Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #114508
    161 194 2 Q
    post #114343
    226 381 4 E
    post #114448
    109 152 1 E
    post #104588
    105 147 5 E
    post #114493
    578 1.0k 4 E

    Wow! Just wow! Looks very realistic. I love that his dick is somewhat average and not a giant brick. And her gripping labia is also very nice.

  • |
  • 16
  • post #114444
    403 687 4 E
    post #109534
    181 266 6 Q
    post #114444
    403 687 4 E
    post #114488
    165 242 9 E
    post #114246
    46 71 1 E
    post #103749
    137 221 4 S
    post #114493
    578 1.0k 4 E
    post #114459
    44 92 1 E
    post #114488
    165 242 9 E
    post #114441
    99 181 1 E

    I saw when this got removed for having 3 fingers. Smh. I see alot of bad ai stuff here and it was weird to see the first one get removed

  • |
  • 1
  • post #85787
    384 656 7 E

    I'm surprised this made it here. The pussy stroke magically adds another finger.

    horsefucker5 said:
    Maybe the AI doesn't recognize animal pussy, because this is uncensored AF

    Exactly this. I ran a few things and as long as it wasn't something vanilla porn-like, it didn't detect it as anything bad. The detection model was created using far too innocent a dataset.
    Hyena with plump, black labia? Sure.
    A bear in panties? NOPE!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #113312
    84 82 5 E
    post #113696
    81 134 4 E
    post #114488
    165 242 9 E

    motelsaint said:
    They aren't brothers through blood, purely through their bond together. Brothers from another mother basically.

    Ahh, so brothers in the spiritual sense, gotcha.
    Still, I love 'em. They're great 💜

  • |
  • 2
  • post #114488
    165 242 9 E

    sergalbutt said:

    Fuck yes


    Also, I do have to wonder: is this an actual incest or a technical incest situation?

    Not that I'm bothered either way, I just want to understand your adorable characters more 💜 (and for tag reasons :P)

    They aren't brothers through blood, purely through their bond together. Brothers from another mother basically.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #114489
    118 167 2 Q
    post #114488
    165 242 9 E

    Fuck yes


    Also, I do have to wonder: is this an actual incest or a technical incest situation?

    Not that I'm bothered either way, I just want to understand your adorable characters more 💜 (and for tag reasons :P)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #114363
    48 107 1 E
    post #114474
    49 76 2 E
    post #114371
    65 128 4 E

    caballus_j said:
    I think the telegram channel link doesn't work anymore.
    Is there a new chat?

    The Telegram channel link is a permalink so it should never not work.

    I suggest checking the settings in the app
    Settings -> Chat Settings -> Show 18+ Content
    And if you can't do it in the app, if you log in via a web browser, you can enable it there and that setting carries over to the app.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #114424
    43 44 1 S
    post #114446
    70 103 1 E
    post #114444
    403 687 4 E
    post #114411
    177 276 2 E
    post #114234
    123 229 1 E
    post #114443
    141 228 2 E
    16 16 1 Q
    post #114248
    164 291 4 E
    post #98512
    268 467 5 E

    kemowolf said:
    One of these days, male creators will learn you can't pierce the cervix with a dick, and if you did, you would cause permanent damage to the woman.

    And yet we can't stop seeing furry art with the woman in rapture with an internal to show her cervix being punctured.

    Yes
    But some kinds of canines can enter the tip of their urethra into the cervix. But not like on the art.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114269
    229 373 1 E
    post #114278
    142 225 2 E
    post #114304
    22 24 1 S
    post #109456
    61 94 13 E
    post #114386
    86 131 1 E
    post #113753
    179 245 3 E

    fuck yes. Eyes looks some creepy, but its already so good

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114391
    102 174 1 E

    Don't know if I'm being drawn in by her behind or her eyes. ;3

    Just something about green glowing eyes really pull you in.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #114418
    242 405 2 E
    97 174 1 E
    106 0 7 E

    haroldleviticusgrimm said:
    There's a little face above her tailhole. 0_0

    Damn, that's embarrassing. Is it possible to directly replace it with a fixed image direct or do I have to flag it for deletion or how do I do?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #113127
    122 171 4 Q
    post #114411
    177 276 2 E

    Nah, one isn't enough, it'll be at least 5 bangs to make sure she's howling and walking funny.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114179
    34 46 1 E
    post #114371
    65 128 4 E
    106 0 7 E
    post #113872
    70 92 1 E
    post #114351
    103 129 2 Q
    post #105118
    116 191 1 E
    post #114180
    34 47 1 S
    post #114371
    65 128 4 E
    post #114232
    217 349 2 E
    17 30 2 E

    Not a huge fan of the face but the fur detail around the crotch area is super good. Can has nude version?

  • |
  • 1
  • post #71235
    13 29 3 Q
    post #99487
    485 821 3 E
    post #114277
    211 365 1 E
    post #57411
    18 27 1 E
    post #114320
    45 79 4 E
    post #107153
    48 63 15 E
    post #114222
    103 152 2 E
    post #114076
    111 163 1 E
    post #114371
    65 128 4 E
    38 11 1 E

    flagged ..... must be an upscale problem .. i'm just amazed, art with eye problems or a pixel out of place get deleted within hours of posting .. but this remains. Don't get me wrong I like this, but clearly seems too human.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #114262
    88 139 1 E
    post #114341
    384 689 3 E
    post #114377
    392 637 4 E

    Nerd Facts: Cheetahs aren't the smallest of large felines, but the largest of small felines. They're very much upscaled housecats built specifically for GOTTA GO FAST.

  • |
  • 11
  • post #114199
    68 85 1 S
    26 1 3 S
    post #114217
    266 451 3 E
    17 30 2 E
    26 1 3 S

    I'm not a downvoter, but I can take some guesses as to why people are doing it.

    • The first minute of the video is literally just text.
    • The first bit of AI video is a static image for far too long before there's any animation.
    • The 10 seconds of just logo color cycling at 1:54
    • The off-to-the-side static images
    • The "editorial commentary" style subtitles over the lyric subtitles
    • I also think the overall WIP nature of it all - even with you clarifying as such - has a lot to do with it.

    On that last point also, the Quality Standards in the Uploading guidelines do state

    Only upload finalized, polished works. We want the best representation of your work, not placeholders intended for later fixes. Please complete any necessary edits before uploading.

    What you have here is, at best, a draft, but it's not a completed work.

    Personally, I think it's an interesting concept, you just gotta cook it a little more.
    (and don't pay attention to the numbers on your posts on this site. That's a great way to send yourself kookoo-bananas.)

    Hopefully the randoms haven't dissuaded you, because I think once this is completed, this will be as interesting as it is in your mind's eye. 👍

  • |
  • 2
  • post #97157
    112 186 2 E