Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #138530
    121 136 3 S

    This is my favorite type of video. Just enough movement to bring a great picture to life, but avoiding the uncanny valley of trying to create movement that the ai isn't quite ready to handle

  • |
  • 2
  • post #138537
    109 190 3 E
    post #138543
    214 382 10 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    And natural selection would never create pupils that become heart shaped during mating. Very unscientific🧐

  • |
  • 6
  • post #138569
    174 294 2 Q
    63 86 2 E

    Could you repost with a fix? I thought it was perfect and was just about to save it.

  • |
  • 0
  • 238 372 2 E

    A great view. truly one of the best ways of presenting.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138569
    174 294 2 Q
    post #124622
    128 184 1 E
    post #138576
    29 38 2 Q
    post #138576
    29 38 2 Q
    post #138545
    115 154 1 Q
    post #121802
    13 12 2 E
    post #138397
    143 241 5 E
    post #138539
    239 441 1 E
    post #37055
    38 6 6 Q
    post #118481
    263 448 2 E
    post #133586
    176 283 1 E
    post #118353
    89 164 1 E
    post #138519
    307 545 2 E
    post #138489
    198 322 4 E
    post #138513
    291 565 4 E
    post #138365
    140 244 3 E
    post #138536
    298 478 1 Q
    post #138516
    65 69 5 Q
    post #138568
    108 203 1 E
    post #138519
    307 545 2 E
    post #135125
    90 93 7 Q

    This is very exciting! I'm glad you are back with more lovely otters <3 Good to see you again my friend

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138040
    42 43 1 S
    post #138071
    652 1.3k 13 E
    19 37 1 E
    post #138543
    214 382 10 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    What's even the point of pointing out inconsistencies with real life when you are talking about fictional animals..? Especially when said animal has a humanoid pussy in the first place. I honestly fail to understand.

  • |
  • 11
  • post #138549
    185 347 1 E
    post #130813
    222 346 1 E
    post #138510
    175 262 1 E
    post #138543
    214 382 10 E

    alaskan_huzky said:
    You know, a canine uterus would not look like that. They would look like a "Y" and not like an ape uterus. Just saying.

    Provide examples! 😍

  • |
  • 8
  • post #138499
    277 454 5 E
    post #138468
    127 190 2 Q
    post #138486
    105 164 2 E
    post #138504
    88 104 1 Q
    post #138505
    116 181 6 Q
    post #138466
    174 332 1 E
    post #135941
    180 316 2 E

    That's perfect. If it's not too much trouble, what do you use to generate it? It seems to me you only use a template, that's perfect.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138254
    137 219 3 E
    post #138541
    115 216 2 E
    post #136748
    106 101 12 S

    You have just generated the counterpart to the Mona Lisa's smile - furry style.

    I'll be coming back here anytime I feel down. That smile is heartwarming AF.
    Apologies if I'm being a creep here right now. :<

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #136741
    114 162 6 Q

    That level of realism and detailed fur/hair is... "stunning" wouldn't begin to describe it.
    And not just that. The detail on every rose, the paws, the irregularity of the fur... it's beyond anything i have seen generated.

    Makes me want to stop generating and posting anything really :x

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138431
    63 118 1 E
    post #138489
    198 322 4 E
    post #138542
    200 286 3 E
    238 372 2 E
    38 47 5 E

    tsuruchi said:
    Hunh. Would you believe me if I told you I didn't even pay attention to that at all? I do use negative prompts, "Signature, watermark, logo, patreon, name", but even doing that they still pop in and I don't catch them. Thanks for the heads up.
    I'll scrutinize and post another one, I'm just kinda "testing the waters" for uploading images.

    Heh, yeah I believe it. It's easy to miss little errors, and they're really strict about it here, so you'd be well advised to really scrutinize your stuff with a fine-tooth comb. Extra fingers/toes, weird-looking fingers or uneven numbers of them, misshapen eyes or even nostrils, JPG compression, AI signatures... they're all grounds for merciless deletion. 😮

    Well, like raiinbow dash pointed out, you can always remove this one by hand or crop it out, that's easy enough. Then you can just reupload it and it should pass, I think.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #137869
    44 54 1 E
    post #138518
    33 30 1 S
    24 44 2 E
    post #106147
    101 181 1 E
    post #57537
    89 153 3 Q
    post #137882
    130 141 9 E

    zeroabsolute said:
    Not exactly tattoos, but fur patterns are obtained by carefully shortening the hair, revealing the darker colored fur unerneath, or by cutting the hair altogether exposing the pale skin for contrast. Fur-art on camels is a thing for real.

    Interesting! Didn't know that. Yeah I could see some beastkin doing that practice too, then.
    The magical chromashift as pictured is a more permanent cosmetic solution, for the vixen-on-the-go - so much leg spreading to do, no time for tedious fur vanity!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138537
    109 190 3 E
    post #138084
    447 674 13 E

    zeroabsolute said:
    If there is one thing I learned about terraraptor's art, it's you can't have too many cats in one picture.

    This was originally going to be a pt II for post #136137 (all the same species + a jaguar), and they were gonna be plastered in cum, an after_sex scene. But sorta changed my mind and went another direction with it mid-way.

    juan-doe said:
    anatomically_correct_pussy would have made this peak. still quite enticing.

    Yeah I almost always go the anatomically correct route except for felines. Too small and subtle, not really much to look at IMO, you would barely see much in this composition. Maybe if it were a single closeup.

  • |
  • 2
  • 43 66 1 E
    post #138277
    465 863 3 E
    post #138537
    109 190 3 E
    post #138293
    35 61 29 S

    rawdog said:
    Did not expect pro-life arguments in an e6 comment section. A surprise for sure, but a welcome one

    denying people human rights is a welcome one? so how do you force someone to give birth and raise a child they don't want to have

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138456
    46 67 2 E

    angelofox said:
    "It's because of Ose, Joe!"

    I swear to God if I see a picture of Joe's dragonsona getting topped by Ose I'm going to lose it

  • |
  • 0
  • post #138533
    117 152 3 E
    post #138307
    320 450 8 E

    At this point I just want to know some midria insults, because saying "fuck you" to this lizard would probably miss the point.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #138084
    447 674 13 E

    juan-doe said:
    anatomically_correct_pussy would have made this peak. still quite enticing.
    gonna have to dock points for 2 lionesses and 0 leopards, though ;)

    Gonna have to give those points back because there IS a snow leopard there, and lionesses are based af.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138084
    447 674 13 E

    If there is one thing I learned about terraraptor's art, it's you can't have too many cats in one picture.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #118604
    74 115 1 E
    post #133507
    172 259 3 E
    post #137882
    130 141 9 E

    Not exactly tattoos, but fur patterns are obtained by carefully shortening the hair, revealing the darker colored fur unerneath, or by cutting the hair altogether exposing the pale skin for contrast. Fur-art on camels is a thing for real.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #138401
    240 430 2 E
    119 201 1 E
    70 110 2 E
    post #138345
    103 130 2 Q