Comments

Blacklisted
    (help)
    Show Search Options
    post #121845
    128 231 1 E
    post #121833
    69 105 1 E
    post #121850
    363 580 3 E
    post #121719
    207 325 2 E
    post #121652
    174 290 1 E
    post #58517
    149 255 1 E
    post #59955
    163 307 2 E
    post #95480
    228 356 3 E

    Boltz

    Member

    Now I understand why all the dogs wanted Georgette... look at this beauty

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #100256
    169 245 2 E
    post #121851
    339 564 4 E
    post #121733
    88 128 1 S
    post #121817
    123 186 1 S
    post #121851
    339 564 4 E
    post #121777
    178 284 1 E
    post #121754
    191 369 1 E
    post #121766
    191 310 1 E
    post #121703
    167 317 1 E
    post #121747
    270 442 5 E
    post #111757
    90 150 2 E
    post #121676
    194 325 1 E
    post #62895
    56 102 2 E
    post #121855
    104 128 2 S
    post #121846
    76 114 1 S

    Nagiman90

    Member

    She is such a cutie. Nerdy glasses, shy attitude, tiny tits, she's just the perfect little nerdy girl next door.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #118494
    34 42 4 E
    post #121855
    104 128 2 S
    post #121662
    51 57 1 Q
    post #121841
    114 186 2 E

    Vargrklaw

    Member

    ironhorse said:
    this is I believe the third time these were re-posted ... wondering what the problem is with these images ... just curious

    Anomalies and watermark/signatures that I missed and cleaned up.

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #121844
    63 103 1 Q
    post #121841
    114 186 2 E

    IRONHORSE

    Member

    this is I believe the third time these were re-posted ... wondering what the problem is with these images ... just curious

  • |
  • 1
    •
    post #121762
    211 361 2 E
    109 151 2 E
    post #121701
    12 8 2 S
    post #121668
    87 127 2 Q
    post #119934
    102 100 7 Q
    post #121802
    10 12 2 E
    post #121710
    62 65 2 S
    post #121759
    170 269 3 E
    post #121798
    14 28 1 E

    jons

    Member

    Look, I think they were onto something. I'd have liked to see more of this Snivy

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #121751
    139 252 1 E
    post #121673
    290 495 1 E
    post #121210
    110 176 1 E
    post #121532
    46 64 1 Q

    BoShamp95

    Member

    Man, I came across her bad time in my life cause some problems with her story. I didn’t see the warnings at the beginning of the video so my fault but yeah.

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #121688
    223 399 1 E
    post #121745
    108 181 3 Q
    post #121740
    156 234 4 E
    post #121583
    190 325 3 E

    Zaddha

    Member

    chaos475 said:
    Your style is something very unique. I adore each and every one of your generations. Please - keep them coming!

    This is the artist snowskau's style, not mine!

  • |
  • 3
    •
    post #121743
    188 296 6 E

    Namsi

    Member

    Dang, thats good!
    Can't afford a card to get any video diffusion model running :(

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #121763
    78 136 3 E
    post #121731
    243 352 7 E

    nosuitnosoul

    Member

    zerphy said:
    my bad, I think it should work now

    I really hope this doesn't get deleted for realism but even if it does just more reason to follow your telegram! Please keep up the great realistic and less-realistic work!

  • |
  • 5
    •
    post #121745
    108 181 3 Q
    4 1 1 E
    post #121747
    270 442 5 E

    ClF3

    Member

    mikubraver said:
    Thank god that the wings only show Silhouettes one way. ;3

    Well, can't exactly show a silhouette of someone when there's no light source to cast their shadow in that direction.

    Although at the angle of the only know source of illumination here, one can argue that their shadow shouldn't reach unless they were right up against the wing.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #121759
    170 269 3 E
    post #121503
    94 159 2 Q
    post #110412
    33 45 2 Q
    post #121731
    243 352 7 E
    post #121745
    108 181 3 Q
    102 183 1 E
    post #121731
    243 352 7 E
    post #121713
    524 939 4 E
    post #121731
    243 352 7 E
    post #121655
    414 683 8 E

    Meh6

    Member

    Wow, this is amazing! If you don't mind me asking, what model did you use for this? Did you also use some additional loras, embeddings or styles? I would love to try this for myself

  • |
  • 4
    •
    post #121740
    156 234 4 E
    post #121747
    270 442 5 E
    post #121722
    228 418 4 E

    WhereWolf

    Member

    Well fortunately I work from home. So I drop everything and *run* to the bedroom to help my hot bunny gf who is clearly in dis-dress. :P

  • |
  • 3
    •
    109 151 2 E

    badwolf1

    Member

    I would not mistake this for IRL, but I suppose some dumb people could.

  • |
  • 7
    •
    post #121665
    39 51 2 S

    crashbandit

    Member

    heavengosthh said:
    Hello,
    might I ask if you have an automated way to generate the generation metadata present in the description ?

    It is automated. ComfyUI saves the workflow metadata with the file. My actual setup is a bit more complicated than this, but basically I have a process which reads the metadata attached to the image and generates the description. It also populates some of the tags.

  • |
  • 2
    •
    post #121731
    243 352 7 E
    post #121668
    87 127 2 Q
    post #121128
    18 25 1 E
    post #121195
    17 27 2 E
    post #121609
    23 37 2 E
    post #121701
    12 8 2 S
    post #121665
    39 51 2 S

    heavengosthh

    Member

    Hello,
    might I ask if you have an automated way to generate the generation metadata present in the description ?

  • |
  • 0
    •
    post #121713
    524 939 4 E