Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #90593
    31 34 1 S
    post #90680
    292 461 5 Q
    post #90750
    403 729 1 E
    post #90487
    481 837 1 E
    post #90515
    173 259 7 E

    shanti said:
    I find it more enjoyable to look at a full-figured person and imagine myself in their shoes when they have all their body parts in place.

    A preference issue isn't grounds for flagging 😐

  • |
  • 7
  • 45 68 5 E

    lemlem said:
    to no criticism of the piece itself i enjoyed the clothed version more with the clothing raggedy half on, i think it created a more fulfilled imaginary scene befit for the where the individuals are, that being a horny bar in this case

    I agree, but I was asked to do nudity

  • |
  • -1
  • post #61943
    165 288 4 E
    45 68 5 E

    to no criticism of the piece itself i enjoyed the clothed version more with the clothing raggedy half on, i think it created a more fulfilled imaginary scene befit for the where the individuals are, that being a horny bar in this case

  • |
  • 1
  • post #87097
    169 252 4 E

    She's super cute and sexy. She put her little fluffy tail on backwards, though. ;)

  • |
  • 0
  • 20 2 6 E

    technical-grid said:
    There wasn't. It's the pictogram of the mouse character being freaky in the restroom from the parent post - just in full res.
    Sometimes mods will nuke something for exaggerated reason and there's nothing you can really do about it

    I find it especially ironic that the image was already posted to the site within the parent post which is still up today.
    That's ignoring the whole high-schooler being marked as cub thing.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90697
    194 320 1 E
    post #90204
    372 739 3 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E
    post #90765
    180 270 2 Q
    132 299 2 E

    zheneric said:
    Is this a reupload?

    Whoops, forgot I had already uploaded a different version.
    It's sorted out now!

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90813
    96 133 3 Q
    132 299 2 E
    post #90831
    484 878 4 E
    118 187 12 E

    mikubraver said:
    When your a background character in a anime. xD

    Name me an anime where the secondary characters don't have eyes.

  • |
  • -9
  • post #90515
    173 259 7 E

    majinbreed said:
    I mean, you are welcome to just flat out call something 'stupid' but it doesn't affect the truth that a faceless male can be stylised without eyes as a means of the viewers self insertion into the image.
    It has been done plenty of times on both the AI Site and Main E6 site drawn by artists for that very reason.

    Want to make something with extra fingers, go for it, no one is stopping you. As long as it is actually part of the character, and not a temper tantrum over the rules, you are free to do what you want.

    Just remember that doing something just to be petty probably wont reflect well.

    Remember, personal growth also comes by sometime taking the L and moving on with the day
    e6 wiki page for anon, for your reading pleasure https://e621.net/wiki_pages/8336

    I find it more enjoyable to look at a full-figured person and imagine myself in their shoes when they have all their body parts in place.

  • |
  • -7
  • post #86512
    105 164 2 E
    post #90788
    69 100 1 S

    I need glasses that make my eyes glow like that. Cool Cookie moment.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90780
    277 427 6 E
    post #90760
    71 120 2 E
    post #90690
    149 237 2 E
    post #33011
    40 60 1 E
    post #90780
    277 427 6 E
    post #90381
    472 812 4 E
    post #90823
    431 777 5 E
    48 51 2 E

    badwolf1 said:
    So, what's the issue. I don't see anything messed up.

    Only thing I really saw are the hands are a bit disjointed, especially when you look at them at full res. Maybe the spear head, but the whole aesthetic of these tends to be raggedy, so I don’t mind it. I rather like this style

  • |
  • 2
  • post #90823
    431 777 5 E
    post #89186
    138 236 2 E
    post #90807
    54 89 1 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E
    154 256 1 E
    post #90519
    236 402 6 E

    Um...2 questions....
    Where are those sexy teats of hers?
    Where did those beautiful pink love buds go?
    Not that I'm complaining mind you.

  • |
  • 0
  • 45 68 5 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E
    post #90513
    142 236 1 E
    post #75206
    76 116 2 E
    post #90765
    180 270 2 Q

    I like this but it's SO very dark. Had to add some brightness, contrast, gamma, and a bit of saturation just to see her in her glory.

    Edit: Really guys? It's a lovely image. But it's a DARK, visually washed out image. Can't help that you disagree.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90813
    96 133 3 Q
    post #90780
    277 427 6 E
    post #90638
    219 360 3 E
    45 68 5 E

    phantom_tire_buyer said:
    Hell yeah! Thank you!

    I know you mentioned getting their bodies to play nice for the gen was a PITA but maybe some time her mouth can get a little closer to his uh... Zeenis. XD

  • |
  • 2
  • 45 68 5 E
    post #60689
    95 229 3 E
    post #60680
    105 217 1 E
    post #90785
    115 200 2 E

    phantom_tire_buyer said:
    Can you do a version where they are both totally nude? It's already got a bit of a fun Furronika vibe!

    I'll do it for you. I also like Furronica and Doctordj. Both draw without paints. I don't know about the vibe of Furronica and me, but his bear is good

  • |
  • 3
  • post #90635
    167 259 3 E
    post #90770
    104 174 1 E
    post #90761
    103 185 6 E
    5 7 1 S
    post #90754
    281 460 20 E

    Even though I still have my eyes and aren't build as good as this dude, I still wanna swap places with him.
    I could smex Glaceon 24/7.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90771
    46 62 1 E
    26 25 1 E
    post #90791
    193 294 4 E
    post #90783
    234 406 2 E
    118 187 12 E

    shanti said:
    More versatile? It seems to me that they are: Intentional generation errors.
    So because of some small error (an extra finger or lack thereof) we delete an image, but an image where the eyes are SPECIALLY removed, no!

    I intentionally removed the eyes through prompts "faceless man". I wanted it to be universal.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #90780
    277 427 6 E
    post #90791
    193 294 4 E
    post #90781
    254 428 2 E
    post #90686
    369 671 3 E
    post #90546
    14 10 1 S
    23 32 2 E
    post #90687
    248 439 2 E
    post #90791
    193 294 4 E
    post #90792
    207 347 1 E
    post #90743
    144 233 1 E
    32 50 1 E
    post #90724
    238 405 10 E

    This is by far the best representation of anatomically correct cow rear (udder included) I have ever seen on an anthro. Superb. Will be following your future work.

  • |
  • 5
  • post #90785
    115 200 2 E

    Can you do a version where they are both totally nude? It's already got a bit of a fun Furronika vibe!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #90777
    216 305 3 E
    post #90737
    113 194 1 E
    post #90783
    234 406 2 E