Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    41 74 3 E
    159 264 3 E
    post #98195
    196 350 8 E

    alouiskindaguy said:
    Teats are underrated.

    I know right?!? I tried so hard to find a model that would work with udders and I finally got it to collab :) Took me like two or three hours to find the right mix.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #98524
    192 340 1 E
    post #98521
    25 35 2 S

    Dang. All he wanted was the same thing anyone else would have wanted.I guess because of his neck beard he was dealt a less savory hand.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #50463
    89 124 7 Q
    post #98523
    277 480 12 Q

    Probably the smartest way to string together short ai videos that these sites create. Keep it up!

  • |
  • 8
  • post #98520
    259 467 5 E
    post #98523
    277 480 12 Q
    post #98457
    290 419 9 E

    tr1zer said:
    She's gotten a bit larger. I like where this is going.

    I say that this is the right size for her as in the game she's about the length of Dust's arm.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #98511
    84 122 4 E
    post #98489
    165 285 4 E
    75 113 4 E

    I see she has breasts. while not oversize Massive breasts. they are still there. Plenty Of girls out there over 18 With A Cup, B cup size breasts.

  • |
  • 6
  • post #98493
    174 324 9 E
    post #97594
    317 542 3 E
    post #96449
    165 243 10 E

    mcgiwer said:
    The animation seem to have either a incorrect codec or format because when I attempt to open it, I recjeve the "File is corrupted" error, like it would be limited to don't run anywhere 🤔

    They used to work. I viewed post #96837 just yesterday or the day before, and it was working fine. Something must've changed for the site's codecs or pc/smart device codecs.

    Edit: the videos (seemingly all of Zabern's) work on my Meta Quest 2 oddly enough. idk if it uses different codecs, something with its framework vs pc/smartphone framework seems to be different.

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98479
    149 251 3 E
    post #98457
    290 419 9 E
    post #50063
    136 257 2 E
    post #61462
    182 324 1 E

    is he holding the camera with his right hand and the left arm is wrapping around the POV

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98492
    114 153 1 E
    post #98489
    165 285 4 E
    post #98496
    63 115 1 E

    That's more of a double cetacean penis instead of a snake penis, but... artistic freedom, right?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98511
    84 122 4 E
    post #58619
    118 142 2 Q
    post #96449
    165 243 10 E

    The animation seem to have either a incorrect codec or format because when I attempt to open it, I recjeve the "File is corrupted" error, like it would be limited to don't run anywhere 🤔

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98409
    142 243 1 E
    post #98436
    186 336 4 E
    post #98457
    290 419 9 E
    post #98486
    183 347 1 E

    Finally someone who got horse dick right on a anthro as most of the time they don't scale it down from feral to the anthro build, so you end up having anthro's with dick half the size of their body.

  • |
  • 10
  • post #96487
    332 492 2 E
    post #97819
    2 24 4 E

    dragonsaurmon said:
    Because this I don't make females.

    Well, that’s the thing. A lot of people make the mistake of trying to generate scat art in a single shot. It’s understandable, when AI art has come to the point of generating hands and such properly on your first, second, or third try. But to a model, a hole is a hole, and insertion is insertion, especially when it has to generate a single frame.

    The key is to generate a base image without scat, and then use inpainting features to re-generate the parts of the image where scat would actually appear.
    Even with a fitting LoRA, you still get results like this sometimes.

  • |
  • 2
  • 46 42 3 S

    Yeah, I have to check multiple times daily and jump on them and DL them instantly, some have been my favorite pieces that have been deleted do to some ambiguous "doesn't meet the uploading guidelines."

  • |
  • 0
  • 20 16 7 S
    post #98485
    208 363 3 E
    post #98459
    225 382 8 Q

    farmerbearlovesmoos said:
    Where can I pick up this magazine???

    Ah, you’ll find it nestled between Cat Fancy and What Doggos Do in Their Secret Lives at your local newsstand. 🐾 Disclaimer: Magazine may or may not come with a free squeaky toy and a doggo autograph (paw print included).

  • |
  • 0
  • 75 113 4 E
    58 86 9 E

    kingk said:
    What is the issue with this one? I'm not trying to be a jerk, but I'm honestly confused.

    I just save everything I like locally these days. Mods are far too strict with applying the guidelines.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98405
    119 191 2 E
    75 113 4 E

    I also don't understand why it's marked for deletion.?? 🧐
    there are obviously just some people who are a pain in the ass... 😤
    just because she looks young doesn't mean she is young....

  • |
  • 8
  • post #98459
    225 382 8 Q

    nagiman90 said:
    This would be awesome, especially in themes, like Nurse Edition, Maid Edition, Lingerie Edition, Sex Toys, etc...

    The idea was to create different breeds, but I'll consider those options too. By the way, I have some free time today. Second cover soon?

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98449
    410 759 6 E
    post #98385
    108 190 4 E
    55 79 5 E

    ashgothorns said:
    I thought so at first glance, took me a bit to realize the leftmost finger had 2 nails, one growing form below.

    Hm, maybe so. I guess there's something there. I kinda overlooked it as indescernible since it's a sketchy style. I guess maybe I'm more forgiving of AI works when it comes to less glaring anatomical issues, considering what it sometimes throws out there, especially with pieces that use uncommon art styles.

  • |
  • 2
  • 55 79 5 E

    kingk said:
    Okay seriously mods, is this all the same person? What's the issue now? He has glaucoma? He's trans? I thought abusing the flag system was bannable? I know I'm also not supposed to complain, but it really seems as though somebody just has a vendetta, or an unrealistic expectation of an AI site.

    I thought so at first glance, took me a bit to realize the leftmost finger had 2 nails, one growing form below.

  • |
  • 0
  • 55 79 5 E
    post #66628
    98 169 5 E
    75 113 4 E

    I honestly didn't see this as young, based on her proportions and the tilt towards a breast in the first panel. It's just a flat coloring style common to anime that makes a shaved puss look hairless.

    I guess you see what you want to see.

    Updated

  • |
  • 12
  • 58 86 9 E

    danzabowo said:
    They usually cite it in your profile when it's deleted. I'm not sure either, but I assume maybe the teeth? idk

    Yeah that's all I can think of, but I don't see where odd creatures are against the guidelines. I mean, call him a kelpie if it makes you feel better. How is that not okay, but charr and bugbears are?

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98479
    149 251 3 E

    She's beautiful, and that blush is sooo adorable! I just wanna scoop her up and never let go 🥰

  • |
  • 1
  • post #98465
    58 122 1 E
    post #98454
    109 167 5 E
    post #92833
    279 387 16 E

    anotherfurryfan4679 said:
    So I take it the batfolk from that one image are from a different region? So Volume 3 eventually?

    Thanks! Funny you ask - the bat was in this lineup during the WIP phase. I ended up removing her though, they're more suitable for another thematic volume. So yes, something for later.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #98493
    174 324 9 E

    I didn't pay much attention to the story at first, but when I read that it was the first comic on this site, I reread it from the beginning and have to say, it's not bad.
    Now I'm really curious to see how the story continues.

  • |
  • 10
  • post #98489
    165 285 4 E
    46 42 3 S
    post #98459
    225 382 8 Q

    This would be awesome, especially in themes, like Nurse Edition, Maid Edition, Lingerie Edition, Sex Toys, etc...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #98454
    109 167 5 E

    Actually, Saint in a church ? That idea is just so obvious that nobody have ever done it lmao, and I love it !

  • |
  • 1
  • 64 92 3 E
    64 92 3 E
    post #96282
    138 253 2 E
    post #81891
    131 257 4 E
    post #10359
    86 172 1 E
    post #98371
    189 329 6 E

    furriestguninthewest said:
    Yeah they're getting a bit excessive with the quality requirements. There are so many where I just can not find what they could possibly be complaining about.

    I flagged one a couple weeks ago here, legs bent horribly wrong.
    It was left up, but oh god you have a sixth knuckle that can only be seen by enlarging and nitpicking.
    Getting to the bullshit level.
    What about the hundreds of old crap posts here they won't delete.

    Believe it, the other site suddenly claims to have standards, just fricking funny with thousands of absolute shitposts they won't dump.
    I think they are both owned by the same person(s) being set up identically.

  • |
  • 3
  • 55 79 5 E
    post #53017
    57 83 1 E
    post #98456
    240 380 5 E
    post #98406
    137 254 5 E
    post #98421
    206 370 3 E

    The dog anthro is perfect - just change the human with a furry and it's gold tier

  • |
  • -10
  • 20 16 7 S
    46 42 3 S
    post #98143
    104 161 6 E
    post #98424
    112 129 1 S
    post #94939
    58 63 5 S

    Holy moly, she is a cutie-patooty even when she is angy.

    Great gen and thanks for sharing.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #66801
    167 304 1 E