Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #44186
    81 131 1 E
    post #61030
    61 100 1 E
    post #55660
    59 97 3 E
    post #108387
    307 535 4 E
    post #66565
    133 245 2 E
    post #114126
    132 223 2 Q
    post #60765
    248 424 2 E
    post #99830
    79 115 5 Q
    post #68948
    93 141 1 E
    post #72418
    193 317 1 E
    post #63893
    81 123 2 E
    post #107513
    89 140 1 Q
    post #49371
    47 73 1 E
    post #57333
    144 203 3 E
    82 136 1 Q
    post #112943
    168 254 2 E
    post #116148
    118 146 4 Q
    post #112918
    112 188 2 E
    post #65683
    36 57 1 E
    post #116061
    284 431 12 E

    googous

    Member

    yliaster said:

    ahahaha no, let's not conflate things that aren't really related. If you have at least one eye and enough GPU horsepower to kill god then you can use genAI. Beyond that you just dump it into an image editor, liquefy/smudge out dumb stuff, and pull the lever. Pull the lever. Pull the lever. Until you get what you want.

    Well, you're definitely producing some quality art regardless of the method so thank you for that.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #76356
    57 99 2 E
    post #80565
    46 52 1 Q
    post #116035
    218 354 1 E
    post #60531
    67 91 1 Q
    post #45201
    74 122 1 S
    post #44249
    116 208 1 E
    post #8092
    80 134 1 E
    post #116137
    81 101 2 Q
    post #47433
    40 47 1 E
    post #107039
    138 253 1 E
    post #113337
    107 198 1 E
    post #116196
    19 33 1 E
    post #115593
    171 328 5 E
    post #116177
    282 534 4 E
    post #116124
    211 307 2 Q

    Reoadi

    Member

    She's absolutely beautiful! Could you please share the prompt and settings you used? I'd love to try and create something similar.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #114976
    230 369 3 E

    Puffydonut

    Member

    gobai said:
    yeah sadly, i'm also not really happy with the speed.
    But for a first experiment it came out good.

    Amp playback speed

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #116106
    58 92 1 E
    post #116015
    175 233 6 E
    post #116181
    526 910 4 E
    post #115970
    136 222 2 E
    post #116061
    284 431 12 E
    post #116070
    269 341 12 Q
    post #116124
    211 307 2 Q
    84 110 4 E
    84 110 4 E
    post #116160
    276 471 2 E
    post #86892
    120 197 1 E
    post #116022
    159 309 1 E
    post #116070
    269 341 12 Q
    post #115885
    66 91 6 E

    Nocheamante

    Member

    kingk said:
    I think this one's a lot better than the other horse, personally. That one looked purely human apart from the head, feet and tail.

    Yup, her coloration was nicer, more equine contrast, but it was that lack of fur that diminished the picture.
    I still wish the model was more more feral waist down. Equines don't need any improvement in that department.

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #114172
    55 47 2 Q
    post #86559
    100 167 1 E
    post #116061
    284 431 12 E

    yliaster

    Member

    neta said:
    Any more information about the director?

    it me

    fluffscaler said:
    You should upload the cross section version of this too, that one was peak

    I would/will but I realized there's an oopsie fuckie with the anatomy that I gotta fix first

    ilmpbx said:
    This is the sort of thing that can happen when a high cal artist gets their hands on an AI toolset.

    ahahaha no, let's not conflate things that aren't really related. If you have at least one eye and enough GPU horsepower to kill god then you can use genAI. Beyond that you just dump it into an image editor, liquefy/smudge out dumb stuff, and pull the lever. Pull the lever. Pull the lever. Until you get what you want.

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #27449
    29 62 7 Q
    post #115734
    155 273 2 E
    post #115965
    97 130 1 Q

    AdarJoor

    Member

    He knows he's got legs. Those stockings really show off how shapely they are, lol.

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #115937
    120 189 6 Q

    AdarJoor

    Member

    plapenjoyer said:
    Oops! If I had any reading comprehension my original comment would have said "he is not a grower" :c

    I've got a pretty big image set lined up! Refining them into an acceptable quality just takes a little time :D

    Lol, it's fine, I got what you meant. ^_^ Based on the recent images, he's not allowed to be a grower XD

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #116117
    64 115 1 E
    post #116161
    257 453 3 E
    54 70 1 E
    84 110 4 E
    post #116160
    276 471 2 E
    post #114691
    44 44 4 S
    post #116007
    126 194 4 E
    post #116154
    215 333 1 E
    post #116032
    55 72 5 E
    post #116146
    72 92 1 Q
    post #116015
    175 233 6 E
    post #116148
    118 146 4 Q
    79 122 1 E
    post #110974
    195 326 5 E

    medicineball

    Member

    velric_olrand said:
    In my humble opinion, this should be e6ai’s mascot.

    I upvoted this and after only one other upvoted it I got to say that this comment did not get enough love.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #113776
    212 356 2 E

    medicineball

    Member

    "collaborative_sex".... Might just be the best tag on the site...

    These two seriously give me the feels.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    84 110 4 E

    medicineball

    Member

    More her please!

    Love the border collie girls of this quality...

    Sequences like this also magnify the sexy.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #115301
    248 473 3 E

    c12473

    Member

    fuzzypawz said:
    Stuff like this make me question my sexuality. I mean, who wouldnt want that kind of treatment from nick? Especially looking like that 😍

    before nick, sigmax's bambi had me questioning mine

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #102774
    134 222 3 E

    c12473

    Member

    notjohnllama said:
    If he really were the "Goat" he would put Pilgor as his true sex, female, because Pilgor is female

    What? Pilgor from Goatsim and the real goat theyre based on and the one in Fortnite are all male.

  • |
  • -1
    •