Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    23 31 1 E

    The situation with the passive's left foot is somewhat confusing...When comparing it with the right one, it is not clear where this length goes. In a good way, they should be in the same position.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #93005
    249 417 4 E

    corsetlover69 said:
    100% agree with this!

    (Also totally unrelated but seeing someone use my gens as a pfp made my day :) )

    You are welcome. Zebras are also an underrated species, and it is rare to find "good" pictures. Zebra mare are my spirit animal. And your works are always a banger, so i found my pnp :D.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106447
    457 803 3 E

    My god...how i love this. More power to interspecies riding positions. :D

  • |
  • 4
  • post #106401
    608 1.0k 19 E

    assquatch said:
    Their double standards do not end on quality control either, they're extremely inconsistent in their calls. It's obvious that they can't separate their personal preferences from guidelines at all.

    As I am still convinced that in this and in other posts, people who watch it don't give a shit about any flaws/glitch in the video, as well as moderators as I see. But no, it's still such a hyper attitude towards video quality, like I'm being paid for video quality or making money off of it. Speaking of quality, https://e6ai.net/posts/105013 earlier such a video would have been deleted without question, but no, not only does it look like they wiped their ass, but also with multiple glitches, accepted by the way Сeti

  • |
  • 6
  • post #105931
    252 380 5 Q
    post #105833
    88 163 1 E
    post #106464
    223 383 1 E
    post #106390
    36 44 5 S
    post #79293
    137 246 2 E
    post #106004
    512 906 2 E
    post #106385
    146 217 6 E
    post #106384
    263 456 1 E
    post #106461
    113 153 1 Q
    post #102788
    398 752 6 E

    zaxxxer said:
    As rb2303 said under one of another post:

    Many thanks

    I have been enjoying these builds by otter very much over time

    Saw yours recently too !

    Awesome work to both of you!!!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106332
    157 344 3 E
    post #106290
    147 212 4 E
    post #106396
    274 499 6 E
    post #106300
    15 16 17 S

    assquatch said:
    *voice and reason*

    Thank you Mr. Ass for the intelligence, reading the whole jargon from others on my posts is very amusing

    :D

  • |
  • 0
  • post #105946
    232 491 1 E

    Gosh this just tickles me so much, the blush, the eye contact, the cum, so delicious together~

  • |
  • 6
  • post #106332
    157 344 3 E
    post #105875
    76 134 2 Q
    14 17 1 E
    post #105498
    278 428 5 E

    I think there are reserved places for you to link to those things (though the info is pretty scattered...). But looking at e621:rules#advertising and uploading guidelines#ads: Since this image is not paywalled, I'm pretty sure you use your DA post directly as the source (which I added already). The DA main user page might be problematic only because it doesn't show much except the paywall, at least without logging in. You can still link on your own profile on your user page (Settings > "About Me" and "Commission Info") and your director tag wiki page. (I expect them to eventually adapt the e621 "artists" page too.)

    I suspect the main issue is that additional links elsewhere starts to look spammy, and maybe also link farming or SEO.

    Updated

  • |
  • 2
  • post #106348
    41 48 2 S
    post #106347
    254 479 3 E
    post #106403
    39 29 3 S
    post #106338
    183 342 3 E
    post #106385
    146 217 6 E
    post #106372
    118 172 1 S
    post #106239
    36 28 5 S
    post #99677
    79 127 1 E
    post #106290
    147 212 4 E
    post #106416
    136 258 1 E
    155 254 3 E
    post #106412
    261 455 2 E
    post #106401
    608 1.0k 19 E
    post #106401
    608 1.0k 19 E

    vlrgromns said:
    I love moderators for double standards, sometimes fuck for wrong moving pixel, which only under a magnifying glass will notice, but some extra limb as at 0:20, we accept, do not care. The work is good, by the way. If you play the role of moderator even more, you can still get to the teeth of the dog, would write like this ”Does not meet minimum quality standards (Artistic - the dog's teeth look like needles)"

    Their double standards do not end on quality control either, they're extremely inconsistent in their calls. It's obvious that they can't separate their personal preferences from guidelines at all.

  • |
  • 26
  • post #105655
    368 599 3 E

    how did I miss this??? Sooo dang good, presentation and everything! Your romantic stuff hits home for me as well!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #106403
    39 29 3 S
    post #106401
    608 1.0k 19 E
    post #106275
    81 192 3 E
    post #106401
    608 1.0k 19 E

    I love moderators for double standards, sometimes fuck for wrong moving pixel, which only under a magnifying glass will notice, but some extra limb as at 0:20, we accept, do not care. The work is good, by the way. If you play the role of moderator even more, you can still get to the teeth of the dog, would write like this ”Does not meet minimum quality standards (Artistic - the dog's teeth look like needles)"

  • |
  • 21
  • post #106402
    169 283 3 E
    post #106399
    312 606 2 E
    post #106401
    608 1.0k 19 E
    post #106401
    608 1.0k 19 E

    This is amazing. Please do some other famous animated dog. Nana would be the best!

  • |
  • 5
  • post #52299
    90 151 1 E
    post #106399
    312 606 2 E
    post #106332
    157 344 3 E
    post #106401
    608 1.0k 19 E
    post #104991
    63 97 6 S
    post #106401
    608 1.0k 19 E
    post #106052
    195 289 9 Q
    post #106390
    36 44 5 S
    post #106065
    111 195 4 E

    pawprintz15 said:
    It's the lack of shadows on the ground under their feet. They're supposed to be cast on the ground by their bodies' silhouettes.

    That's what creates the floating, or having been pasted in, illusion. It happens in game design with character models not casting a shadow.

    Appreciate the advice. I'll keep that in mind for the future.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #106390
    36 44 5 S
    post #106363
    58 92 2 E
    post #106394
    70 84 1 S
    post #106383
    172 235 1 Q
    post #106289
    156 262 2 Q
    post #106393
    144 203 2 E
    post #106374
    132 186 6 E
    post #106390
    36 44 5 S
    post #106385
    146 217 6 E
    post #105296
    121 242 1 E
    post #106280
    107 186 1 E
    post #106249
    90 143 5 E

    birdlover said:
    My Goodness! Arsol (?), this is amazing!

    Please continue bringing more feral birds to this world :3

    Its not that good, but im glad you like it

  • |
  • 1
  • post #106350
    176 263 2 Q

    Can't blame her for wanting to get a little closer. These two are gorgeous and they make such a lovely pair. Love the expressions and that playful little grope.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #106052
    195 289 9 Q
    post #106374
    132 186 6 E
    post #105085
    53 67 1 E
    post #106369
    156 290 1 E

    "Tredici04" my mind saw "04" and finally came to the conclusion that anyone born in '04 is 21 and now I feel old, not the vibe I wanted when looking at some good AI stuff. 😭😭😭

  • |
  • 5
  • post #106374
    132 186 6 E
    post #105971
    79 112 3 E

    mikubraver said:
    I just love geckos, her head marking are my fav thing about her. :3

    Wonder if the male is Gex. ;3

    Fully Agree :3

    Indeed he's Gex xD (I was prompting for Gex, but I failed *facepalm*)

  • |
  • 2
  • post #106373
    142 187 1 Q