Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #3468
    116 248 5 E

    bruhmoment12909 said:
    I've gotta know, what AI model did you use to make these?

    It's a checkpoint merger of 0.7 fluffyrock + 0.3 crosskemono2.5. It also uses custom LoRAs to generate the characters.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #3468
    116 248 5 E
    48 79 1 E

    Very nice! I've been playing around with Yiffymix for a bit, but would love to see a more feral centered checkpoint.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #3470
    67 112 1 E

    druidelite said:
    One of the best Judys out there, purrfect detail :D Only issue I have is she's wearing something. Lol

    Well :) We can fix that

  • |
  • 2
  • post #3350
    41 60 1 E
    post #3387
    38 79 2 E

    moglo said:
    have send promp and negate this?

    [<lora:Zoroark-000006:1>, Masterpiece, best quality], cinematic lighting, (highly detailed, realistic proportions, high detailed, 4k hdr), furry ((anthro)) female ((zoroark)), pokemon, clawed hands, hair, ((large breasts, ((huge breasts)))), detailed (zoroark) face
    (defined fur), ((fur over entire body)), (furry body)), (body fur), vagina
    
    full body, nude, nipples, sexy pose, sexy body,
    
    (sunbathing on the beach, clouds, sky, ocean, sand, distant islands), natural light, detailed fur, bokeh
    Negative prompt: (worst quality, low quality:1.4), (by boring e621, bad prompt:0.8), (human:1.2), simple background, (too many ears), extra ears, muscles, (artist name, watermark, text), speech bubble, multiple tails, oversized tail, skin, missing fingers, too many fingers, wearing shirt, no headwear, small breasts, shiny, (bright), chubby, ((human face)), ((human ears)), (bad anatomy)
    Steps: 50, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 7, Seed: 237366438, Size: 512x768, Model hash: 8344c83793, Denoising strength: 0.3, Version: v1.2.1, Hires upscale: 2, Hires upscaler: 4x_foolhardy_Remacri

    Model used is FurryVixens. https://civitai.com/models/17333/furry-vixens

  • |
  • 0
  • One of the best Judys out there, purrfect detail :D Only issue I have is she's wearing something. Lol

  • |
  • 1
  • post #3387
    38 79 2 E
    post #3333
    12 37 2 E

    garbagedayman said:
    I have a question.

    How did you get such a consistent character across several generations? guess it's quite impressive.

    Not really, just use a long list of tags, a good model, and just keep generating until something that looks good appears.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #3364
    29 54 1 E
    post #3333
    12 37 2 E

    I have a question.

    How did you get such a consistent character across several generations? guess it's quite impressive.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #3367
    27 38 2 Q
    19 29 1 Q
    post #3
    130 126 49 S
    post #3282
    42 68 4 Q
    post #3282
    42 68 4 Q

    fox76 said:
    Can't seem to get the artist right, I put the director name but the name of the director name keeps going to the general tags. The director name is Harunamiya.

    Done

  • |
  • 1
  • post #3282
    42 68 4 Q

    lance_armstrong said:
    What's the story?

    Can't seem to get the artist right, I put the director name but the name of the director name keeps going to the general tags. The director name is Harunamiya.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #3282
    42 68 4 Q
    post #3251
    98 201 2 E
    post #3137
    70 141 1 E
    post #3251
    98 201 2 E
    post #3230
    45 82 1 E
    5 13 1 E
    post #2717
    203 344 1 E
    3 4 2 S
    post #2467
    34 50 1 E
    post #2689
    16 45 1 E
    post #3215
    27 35 1 Q
    post #3176
    7 23 4 E
    post #3176
    7 23 4 E

    Considering the absolute horrifying nightmares a non-human creative force could create that you could never possibly unsee? This is the very
    definition of 'tame.' Also, the ghost of Doug Winger is among us!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #3176
    7 23 4 E
    post #3060
    29 32 1 Q

    The pose, shading, lighting, body shape: well-directed all. He looks mightily huggable.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #3099
    78 135 3 E
    post #3034
    33 47 1 S
    post #3027
    26 52 1 E
    post #3014
    24 55 1 E
    5 9 1 Q
    5 12 1 E
    post #2976
    62 112 1 E

    first time uploading something here, i'm not sure if it exists tags for errors like the 2 penis along with the the way the eyes look
    there isn't a forum for these specific tags for AI generated so had to figure myself

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2963
    223 399 2 E
    post #2963
    223 399 2 E
    post #2962
    83 114 2 Q

    druidelite said:
    Omg someone stole her vagina!

    You can send this version to your friends and leave their dicks feeling perplexed. (^q^)

  • |
  • 3
  • post #2961
    279 530 1 E

    I don't know who uploaded it for me🤔I prefer to do it myself, but thanks anyway.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2962
    83 114 2 Q
    post #2827
    99 167 6 E

    pcaelifera said:
    A kid's cartoon or an adult cartoon?

    Adult one, very crappy humor and cursed content, but actually better than Brickleberry in my opinion. Features a surprising amount of bestiality and animal sex.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #2879
    17 29 2 Q
    post #2827
    99 167 6 E

    nelepus said:
    As in this image was is inspired by a character from a certain cartoon, but doesn't depict them accurately. Sorry, my English is a mess.

    A kid's cartoon or an adult cartoon?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2857
    116 274 1 E
    post #2833
    29 51 1 E

    unsure who posted this but it seems like a faithful upscale. Is there a way to replace the original post? don't want it sitting here as a dupe.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2827
    99 167 6 E

    pcaelifera said:
    "References", as in reference sheets, or as in comments?

    As in this image was is inspired by a character from a certain cartoon, but doesn't depict them accurately. Sorry, my English is a mess.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2827
    99 167 6 E
    post #2808
    23 27 1 S

    such a cutie, gonna have to add 'make hot bull terrier guys' to my list of things to do too

  • |
  • 1
  • post #776
    18 22 1 S
    post #2750
    18 17 1 S
    post #2414
    65 83 3 E
    post #2765
    28 57 1 E
    post #2676
    40 63 1 E
    24 50 1 E
    post #2624
    41 123 2 E
    post #2499
    13 26 4 Q
    post #2414
    65 83 3 E

    nelepus said:
    this version gained 5 times more upvotes than the female one; this says a lot about our society e6ai audience

    Sample sizes are too low to draw any conclusions yet.

  • |
  • 0
  • 83 142 5 E

    thefuzzyfloof said:
    Now I know!

    Hey guys, did you know that in terms of male human and female Pokémon breeding, Vaporeon is the most compatible Pokémon for humans? Not only are they in the field egg group, which is mostly comprised of mammals, Vaporeon are an average of 3”03’ tall and 63.9 pounds, this means they’re large enough to be able handle human dicks, and with their impressive Base Stats for HP and access to Acid Armor, you can be rough with one. Due to their mostly water based biology, there’s no doubt in my mind that an aroused Vaporeon would be incredibly wet, so wet that you could easily have sex with one for hours without getting sore. They can also learn the moves Attract, Baby-Doll Eyes, Captivate, Charm, and Tail Whip, along with not having fur to hide nipples, so it’d be incredibly easy for one to get you in the mood. With their abilities Water Absorb and Hydration, they can easily recover from fatigue with enough water. No other Pokémon comes close to this level of compatibility. Also, fun fact, if you pull out enough, you can make your Vaporeon turn white. Vaporeon is literally built for human dick. Ungodly defense stat+high HP pool+Acid Armor means it can take cock all day, all shapes and sizes and still come for more

  • |
  • 3
  • 83 142 5 E
    post #2499
    13 26 4 Q
    post #2499
    13 26 4 Q
    post #2499
    13 26 4 Q
    post #2414
    65 83 3 E

    this version gained 5 times more upvotes than the female one; this says a lot about our society e6ai audience

  • |
  • 2
  • post #2442
    36 40 1 E
    1 5 5 S

    Huh, for some reason this post isn't showing up on my profile, and it's not showing up in the modelscope or text2video tags either?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2426
    34 53 1 E

    Hmmm, I used to not like the faux lineart kinda artifacting that ersgan sometimes does, But it definitely highlights this guy pretty well ;3

  • |
  • 0
  • post #2420
    75 143 1 E
    1 5 5 S