Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #90823
    429 779 5 E
    post #67583
    207 319 4 E

    footlover95 said:
    how do you make this so realistc, its insane

    Thanks! I achieve this with a ton of different models- all good at different things, applied to different parts of the image, then a bunch of photomanip and color adjustments ;P

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90519
    234 401 6 E

    coughfuk said:
    Um...2 questions....
    Where are those sexy teats of hers?
    Where did those beautiful pink love buds go?
    Not that I'm complaining mind you.

    We haven't decided on her final look yet :)

    It would be more canonical to leave her without nipples - she is a Pokemon, not a dog, afterall. On the other hand... Within the AU, this is, as it were, quite possible.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #90760
    71 120 2 E
    post #90787
    284 462 1 E
    post #90707
    50 90 2 E
    post #90196
    232 410 2 E
    post #90754
    279 460 20 E

    shanti said:
    And what am I wrong about saying re: That eye removal is intentional and it's dumb?

    1. Comments like that are not helpful. It would be like me going on to something you created and saying "wow I think this looks dumb". Not constructive.
    2. You seem to be kind of annoying, because you really like to repeat yourself.

  • |
  • 6
  • post #90593
    31 34 1 S
    post #90680
    292 461 5 Q
    post #90750
    402 730 1 E
    post #90487
    478 835 1 E
    post #90515
    173 259 7 E

    shanti said:
    I find it more enjoyable to look at a full-figured person and imagine myself in their shoes when they have all their body parts in place.

    A preference issue isn't grounds for flagging 😐

  • |
  • 7
  • 45 68 5 E

    lemlem said:
    to no criticism of the piece itself i enjoyed the clothed version more with the clothing raggedy half on, i think it created a more fulfilled imaginary scene befit for the where the individuals are, that being a horny bar in this case

    I agree, but I was asked to do nudity

  • |
  • -1
  • post #61943
    165 290 4 E
    45 68 5 E

    to no criticism of the piece itself i enjoyed the clothed version more with the clothing raggedy half on, i think it created a more fulfilled imaginary scene befit for the where the individuals are, that being a horny bar in this case

  • |
  • 1
  • post #87097
    169 252 4 E

    She's super cute and sexy. She put her little fluffy tail on backwards, though. ;)

  • |
  • 0
  • 20 2 6 E

    technical-grid said:
    There wasn't. It's the pictogram of the mouse character being freaky in the restroom from the parent post - just in full res.
    Sometimes mods will nuke something for exaggerated reason and there's nothing you can really do about it

    I find it especially ironic that the image was already posted to the site within the parent post which is still up today.
    That's ignoring the whole high-schooler being marked as cub thing.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90697
    194 321 1 E
    post #90204
    372 736 3 E
    post #90761
    103 188 6 E
    post #90765
    180 271 2 Q
    132 300 2 E

    zheneric said:
    Is this a reupload?

    Whoops, forgot I had already uploaded a different version.
    It's sorted out now!

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90813
    96 135 3 Q
    132 300 2 E
    post #90831
    478 879 4 E
    118 187 12 E

    mikubraver said:
    When your a background character in a anime. xD

    Name me an anime where the secondary characters don't have eyes.

  • |
  • -9
  • post #90515
    173 259 7 E

    majinbreed said:
    I mean, you are welcome to just flat out call something 'stupid' but it doesn't affect the truth that a faceless male can be stylised without eyes as a means of the viewers self insertion into the image.
    It has been done plenty of times on both the AI Site and Main E6 site drawn by artists for that very reason.

    Want to make something with extra fingers, go for it, no one is stopping you. As long as it is actually part of the character, and not a temper tantrum over the rules, you are free to do what you want.

    Just remember that doing something just to be petty probably wont reflect well.

    Remember, personal growth also comes by sometime taking the L and moving on with the day
    e6 wiki page for anon, for your reading pleasure https://e621.net/wiki_pages/8336

    I find it more enjoyable to look at a full-figured person and imagine myself in their shoes when they have all their body parts in place.

  • |
  • -7
  • post #86512
    105 165 2 E
    post #90788
    69 100 1 S

    I need glasses that make my eyes glow like that. Cool Cookie moment.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90780
    276 426 6 E
    post #90760
    71 120 2 E
    post #90690
    149 239 2 E
    post #33011
    41 60 1 E
    post #90780
    276 426 6 E
    post #90381
    471 813 4 E
    post #90823
    429 779 5 E
    48 51 2 E

    badwolf1 said:
    So, what's the issue. I don't see anything messed up.

    Only thing I really saw are the hands are a bit disjointed, especially when you look at them at full res. Maybe the spear head, but the whole aesthetic of these tends to be raggedy, so I don’t mind it. I rather like this style

  • |
  • 2
  • post #90823
    429 779 5 E
    post #89186
    138 237 2 E
    post #90807
    54 91 1 E
    post #90761
    103 188 6 E
    154 258 1 E
    post #90519
    234 401 6 E

    Um...2 questions....
    Where are those sexy teats of hers?
    Where did those beautiful pink love buds go?
    Not that I'm complaining mind you.

  • |
  • 0
  • 45 68 5 E
    post #90761
    103 188 6 E
    post #90513
    142 236 1 E
    post #75206
    75 116 2 E
    post #90765
    180 271 2 Q

    I like this but it's SO very dark. Had to add some brightness, contrast, gamma, and a bit of saturation just to see her in her glory.

    Edit: Really guys? It's a lovely image. But it's a DARK, visually washed out image. Can't help that you disagree.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90813
    96 135 3 Q
    post #90780
    276 426 6 E
    post #90638
    219 360 3 E
    45 68 5 E

    phantom_tire_buyer said:
    Hell yeah! Thank you!

    I know you mentioned getting their bodies to play nice for the gen was a PITA but maybe some time her mouth can get a little closer to his uh... Zeenis. XD

  • |
  • 2
  • 45 68 5 E
    post #60689
    95 229 3 E
    post #60680
    105 219 1 E
    post #90785
    115 200 2 E

    phantom_tire_buyer said:
    Can you do a version where they are both totally nude? It's already got a bit of a fun Furronika vibe!

    I'll do it for you. I also like Furronica and Doctordj. Both draw without paints. I don't know about the vibe of Furronica and me, but his bear is good

  • |
  • 3
  • post #90635
    167 260 3 E
    post #90770
    103 173 1 E
    post #90761
    103 188 6 E
    5 7 1 S
    post #90754
    279 460 20 E

    Even though I still have my eyes and aren't build as good as this dude, I still wanna swap places with him.
    I could smex Glaceon 24/7.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90771
    45 62 1 E
    26 25 1 E
    post #90791
    193 297 4 E
    post #90783
    234 409 2 E
    118 187 12 E

    shanti said:
    More versatile? It seems to me that they are: Intentional generation errors.
    So because of some small error (an extra finger or lack thereof) we delete an image, but an image where the eyes are SPECIALLY removed, no!

    I intentionally removed the eyes through prompts "faceless man". I wanted it to be universal.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #90780
    276 426 6 E
    post #90791
    193 297 4 E
    post #90781
    254 430 2 E
    post #90686
    368 671 3 E
    post #90546
    14 10 1 S
    23 32 2 E
    post #90687
    247 441 2 E
    post #90791
    193 297 4 E