Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #136045
    290 479 4 E
    post #137372
    39 84 10 Q
    post #136977
    39 35 3 S

    Deep into the dark depths do they wander. Do I dare sense a collection?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #137351
    126 177 1 E

    WOAH thats a pretty! wonderfull.
    i love this image and PetPetPet it with my mouse...
    my favorite style is cartoon, yes, but that image here???
    it prooves for me again to not BlackList something.
    reality can be a beauty and everything else too i guess... because AI?

    haha whatever, i love that image very much.
    thanks for shareing <3

  • |
  • 0
  • 48 71 1 E
    post #137359
    105 158 2 E
    post #137364
    213 351 3 E
    post #137368
    72 113 1 E
    post #137388
    204 354 5 E
    post #137365
    66 138 1 E
    127 209 2 E

    That just means the Pokémon wants to be under the trainer's control and that the trainer wants to dominate it.

  • |
  • 0
  • 18 22 1 Q
    80 86 4 S

    theeffortgenner said:
    B-But....Dat ass!

    I believe her ass would look the same if the tail was located in a more anatomically correct way. I'm not saying her ass look ugly, or that the animation is ugly.

  • |
  • -2
  • 80 86 4 S

    alaskan_huzky said:
    I wonder if anyone agrees with me, if humans had tails (or if anthro furries were real) their tails would be very close to the butt, and they would hang MUCH more vertically. Anyone else agree with this? To me, this tail in the animation, is too high up and too horizontal. Remember, the tail is an extension of the vertebral column. The tail should start where the human coccyx is. So, assuming that humanoid has human like bones, the tail is completely wrongly position and bended in an impossible angle. Just saying.

    B-But....Dat ass!

  • |
  • 6
  • post #137380
    142 210 3 E
    post #136905
    175 225 1 E
    post #137372
    39 84 10 Q

    rawdog said:
    No.
    But the upvote is there to say "I like this." Why wouldn't the downvote be there to say "I don't like this?" If I don't like something I see, I click the button. It's not that deep

    But the people voting this down are objectively wrong

  • |
  • 0
  • 45 85 2 E
    80 86 4 S

    I wonder if anyone agrees with me, if humans had tails (or if anthro furries were real) their tails would be very close to the butt, and they would hang MUCH more vertically. Anyone else agree with this? To me, this tail in the animation, is too high up and too horizontal. Remember, the tail is an extension of the vertebral column. The tail should start where the human coccyx is. So, assuming that humanoid has human like bones, the tail is completely wrongly position and bended in an impossible angle. Just saying.

  • |
  • -5
  • post #137372
    39 84 10 Q

    redpanda2025 said:
    I'm just curious, do you clowns that downvote things on here for some trivial reason, or because it's not perfect in your eyes, also go to furry conventions and

    No.
    But the upvote is there to say "I like this." Why wouldn't the downvote be there to say "I don't like this?" If I don't like something I see, I click the button. It's not that deep

  • |
  • 6
  • post #137372
    39 84 10 Q

    redpanda2025 said:
    I'm just curious, do you clowns that downvote things on here for some trivial reason, or because it's not perfect in your eyes, also go to furry conventions and complain about fursuits that aren't perfect in some way? A loose thread, or maybe the character is out of proportion, but maybe it's supposed to be that way ... instead of liking the wonderful variety and creativity of those who put work into things like that? Do you do that? Just wondering....

    I agree, and normally I wouldn't like this, but the more I watch, the more I'm interested

  • |
  • 1
  • post #137372
    39 84 10 Q

    I'm just curious, do you clowns that downvote things on here for some trivial reason, or because it's not perfect in your eyes, also go to furry conventions and complain about fursuits that aren't perfect in some way? A loose thread, or maybe the character is out of proportion, but maybe it's supposed to be that way ... instead of liking the wonderful variety and creativity of those who put work into things like that? Do you do that? Just wondering....

    Updated by mlem


    User received a record for the contents of this message.
  • |
  • 3
  • post #136306
    164 288 8 E

    pachurisu said:
    I thought it's "tag what you see", not "tag what you discovered on another platform"?

    Sure that makes sense the majority of the time, I think this situation is a little different. Because the person who made this image also gave out the prompt to make this image and it uses "young" and "child" a couple of time each. So I can understand why it was taken down and surprised it's back up.

  • |
  • -1
  • post #132331
    300 509 2 E
    45 85 2 E
    post #137372
    39 84 10 Q
    post #137372
    39 84 10 Q
    post #137260
    170 291 3 E

    peche said:
    I like it, but the left and right legs are not visible, is that on purpose?

    Even I have no idea where the legs should go in this pose - the AI had zero chance. Let's just say they're sitting on a very specialized chair with built-in leg holes

  • |
  • 1
  • post #137359
    105 158 2 E
    post #137361
    129 182 3 E
    post #137105
    93 160 2 E
    post #137315
    144 219 4 E

    sugi said:
    Tropius, obviously. Other half is harder, but the feet, colouration, and segmentation are a dead giveaway for Grotle.

    Yes for Tropius 😁
    And honestly your second guess would be a better candidate than the one I actually used in the prompt >_<
    It was Blaziken, but since both pokemon are verrrrry different I guess one of the two has been slightly sidelined :-\

    Updated

  • |
  • 1
  • post #137343
    279 426 4 E

    Frame rate reminds of the movie Rudolph the red nosed reindeer, maybe just put a toy or puppet lora over it

  • |
  • 1
  • post #135771
    597 1.1k 13 E
    post #137315
    144 219 4 E

    Tropius, obviously. Other half is harder, but the feet, colouration, and segmentation are a dead giveaway for Grotle.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #135021
    574 1.0k 16 E
    post #134269
    505 864 6 E
    post #124655
    663 1.1k 3 E
    post #136707
    268 401 2 E
    post #137332
    130 176 1 Q
    post #129993
    757 1.4k 17 E

    dixonuranus said:
    I'd like to see this without the hands

    99% of your comments are telling people what to do and what to gen LMAO. Calm down and gen stuff yourself lil bro

  • |
  • 2
  • post #137343
    279 426 4 E

    woah woah take it easy there MFU. if you start animating, the fuckin sky is gonna fall

  • |
  • 2
  • post #109979
    231 383 2 E
    post #137141
    117 200 1 E
    127 209 2 E
    post #137283
    277 456 1 E
    post #136787
    37 59 1 E
    post #137314
    153 239 6 E
    post #137293
    259 384 1 Q
    post #137275
    135 200 2 E

    Destiny! Well, this has been a while! Glad to see you ag... oh... sorry!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #137312
    44 50 1 S
    post #137329
    32 38 1 S

    WOW
    to see those moves...
    unexpected.
    really good AI work, thanks!
    absolutely awesome!

  • |
  • 4
  • post #137328
    37 47 1 E
    post #137314
    153 239 6 E
    post #137230
    193 319 2 E

    norlus said:
    Dominant Gryphon always a good thing.

    She has the rear of a equine so that makes her a hippogriff. ;3

  • |
  • 2
  • post #137324
    211 363 1 E
    post #137286
    129 220 1 Q
    post #137278
    35 29 1 S
    post #137259
    132 209 3 E
    post #137320
    87 148 1 E
    post #137285
    115 192 1 E
    post #137315
    144 219 4 E
    post #137260
    170 291 3 E

    I like it, but the left and right legs are not visible, is that on purpose?

  • |
  • 0
  • 50 55 2 E
    post #137216
    162 261 3 E
    post #137314
    153 239 6 E
    post #137198
    248 401 3 E
    post #135098
    109 157 2 Q
    32 32 3 E
    post #137179
    275 433 1 E
    32 32 3 E
    post #137053
    316 472 3 E
    post #137194
    108 122 2 S
    post #137230
    193 319 2 E
    post #137027
    26 40 1 Q