Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #68271
    14 14 2 S
    post #46468
    200 321 3 E

    Ace The Batdog 1701

    Member

    fresh said:
    talk about going balls deep

    Now I need to see this more, is there a [tag] for that?

    givemeyourteeth said:
    Hope next time he puts his balls all the way in and she locks him inside her.

    That would be idealistic, I like it. I always kind of pictured female Arcanine as a "bigger" girl, who would be able to accommodate that nicely.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #68698
    180 297 4 E
    post #46240
    202 311 3 E
    post #46239
    188 298 1 E
    post #68631
    96 131 1 E

    Lewdify

    Member

    Woah! This whole sequence was really good! And creative! Those magic binding have a lot of potential for shenanigans lol

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #45823
    179 274 1 E
    post #45618
    177 310 3 E
    post #68779
    165 267 5 E
    post #68577
    63 130 2 E
    post #68581
    46 71 1 Q
    72 103 1 Q
    post #68775
    178 266 5 E
    post #53486
    138 227 1 E
    post #68139
    169 303 2 E
    post #66007
    177 266 1 E
    post #67533
    269 423 2 E
    post #68784
    146 253 2 E
    post #61640
    69 107 6 E

    BirdLover

    Member

    ohnowhat said:
    Was quietly waiting for a 100% feral, anatomically-correct kazooie post from BirdLover
    and talk about meeting expectations!

    AFAICT this is the first one on this site
    (post #54331 seems more semi-anthro rather than feral, because of the arm/back)

    Thanks. Always happy to oblige xD
    Kazooie is hot. Feral Kazooie even more so!

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #68779
    165 267 5 E
    post #68564
    66 97 7 E

    MikuBraver

    Member

    birdlover said:
    And here I thought I'm the only one that's into that kind of style. Glad to Hear others love it too :>

    It's a good style.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #68574
    104 136 4 E
    82 146 1 E
    post #68670
    117 212 1 E
    post #68692
    39 67 1 E
    post #68727
    88 156 2 E
    post #68775
    178 266 5 E
    post #68779
    165 267 5 E
    post #12439
    454 749 9 E
    post #68520
    220 375 2 E
    post #68524
    4 58 5 E

    Nocheamante

    Member

    torrin said:
    Aight, now we’ve gone too far

    Not far enough. She just didn't get to transform long enough before the photo was snapped. Give her a few seconds or minutes.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #68564
    66 97 7 E

    BirdLover

    Member

    hot~coffee said:
    Just what I needed 🔥

    And here I thought I'm the only one that's into that kind of style. Glad to Hear others love it too :>

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #66890
    29 52 1 Q
    post #66995
    85 143 5 E
    post #67813
    191 328 3 E
    post #68467
    61 83 3 Q
    post #68741
    110 153 3 E
    post #47322
    66 71 2 S
    post #68671
    184 262 4 E
    post #68023
    134 188 4 E

    KingFurryAI

    Member

    charlyss said:
    very pretty *

    <3

    Thank you! ♥️♥️♥️
    You also posted some great horse and pony rumps for us to delight ourselves!
    Keep up the great work! 😘

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #68686
    29 41 2 S
    post #68727
    88 156 2 E
    post #68734
    36 88 1 Q
    post #68666
    137 212 2 E
    post #68739
    22 28 1 E
    post #68733
    83 148 1 Q
    post #68717
    68 91 2 E
    post #68751
    15 18 3 S

    blp

    Member

    just a note: need to tag what you see, not what you prompted with. tags also should use an underscore rather than spaces. looking at viewer is three separate tags - looking, at and viewer which is probably not what you want.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #68741
    110 153 3 E
    post #68098
    224 378 5 Q
    post #68741
    110 153 3 E

    Moony

    Member

    Ooft this is amazing work, thanks for sharing and looking forward to seeing more!

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #61956
    74 88 1 E
    post #45308
    79 112 1 E
    post #60725
    7 6 1 S
    150 326 5 E
    post #64224
    73 102 1 Q
    post #68048
    119 188 1 E
    post #68698
    180 297 4 E
    post #68508
    103 180 2 E

    quicklime

    Member

    kabar308 said:
    Only flaw in this logic that I see is that now you have left a new dinosaur that was never supposed to exist in the timeline. Thus, you have altered the timeline even more.

    Maybe it's following the Novikov self-consistency principle. The current timeline always was one with a sudden extra dinosaur.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    60 92 1 E
    post #68677
    128 208 1 E
    post #68483
    60 69 3 Q
    10 19 1 Q
    post #68633
    97 161 1 Q
    post #66666
    37 51 4 E
    post #68073
    52 65 1 E
    post #68098
    224 378 5 Q
    post #68208
    86 162 1 E
    post #67627
    392 642 7 E
    post #68326
    64 88 2 E
    post #68328
    164 256 1 Q
    post #68467
    61 83 3 Q
    post #68414
    92 148 3 E
    post #68615
    88 127 3 E