Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #115761
    146 198 2 E
    post #116161
    269 479 3 E
    post #27449
    30 64 7 Q
    post #21102
    41 64 3 E
    post #44187
    74 111 1 E
    post #52688
    103 155 1 E
    post #44186
    81 130 1 E
    post #61030
    62 101 1 E
    post #55660
    60 96 3 E
    post #108387
    322 549 4 E
    post #66565
    138 253 2 E
    post #114126
    144 238 2 Q
    post #60765
    252 428 2 E
    post #99830
    79 115 5 Q
    post #68948
    94 139 1 E
    post #72418
    200 319 1 E
    post #63893
    81 123 2 E
    post #107513
    92 142 1 Q
    post #49371
    49 75 1 E
    post #57333
    145 203 3 E
    82 133 1 Q
    post #112943
    169 254 2 E
    post #116148
    121 153 4 Q
    post #112918
    113 184 2 E
    post #65683
    37 59 1 E
    post #116061
    293 441 12 E

    googous

    Member

    yliaster said:

    ahahaha no, let's not conflate things that aren't really related. If you have at least one eye and enough GPU horsepower to kill god then you can use genAI. Beyond that you just dump it into an image editor, liquefy/smudge out dumb stuff, and pull the lever. Pull the lever. Pull the lever. Until you get what you want.

    Well, you're definitely producing some quality art regardless of the method so thank you for that.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #76356
    57 98 2 E
    post #80565
    48 53 1 Q
    post #116035
    231 362 1 E
    post #60531
    69 94 1 Q
    post #45201
    76 124 1 S
    post #44249
    119 210 1 E
    post #8092
    80 131 1 E
    post #116137
    84 105 2 Q
    post #47433
    41 48 1 E
    post #107039
    141 253 1 E
    post #113337
    107 196 1 E
    post #116196
    21 39 1 E
    post #115593
    177 334 5 E
    post #116177
    300 565 4 E
    post #116124
    215 313 2 Q

    Reoadi

    Member

    She's absolutely beautiful! Could you please share the prompt and settings you used? I'd love to try and create something similar.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #114976
    233 375 3 E

    Puffydonut

    Member

    gobai said:
    yeah sadly, i'm also not really happy with the speed.
    But for a first experiment it came out good.

    Amp playback speed

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #116106
    61 92 1 E
    post #116015
    182 239 6 E
    post #116181
    549 942 4 E
    post #115970
    148 234 2 E
    post #116061
    293 441 12 E
    post #116070
    279 354 12 Q
    post #116124
    215 313 2 Q
    84 109 4 E
    84 109 4 E
    post #116160
    283 481 2 E
    post #86892
    121 199 1 E
    post #116022
    170 329 1 E
    post #116070
    279 354 12 Q
    post #115885
    68 93 6 E

    Nocheamante

    Member

    kingk said:
    I think this one's a lot better than the other horse, personally. That one looked purely human apart from the head, feet and tail.

    Yup, her coloration was nicer, more equine contrast, but it was that lack of fur that diminished the picture.
    I still wish the model was more more feral waist down. Equines don't need any improvement in that department.

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #114172
    56 48 2 Q
    post #86559
    102 169 1 E
    post #116061
    293 441 12 E

    yliaster

    Member

    neta said:
    Any more information about the director?

    it me

    fluffscaler said:
    You should upload the cross section version of this too, that one was peak

    I would/will but I realized there's an oopsie fuckie with the anatomy that I gotta fix first

    ilmpbx said:
    This is the sort of thing that can happen when a high cal artist gets their hands on an AI toolset.

    ahahaha no, let's not conflate things that aren't really related. If you have at least one eye and enough GPU horsepower to kill god then you can use genAI. Beyond that you just dump it into an image editor, liquefy/smudge out dumb stuff, and pull the lever. Pull the lever. Pull the lever. Until you get what you want.

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #27449
    30 64 7 Q
    post #115734
    160 277 2 E
    post #115965
    106 138 1 Q

    AdarJoor

    Member

    He knows he's got legs. Those stockings really show off how shapely they are, lol.

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #115937
    132 204 6 Q

    AdarJoor

    Member

    plapenjoyer said:
    Oops! If I had any reading comprehension my original comment would have said "he is not a grower" :c

    I've got a pretty big image set lined up! Refining them into an acceptable quality just takes a little time :D

    Lol, it's fine, I got what you meant. ^_^ Based on the recent images, he's not allowed to be a grower XD

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #116117
    67 118 1 E
    post #116161
    269 479 3 E
    55 69 1 E
    84 109 4 E
    post #116160
    283 481 2 E
    post #114691
    44 44 4 S
    post #116007
    132 205 4 E
    post #116154
    235 364 1 E
    post #116032
    59 78 5 E
    post #116146
    73 93 1 Q
    post #116015
    182 239 6 E
    post #116148
    121 153 4 Q