Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #3060
    29 32 1 Q

    The pose, shading, lighting, body shape: well-directed all. He looks mightily huggable.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #3099
    78 135 3 E
    post #3034
    34 48 1 S
    post #3027
    26 51 1 E
    post #3014
    24 55 1 E
    5 9 1 Q
    5 12 1 E
    post #2976
    62 111 1 E

    first time uploading something here, i'm not sure if it exists tags for errors like the 2 penis along with the the way the eyes look
    there isn't a forum for these specific tags for AI generated so had to figure myself

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2963
    223 397 2 E
    post #2963
    223 397 2 E
    post #2962
    82 113 2 Q

    druidelite said:
    Omg someone stole her vagina!

    You can send this version to your friends and leave their dicks feeling perplexed. (^q^)

  • |
  • 3
  • post #2961
    280 528 1 E

    I don't know who uploaded it for me🤔I prefer to do it myself, but thanks anyway.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2962
    82 113 2 Q
    post #2827
    99 166 6 E

    pcaelifera said:
    A kid's cartoon or an adult cartoon?

    Adult one, very crappy humor and cursed content, but actually better than Brickleberry in my opinion. Features a surprising amount of bestiality and animal sex.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #2879
    17 28 2 Q
    post #2827
    99 166 6 E

    nelepus said:
    As in this image was is inspired by a character from a certain cartoon, but doesn't depict them accurately. Sorry, my English is a mess.

    A kid's cartoon or an adult cartoon?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2857
    117 269 1 E
    post #2833
    29 51 1 E

    unsure who posted this but it seems like a faithful upscale. Is there a way to replace the original post? don't want it sitting here as a dupe.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2827
    99 166 6 E

    pcaelifera said:
    "References", as in reference sheets, or as in comments?

    As in this image was is inspired by a character from a certain cartoon, but doesn't depict them accurately. Sorry, my English is a mess.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2827
    99 166 6 E
    post #2808
    23 27 1 S

    such a cutie, gonna have to add 'make hot bull terrier guys' to my list of things to do too

  • |
  • 1
  • post #776
    19 23 1 S
    post #2750
    18 17 1 S
    post #2414
    65 82 3 E
    post #2765
    28 57 1 E
    post #2676
    41 64 1 E
    24 49 1 E
    post #2624
    42 123 2 E
    post #2499
    13 26 4 Q
    post #2414
    65 82 3 E

    nelepus said:
    this version gained 5 times more upvotes than the female one; this says a lot about our society e6ai audience

    Sample sizes are too low to draw any conclusions yet.

  • |
  • 0
  • 83 140 5 E

    thefuzzyfloof said:
    Now I know!

    Hey guys, did you know that in terms of male human and female Pokémon breeding, Vaporeon is the most compatible Pokémon for humans? Not only are they in the field egg group, which is mostly comprised of mammals, Vaporeon are an average of 3”03’ tall and 63.9 pounds, this means they’re large enough to be able handle human dicks, and with their impressive Base Stats for HP and access to Acid Armor, you can be rough with one. Due to their mostly water based biology, there’s no doubt in my mind that an aroused Vaporeon would be incredibly wet, so wet that you could easily have sex with one for hours without getting sore. They can also learn the moves Attract, Baby-Doll Eyes, Captivate, Charm, and Tail Whip, along with not having fur to hide nipples, so it’d be incredibly easy for one to get you in the mood. With their abilities Water Absorb and Hydration, they can easily recover from fatigue with enough water. No other Pokémon comes close to this level of compatibility. Also, fun fact, if you pull out enough, you can make your Vaporeon turn white. Vaporeon is literally built for human dick. Ungodly defense stat+high HP pool+Acid Armor means it can take cock all day, all shapes and sizes and still come for more

  • |
  • 3
  • 83 140 5 E
    post #2499
    13 26 4 Q
    post #2499
    13 26 4 Q
    post #2499
    13 26 4 Q
    post #2414
    65 82 3 E

    this version gained 5 times more upvotes than the female one; this says a lot about our society e6ai audience

  • |
  • 2
  • post #2442
    36 39 1 E
    1 5 5 S

    Huh, for some reason this post isn't showing up on my profile, and it's not showing up in the modelscope or text2video tags either?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2426
    34 53 1 E

    Hmmm, I used to not like the faux lineart kinda artifacting that ersgan sometimes does, But it definitely highlights this guy pretty well ;3

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2420
    75 143 1 E
    1 5 5 S
    post #1522
    21 33 2 Q
    post #2312
    34 44 1 E
    1 5 5 S
    post #2279
    30 63 1 E
    post #2294
    31 51 1 E
    post #639
    77 134 4 E

    furrai said:
    It's actually two images. As far as I know, there's no way to specify multiple character trainings with AI. Each character was rendered separately, combined into one image, and run through image-to-image with a low strength to make the style match better. The text was added by hand.

    Ayo that's actually a genius idea :o

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2195
    40 93 1 E
    post #2175
    97 167 1 E
    2 1 1 E
    post #3
    130 124 53 S
    25 42 1 Q
    82 145 1 Q
    post #1944
    91 121 1 E
    post #1980
    19 38 1 E
    post #1928
    16 33 1 Q
    post #1948
    10 23 2 Q
    post #1948
    10 23 2 Q
    post #1752
    22 49 1 E
    post #1521
    13 11 1 Q
    post #1574
    9 19 1 Q
    post #1534
    15 36 1 Q
    post #1738
    14 32 1 E
    post #1715
    26 42 1 E
    post #186
    29 58 1 E
    post #1683
    39 96 2 E

    Wait. Is that... text that's not only discernable, not only pronounceable, not only cleanly-written, but MAKES SENSE IN CONTEXT? Wow. One in a million.

    Updated

  • |
  • 6
  • post #44
    15 7 1 S
    post #69
    62 91 3 E
    post #1375
    21 21 1 S
    post #861
    8 22 1 E
    post #917
    6 16 1 E
    post #1012
    2 8 1 E
    post #1182
    25 28 1 S
    post #1195
    14 27 1 E