Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #79619
    240 444 2 E
    post #79343
    104 155 3 E
    post #79769
    104 137 1 E
    post #79767
    74 92 2 E
    post #79768
    62 75 2 E
    post #79776
    54 80 2 E
    post #79780
    81 127 3 E
    post #79781
    53 57 1 S
    post #79801
    192 360 2 E
    post #79800
    69 112 1 E
    post #79801
    192 360 2 E
    post #79804
    108 168 2 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    Y'know, I didn't really even LIKE hyenas until you came along, and now my entire worldview has been flip-flopped🙃

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #79810
    50 73 1 E
    post #79805
    67 98 2 Q
    post #79780
    81 127 3 E
    3 2 1 S
    post #56320
    161 227 4 E
    post #79740
    264 450 2 E
    post #79755
    88 123 6 E
    post #79775
    129 204 1 E

    Duros

    Member

    “And what happened, then? Well, in Whoville they say – that the Grinch's small dick grew three sizes that day!”

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #79725
    141 258 2 E
    post #79767
    74 92 2 E
    post #79764
    29 54 2 E
    post #79766
    87 114 2 E
    post #79417
    129 209 3 E
    post #79760
    157 245 4 E

    Beerwolf

    Privileged

    Not distracted enough to notice the beam behind her missing half way down 😅

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #79404
    72 106 6 Q

    Jelloponies

    Admin

    feckin_ded_m8 said:
    dude, SmittyG actually has to work to make art, it takes a shitload of time and effort to make real artwork, ESPECIALLY colored and shaded artwork. The reason Foxlover can make so much is because it's AI, no work other than prompting. I love Foxlover too, but SmittyG actually works harder to make one of those black and white sketches than Foxlover does on ~10 of these.

    Have some respect for the work real artists put into their art.

    Actual drawing does take a lot of work indeed.
    I will say though that if you want to get quality out of your AI generated images then there is a lot more to the process than just prompting. For the best results you need to use manual image editing, inpainting and at times even drawing.
    While I understand the point you're making I'd just like to say that I don't think it's fair to fully dismiss quality AI images as taking zero work.
    I'm not trying to say that traditional art and AI generation are equal in effort or skill needed but they do take different kinds of skills and both take a lot of time, skill and effort if you want to make something that's actually good.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #79741
    19 13 1 S

    Nahatomb

    Member

    I don't know if it's the animation or the art style but it reminds me of "Dragons Crown"

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #79757
    141 240 2 E

    user 28858

    Member

    Perhaps my favorite one! Love the way he's bending forward and sticking that bubble butt back for our viewing pleasure~

    Updated

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #79677
    28 49 1 E

    user 22651

    Member

    i like this style. i didn't think i would feel nostalgia for 512x512 images so soon. i guess that this could be using an SD1.5 era model? good times. i wish that FLUX was useful for the furry genre of gens, but its conceptual breadth is so pitifully narrow even with LoRAs. i wonder what the next generation of AuraFlow models will bring us...?

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #79754
    178 289 3 E

    blp

    Member

    potato_salad said:
    Such a beautiful butthole~ In love with your feral felines!

    thanks! glad you like them. i uploaded a few more, just for you!

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #79754
    178 289 3 E
    post #55703
    105 150 2 E
    post #68440
    36 44 4 E
    post #74700
    35 53 5 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    jons said:
    Yeah. I think it's better not to be in a situation like that again.

    Who would've thought. The only punishment I faced for my crime was getting banned from a furry porn website.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #76278
    90 147 6 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    kingfurryai said:
    That is exactly how I imagined her! :D

    The question is: what animal Rei should be?

    Hmmm... Maybe a mouse? Quiet. Small presence. And on Asuka's shit-list

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #73966
    141 206 5 E
    post #76955
    190 319 4 E
    post #70771
    184 323 5 E

    HorseFucker5

    Member

    beerwolf said:
    Curiously odd, I find male anthros appealing but I'm straight as an arrow in real life with literally zero attraction to men.

    Yeah, it was the same for me for like 10 whole years. I only found male Anthros to be hot, but not humans. Then WHAM. It just kinda hit me one day. Sexuality is weird.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #79193
    355 584 13 E
    post #79328
    94 137 2 E
    post #79646
    152 238 5 Q
    post #79640
    38 68 2 E
    post #79671
    91 145 4 E
    post #79690
    150 232 2 E
    post #79569
    116 212 2 E
    post #79641
    117 184 1 E
    post #79562
    148 234 4 E
    post #79688
    31 44 3 E
    post #79646
    152 238 5 Q

    ilmpbx

    Member

    seli said:
    I think I need to write a text about my workflow, a lot of people started asking. Spoiler alert: it's nothing special

    Special or no, you're generating some great content. Please let me know if you write something up!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #79646
    152 238 5 Q

    seli

    Member

    ilmpbx said:
    FR, the reflection is top notch. The resolution is also impressive. Would love to learn a little about Seli's process.

    I think I need to write a text about my workflow, a lot of people started asking. Spoiler alert: it's nothing special

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #79491
    3 3 1 E
    post #79234
    6 9 1 E
    post #75982
    108 183 2 E

    QuotationMark

    Member

    badwolf1 said:
    Looked at this a few times, something was off but I couldn't figure it out.
    I just realized her tits are between her front legs.
    Never seen that before, kinda funny,

    Literal breasts, hah.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #79647
    5 8 1 E
    3 3 1 E
    post #79476
    3 5 1 E
    post #79676
    66 91 3 S
    post #68755
    194 312 2 E
    post #79717
    26 41 1 Q
    post #79079
    75 96 1 Q
    post #79721
    252 434 1 E
    post #78124
    35 29 5 S

    Bahufaru

    Member

    beerwolf said:
    That's some 30 year old txt-2-speech quality.

    Not sure if that is supposed to be a critique or what, but it is about as modern a text to speech as I can get online. If you know a better provider, point me to them.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #79646
    152 238 5 Q

    ilmpbx

    Member

    denatural said:
    OPTIONS:
    Water detail: Ultra
    Reflections: Ultra

    FR, the reflection is top notch. The resolution is also impressive. Would love to learn a little about Seli's process.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #65235
    122 185 1 E

    ilmpbx

    Member

    I really like this one! The art style and proportions make this pop.

    Updated

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #79434
    120 217 4 E
    post #72572
    298 545 2 E
    post #79676
    66 91 3 S

    Genophalin

    Member

    This is the best version of Renamon! She was perfect from the start, it’s frustrating how little artwork there is of her with this more canon accurate body. I really hope you plan to generate more with this model!

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #73884
    65 106 2 Q
    post #79458
    107 181 3 E

    YDNTK

    Member

    medicineball said:
    Nice first. Really appreciate the Raine (not enough of her on any site).

    Keep 'em coming!

    I will. just takes me a while to refine a pose/theme enough to make something of this quality.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #79676
    66 91 3 S

    Nocheamante

    Member

    Imagine THAT being your digimon you're perpetually paired with. There would definitely be at least one experiment session at the very minimum just to see whee things go from there.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    68 101 3 E

    Nocheamante

    Member

    silvicultor said:
    Haha, proof-of-concept that I can gen female deer without antlers! But don't worry, I will gen does with antlers again!😉
    Because some people might say that I only gen with antlers because it's easier.
    (All models I use are biased to put antlers on any cervid character)

    Antler-less female deer are more common anyway. They don't need them.

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #79434
    120 217 4 E

    Sigmaomega321

    Member

    Pleeeeaaaase make more of her! She’s so cute! Would love it if we saw a scene of her dominating Brad

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #77265
    253 428 12 E

    Ocillet

    Member

    dirtypig-2 said:
    wow so great quiality. Can you explain me how i can make awesome animations like this? Please

    Thanks. It's quite a few steps, but I can for you and others curious with how this works:

    You first need to generate a source image. The best way is to do it locally on your PC, since most online image generating programs do not allow any kind of NSFW content. You will need a decent video card capable of rendering image generation, and you can google where and how to download Stable Diffusion with an AI interface to run it. Most like Comfy UI, or a111. You will also need a model suitable for the content you want to generate. The main one for furry content is Yiffymix, which you can find on Civitai. This image was generated locally using the a111 interface with Yiffymix v52 as the model, and it took several dozen attempts before I narrowed down what I wanted, and then cleaned any minor errors using the inpainting tool.

    Once you have an image you like, you then need to use an image to video generation site. I use Kling AI, but you can try others like Hailuoai. There are trial periods for both of these sites, but you will eventually have to pay for credits. Both sites have a strict NSFW filter that scans the image you upload, and you have to be creative with certain elements to get the image accepted. Exposed boobs and genitalia are difficult to get by, but in the case of ferals, it is less restrictive since their "bits" are always out in a SFW manner. Even still, it may not be accepted if it thinks the image is naughty. You can sometimes get around this by turning the saturation of the image up to confuse the detection software, and then edit the color back to normal levels later with a video editing software.

    I'm using Kling as my example, but once your source image is accepted, choose the duration of the clip (5 or 10 seconds), use the motion brush if you want to give specific movement to certain areas, and give it a simple prompt of what you want to see, then let it attempt to generate. About 80% of the results you get will not be what you want. The character will move in a cursed manner, the laws of physics get thrown out of the window, body parts and attire will randomly appear or disappear, or it will just morph and shimmer a still image with no movement. There is no way to edit any specific errors, and you have to just retry the whole attempt if it doesn't work. You are very much rolling the dice, and the odds are rarely in your favor. Also, keep in mind that after your trial credits run out, a 5 second video clip (using the better 1.5 model) is about 35 cents (usd), and a 10 second video is 70 cents, so you will be burning some money on bad results, and they don't refund unless the attempt completely fails. It takes me about 20-40 generation attempts to get something like this and my previous videos. I have much better results generating 5 second clips and merging them together using Davinci Resolve, which will also allow you to color correct the video if you had to blow out the saturation of the source image.

    It's still early and restrictive for video generation, and I'm sure a guide like this will sound primitive in a couple of years, but image generation was in a similar boat not that long ago. In time, we'll be able to generate videos locally when it's more open source and optimized, so if all this sounds daunting, just give it a year or two. I'm quite excited to see what we'll be capable of generating.

  • |
  • 6
    •