use? I'm guessing SD/Wan local gen? I can only use online img2vid with basic prompts.
    I'm finding it impossible to get any kind of penetration, thrusting, sucking, or stroking in my videos. Looping is tough too.

  • |
  • 1
  • 71 131 1 E

    To find a nice, nude huge_butt without exposed giant detailed genitals is painfully rare in the AI space

  • |
  • 0
  • post #117056
    86 137 2 E
    post #117085
    65 73 1 S
    31 40 3 Q
    post #116874
    154 273 2 E
    post #117080
    152 252 2 E
    post #117066
    481 892 5 E

    This is the third time he's been captured this week. We're starting to think he's doing it on purpose.

  • |
  • 8
  • post #117080
    152 252 2 E
    post #116830
    87 170 2 E
    post #117075
    258 441 2 E
    post #116865
    338 617 2 E
    post #116983
    223 400 6 E

    kaltingale said:
    Why are they getting downvoted? Even if I'm not going to do a female version, I don't see anything wrong with asking for it. What's the issue here?

    I didn't, but it's typically seen as impolite to ask for alt versions without at least giving some commentary on the one that's there. More so if it's short-form like "other version plz", which just sounds a bit ungrateful.

    Updated

  • |
  • 6
  • post #117004
    112 151 2 E
    post #117020
    126 178 1 E
    post #116905
    267 509 2 E
    post #117066
    481 892 5 E
    post #117066
    481 892 5 E
    post #117028
    239 386 2 E
    post #75416
    29 39 1 S

    "No... Just no one wants me..."

    Precious cub needs to be adopted!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #117068
    154 253 1 E

    Prob gonna get removed since the first one in the series did, trying to dispute it but waiting on a reply

  • |
  • 5
  • post #116843
    66 61 13 S
    post #37267
    74 109 2 E
    post #116605
    262 503 4 E

    Could you do one with a human male instead of the fox?Same with the previous image with the hot female bear.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #116493
    82 107 5 S

    oldhroft said:
    This is a sure way to make the birb blush even more =D

    I'd want to hear the nervous chirping. It's sure to be adorable.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #116931
    233 380 6 E

    TR

    Member

    that must feel weird for both of them. now Im interested.

  • |
  • 1
  • 95 120 28 S
    post #117041
    106 186 2 E
    post #115943
    275 429 4 E
    post #116866
    314 617 1 E
    post #116958
    113 224 2 E
    post #117014
    98 156 1 E
    post #117040
    146 195 5 E

    I am a BIG fan of the new direction they went with the natives in this Indiana Jones reboot.

    Edit: not sure why the down votes. If this was offensive in some way, it wasn't intended. 😥

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
  • post #117004
    112 151 2 E
    post #117019
    211 409 7 E

    dr_plant said:
    uhh, english is not my native language can you explain it to me? you mean it being rougher?

    Clearer. Less grainy. They look lofi(meaning low fidelity or grainy/unclear) but not in a good way. And to be clear, I'm not trying to complain. It's still very good.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #112027
    217 422 3 E
    post #115798
    183 316 2 E
    post #116491
    779 1.4k 17 E
    post #116552
    309 545 4 E
    post #116619
    110 173 1 Q
    post #116983
    223 400 6 E
    post #116701
    69 117 1 E
    post #117030
    50 58 1 Q

    Another good one. There are some slight errors with the water and chain, but I'm impressed with what you're pulling off with AI.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #116851
    243 408 6 E
    post #116970
    68 90 3 E

    Wow, back with a winner. Her chest is a tad too human for me, maybe, but there's no such thing as reptile breasts, so can't really fault the AI.

    Otherwise quite believable without going creepy, imo.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #116350
    114 121 11 E

    caserus said:
    Work in chiropractic office hearing pops, snaps, and all sorts of gross sounds all day... can't handle fireworks.

    She actually works in the school as a nurse. She's always shown as having no idea what to do, so I think the joke is that chiropractors have little to no real medical training, and she's not even that, she's only an assistant to one.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #116705
    43 20 4 S

    Well done. You have been granted one (1) opossum kiss.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #116949
    222 389 2 E
    post #116012
    168 274 2 E
    post #116957
    192 324 1 E
    post #116956
    94 92 4 S
    31 40 3 Q
    post #117021
    230 331 4 Q