Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #112123
    109 180 5 E
    post #112105
    146 265 1 E
    post #112115
    63 84 1 E
    post #112116
    66 96 1 E
    post #112124
    272 465 2 E
    post #112069
    229 386 2 E
    post #112114
    66 103 2 E
    post #111995
    85 113 4 E

    bluescreenedwolf said:
    You’re telling me this is your first?! Blowing my mind with how photorealistic it is with no mistakes! Can’t wait to see how you go from here~

    Thanks! I do have a few other ones I'm working on, although I may not be super active.
    Was mostly curious about the process and what is doable.
    So far I've found it rather limited, as most of my attempts to make more interesting and/or expressive scenes has reduced the overall quality drastically.
    I may make something new from time to time if I get inspired, otherwise I'm mostly planning on finishing what I have.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #111847
    104 105 3 S
    post #112068
    136 257 1 E
    post #111891
    116 194 1 E
    post #111702
    65 75 3 S

    bearhugger said:
    "Bro, this is not what I meant when I said you could touch them"

    "Sorry girl, your ears are tempting, but that adorable face you're making is worth it"

  • |
  • 2
  • 4 0 6 Q

    stablexai said:
    Still you are right, some people do indeed downvote just for not liking things. I do have some fetishes which get targeted like this. And a reminder is a good thing.
    But keep in mind it's not always about that. Also don't take downvotes too seriously or personal. Would be better. Some people always downvote even perfectly fine images with no fetishes.

    I don't take it personally but like, I cannot find the logic in people actively looking for stuff they don't like with the sole purpose of downvoting.
    Anyway, I (hopefully) fixed it up in post #112104 , and gave you a little shoutout for spotting it and correcting me (if that's okay)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #112102
    57 86 2 E

    Nice! Love female mewtwo stuff, and showing of their skills.
    I do have a few like this too - actually quite a lot, I just struggle with free time fixing them up.
    <3

  • |
  • 1
  • 4 0 6 Q

    sergalbutt said:
    Y'know, I did take a peek at the official ref, and I stand corrected.
    I did mess it up.

    Still you are right, some people do indeed downvote just for not liking things. I do have some fetishes which get targeted like this. And a reminder is a good thing.
    But keep in mind it's not always about that. Also don't take downvotes too seriously or personal. Would be better. Some people always downvote even perfectly fine images with no fetishes.

  • |
  • 1
  • 4 0 6 Q

    stablexai said:
    No hard feelings but google "Sergal" please. During my non-AI artist time I did draw several sergal images including some refs.
    And sure some of them "look like" having an extra joint but it goes the other way around downwards.

    Y'know, I did take a peek at the official ref, and I stand corrected.
    I did mess it up.

  • |
  • 1
  • 4 0 6 Q

    sergalbutt said:
    Sergal feet are like that! It's not two heels, per se, but there is another joint there.

    I do appreciate the criticism though, honestly.

    No hard feelings but google "Sergal" please. During my non-AI artist time I did draw several sergal images including some refs.
    And sure some of them "look like" having an extra joint but it goes the other way around downwards.

  • |
  • 0
  • 4 0 6 Q

    stablexai said:
    ... in this image the feetpaws have two heels; One on the ground and one against the couch.

    Sergal feet are like that! It's not two heels, per se, but there is another joint there.

    I do appreciate the criticism though, honestly.

  • |
  • -1
  • post #111887
    136 201 4 E
    4 0 6 Q

    I do like paws and have a paw fetish.
    I for example usually downvote an image when there are anatomical errors, or AI based things which would have been easy to fix but kept in the image, which will be trained into future models.
    Or when it feels like the person is out for quantity over quality, or when their logo is half the size of the image. (I'm just talking general here, not about you.)
    It's hard to blacklist those things.

    I mean you do good things, but for example in this image the feetpaws have two heels; One on the ground and one against the couch.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #111957
    75 103 3 E
    post #112097
    134 194 4 E
    post #111991
    128 158 4 E

    zabern said:
    Funny thing is that I was trying to make the last few as realistic as possible. It is quite hard to make the model understand that I want a animated character to look like they are real, without them just truing in to a regular woman. I have lots of failed versions of these animations that are just furry bodies with real faces on them.

    Yeah I've run into similar even with pictures. Realistic furry is still tough to achieve. Sometimes they look more like a weird photo of those anime cat girls with just a snout and ears on a woman's face.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #112007
    73 139 1 E
    post #104116
    220 340 2 E
    post #111990
    83 156 2 E
    post #111991
    128 158 4 E

    kingk said:
    I may be in the minority, but I personally think this semi-realistic style is better than the last few cartoony animations.

    Funny thing is that I was trying to make the last few as realistic as possible. It is quite hard to make the model understand that I want a animated character to look like they are real, without them just truing in to a regular woman. I have lots of failed versions of these animations that are just furry bodies with real faces on them.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #111987
    16 73 3 E
    post #111982
    243 376 8 E
    post #111702
    65 75 3 S
    post #111886
    490 822 4 E

    The lioness looks gorgeous in ideal fun size. Good work on her expressions too :) I imagine people can see quite exotic pairings so there is something to admire for everyone.
    I wonder who lives below the cum drain. Hmm...

  • |
  • 2
  • post #111565
    106 153 2 Q
    post #112028
    206 407 3 E
    post #84128
    71 102 3 E

    paj said:
    Who is the source? and do they have a fitting male counterpart?

    I created only female variant.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #111995
    85 113 4 E

    You’re telling me this is your first?! Blowing my mind with how photorealistic it is with no mistakes! Can’t wait to see how you go from here~

  • |
  • 1
  • post #112028
    206 407 3 E
    post #112012
    60 58 3 S
    post #112025
    48 49 3 S

    the lil bro we all wanna spend all night watching old youtube videos with 💖

  • |
  • 3
  • post #112027
    212 416 3 E
    post #111982
    243 376 8 E

    I do that too while at work when it's freezing out, standing under a plane while it's idling blasting out warm air. 👍

  • |
  • 5
  • post #111991
    128 158 4 E

    I may be in the minority, but I personally think this semi-realistic style is better than the last few cartoony animations.

  • |
  • 8
  • post #111967
    191 319 3 E
    post #110869
    104 145 2 E

    The picture is gorgeous, but the right ear spoils everything...When you turn your head like that, it's in the wrong place...(too far from the right side)

  • |
  • 1
  • post #109925
    189 318 4 E

    The fox's face looks contradictory. The head seems to be looking straight (judging by the nose, which shows only one nostril), but for some reason the left eye is visible, although the head is not turned.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #111759
    67 68 3 S
    post #111987
    16 73 3 E

    That's way to much and over the top for my taste. And it's the wrong genital form for a feline. This looks just unhealthy :D but hey...everyone his own beer.

  • |
  • -2
  • post #111852
    135 227 2 E
    post #111829
    71 60 8 E
    post #111549
    190 351 1 E
    post #111950
    25 25 2 S
    post #111941
    56 91 1 E
    post #111760
    103 170 2 E
    post #111943
    95 161 2 E
    post #110807
    21 11 2 S
    post #111916
    336 567 3 E
    post #111912
    428 746 5 E
    post #111968
    70 134 1 E
    post #111986
    281 501 3 E
    post #111883
    319 543 4 E

    Absolutely diving straight in!

    Gonna miss your gens, Corset. Hope you enjoy your break!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #111996
    83 159 1 E
    post #111997
    54 78 1 E
    post #111961
    131 208 1 Q
    post #111959
    52 63 1 Q
    post #111985
    78 119 3 E
    post #111986
    281 501 3 E
    post #111939
    91 149 4 Q
    post #111171
    256 433 4 E
    post #111883
    319 543 4 E
    post #111982
    243 376 8 E
    post #111887
    136 201 4 E
    post #84128
    71 102 3 E

    Who is the source? and do they have a fitting male counterpart?

  • |
  • 1
  • post #111911
    66 90 1 Q
    post #111750
    269 460 1 E
    post #111967
    191 319 3 E

    Delicious! Bonus points for big balls draped on objects.
    Could only be improved if he was wearing boxers or pants with his junk slung through the fly.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #111967
    191 319 3 E