Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #112018
    297 524 2 E
    post #112123
    110 180 5 E
    post #112127
    81 147 2 E
    post #112012
    60 58 3 S
    post #112120
    156 279 2 E
    post #112069
    229 388 2 E
    post #106269
    59 73 4 S
    post #111955
    174 331 2 E
    post #111303
    230 384 4 E
    post #111957
    75 103 3 E

    Seems like something she would do, all whats missing is retsuko in the background with a shocked expression. xD

  • |
  • 2
  • post #111955
    174 331 2 E
    post #112100
    131 233 2 E
    post #111976
    51 85 1 E
    post #111978
    65 109 1 E
    post #111980
    334 563 1 E
    post #111982
    243 376 8 E
    post #111986
    283 504 3 E
    post #111438
    180 258 6 E
    post #111914
    319 569 2 E

    Vaporeon is often highlighted as the most compatible Pokémon with humans due to its unique anatomy and abilities. The design of Vaporeon's body features elements that some interpret as being adaptable to human interactions.

    ...* nosebleed *

  • |
  • 1
  • post #112123
    110 180 5 E
    post #111994
    122 195 2 E
    post #112122
    171 313 2 E
    post #112123
    110 180 5 E
    post #112094
    135 219 1 E
    post #112123
    110 180 5 E
    post #112105
    146 265 1 E
    post #112115
    64 85 1 E
    post #112116
    67 97 1 E
    post #112124
    273 465 2 E
    post #112069
    229 388 2 E
    post #112114
    66 103 2 E
    post #111995
    85 113 4 E

    bluescreenedwolf said:
    You’re telling me this is your first?! Blowing my mind with how photorealistic it is with no mistakes! Can’t wait to see how you go from here~

    Thanks! I do have a few other ones I'm working on, although I may not be super active.
    Was mostly curious about the process and what is doable.
    So far I've found it rather limited, as most of my attempts to make more interesting and/or expressive scenes has reduced the overall quality drastically.
    I may make something new from time to time if I get inspired, otherwise I'm mostly planning on finishing what I have.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #111847
    104 105 3 S
    post #112068
    136 258 1 E
    post #111891
    116 194 1 E
    post #111702
    65 75 3 S

    bearhugger said:
    "Bro, this is not what I meant when I said you could touch them"

    "Sorry girl, your ears are tempting, but that adorable face you're making is worth it"

  • |
  • 2
  • 4 0 6 Q

    stablexai said:
    Still you are right, some people do indeed downvote just for not liking things. I do have some fetishes which get targeted like this. And a reminder is a good thing.
    But keep in mind it's not always about that. Also don't take downvotes too seriously or personal. Would be better. Some people always downvote even perfectly fine images with no fetishes.

    I don't take it personally but like, I cannot find the logic in people actively looking for stuff they don't like with the sole purpose of downvoting.
    Anyway, I (hopefully) fixed it up in post #112104 , and gave you a little shoutout for spotting it and correcting me (if that's okay)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #112102
    57 86 2 E

    Nice! Love female mewtwo stuff, and showing of their skills.
    I do have a few like this too - actually quite a lot, I just struggle with free time fixing them up.
    <3

  • |
  • 1
  • 4 0 6 Q

    sergalbutt said:
    Y'know, I did take a peek at the official ref, and I stand corrected.
    I did mess it up.

    Still you are right, some people do indeed downvote just for not liking things. I do have some fetishes which get targeted like this. And a reminder is a good thing.
    But keep in mind it's not always about that. Also don't take downvotes too seriously or personal. Would be better. Some people always downvote even perfectly fine images with no fetishes.

  • |
  • 1
  • 4 0 6 Q

    stablexai said:
    No hard feelings but google "Sergal" please. During my non-AI artist time I did draw several sergal images including some refs.
    And sure some of them "look like" having an extra joint but it goes the other way around downwards.

    Y'know, I did take a peek at the official ref, and I stand corrected.
    I did mess it up.

  • |
  • 1
  • 4 0 6 Q

    sergalbutt said:
    Sergal feet are like that! It's not two heels, per se, but there is another joint there.

    I do appreciate the criticism though, honestly.

    No hard feelings but google "Sergal" please. During my non-AI artist time I did draw several sergal images including some refs.
    And sure some of them "look like" having an extra joint but it goes the other way around downwards.

  • |
  • 0
  • 4 0 6 Q

    stablexai said:
    ... in this image the feetpaws have two heels; One on the ground and one against the couch.

    Sergal feet are like that! It's not two heels, per se, but there is another joint there.

    I do appreciate the criticism though, honestly.

  • |
  • -1
  • post #111887
    136 201 4 E
    4 0 6 Q

    I do like paws and have a paw fetish.
    I for example usually downvote an image when there are anatomical errors, or AI based things which would have been easy to fix but kept in the image, which will be trained into future models.
    Or when it feels like the person is out for quantity over quality, or when their logo is half the size of the image. (I'm just talking general here, not about you.)
    It's hard to blacklist those things.

    I mean you do good things, but for example in this image the feetpaws have two heels; One on the ground and one against the couch.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #111957
    75 103 3 E
    post #112097
    134 194 4 E
    post #111991
    128 158 4 E

    zabern said:
    Funny thing is that I was trying to make the last few as realistic as possible. It is quite hard to make the model understand that I want a animated character to look like they are real, without them just truing in to a regular woman. I have lots of failed versions of these animations that are just furry bodies with real faces on them.

    Yeah I've run into similar even with pictures. Realistic furry is still tough to achieve. Sometimes they look more like a weird photo of those anime cat girls with just a snout and ears on a woman's face.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #112007
    73 139 1 E
    post #104116
    221 341 2 E
    post #111990
    83 156 2 E
    post #111991
    128 158 4 E

    kingk said:
    I may be in the minority, but I personally think this semi-realistic style is better than the last few cartoony animations.

    Funny thing is that I was trying to make the last few as realistic as possible. It is quite hard to make the model understand that I want a animated character to look like they are real, without them just truing in to a regular woman. I have lots of failed versions of these animations that are just furry bodies with real faces on them.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #111987
    17 74 3 E
    post #111982
    243 376 8 E
    post #111702
    65 75 3 S
    post #111886
    492 824 4 E

    The lioness looks gorgeous in ideal fun size. Good work on her expressions too :) I imagine people can see quite exotic pairings so there is something to admire for everyone.
    I wonder who lives below the cum drain. Hmm...

  • |
  • 2
  • post #111565
    106 153 2 Q
    post #112028
    207 410 3 E
    post #84128
    71 102 3 E

    paj said:
    Who is the source? and do they have a fitting male counterpart?

    I created only female variant.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #111995
    85 113 4 E

    You’re telling me this is your first?! Blowing my mind with how photorealistic it is with no mistakes! Can’t wait to see how you go from here~

  • |
  • 1
  • post #112028
    207 410 3 E
    post #112012
    60 58 3 S
    post #112025
    48 49 3 S

    the lil bro we all wanna spend all night watching old youtube videos with 💖

  • |
  • 3
  • post #112027
    213 420 3 E
    post #111982
    243 376 8 E

    I do that too while at work when it's freezing out, standing under a plane while it's idling blasting out warm air. 👍

  • |
  • 5
  • post #111991
    128 158 4 E

    I may be in the minority, but I personally think this semi-realistic style is better than the last few cartoony animations.

  • |
  • 8
  • post #111967
    191 320 3 E
    post #110869
    104 145 2 E

    The picture is gorgeous, but the right ear spoils everything...When you turn your head like that, it's in the wrong place...(too far from the right side)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #109925
    190 320 4 E

    The fox's face looks contradictory. The head seems to be looking straight (judging by the nose, which shows only one nostril), but for some reason the left eye is visible, although the head is not turned.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #111759
    67 68 3 S
    post #111987
    17 74 3 E

    That's way to much and over the top for my taste. And it's the wrong genital form for a feline. This looks just unhealthy :D but hey...everyone his own beer.

  • |
  • -2
  • post #111852
    136 228 2 E
    post #111829
    71 60 8 E
    post #111549
    190 351 1 E
    post #111950
    25 25 2 S
    post #111941
    56 90 1 E