Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #94661
    249 442 3 E
    post #94622
    158 248 2 E
    post #94651
    23 55 2 E
    post #94653
    214 336 2 E
    post #94608
    120 172 7 E

    Woah this is fantastic! Cleo doesnt get the love she deserves, be it on here or anywhere!

  • |
  • 2
  • post #94486
    27 32 2 E

    Very confused about the rating here. No sex organs on display, but explicit? Just a cute boi, spilling his creamer... Seems pretty SFW? 🤔

  • |
  • 0
  • 117 174 1 E
    post #94601
    81 92 1 S
    post #94628
    153 282 2 E
    post #94630
    158 247 3 Q
    post #94598
    116 158 1 Q
    post #94608
    120 172 7 E
    post #94615
    97 172 1 E
    post #94608
    120 172 7 E

    horsefucker5 said:
    It's always crazy seeing a character show up for the very first time on this website

    Yeah, I was a bit surprised there weren't any pictures of her here.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #94612
    79 156 1 E
    post #94618
    73 126 1 E

    Goat Mom rocking that thong. Visiting a hotel room for a little work maybe by the looks of it.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #94502
    68 83 1 Q
    post #94565
    120 176 3 Q
    post #94573
    66 117 4 E
    post #94608
    120 172 7 E
    post #94608
    120 172 7 E
    post #94109
    268 437 5 E

    This is the best kobold I’ve seen on here, amazing. I wonder if she is bubble gum flavored? 🤔

  • |
  • 1
  • post #94608
    120 172 7 E
    post #94609
    160 280 1 E
    post #94313
    125 221 2 E
    post #94313
    125 221 2 E
    post #79822
    76 89 4 S
    post #94565
    120 176 3 Q
    post #94602
    166 268 2 E
    post #94575
    697 1.1k 2 E

    Maned wolves are a species just obscure enough for me to regularly forget they exist, and be delighted all over again by how very legged they are when reminded.

  • |
  • 13
  • post #94551
    165 255 3 E
    post #94497
    183 325 2 E
    post #90365
    48 78 2 Q
    post #84818
    250 395 9 E
    post #94434
    127 201 4 Q
    post #93942
    37 55 3 E
    post #94547
    188 265 2 E

    horsefucker5 said:
    These are all very sexy shapes in essence. But her torso is actually completely disconnected from her haunches

    It was made using out of date models. I'm actually surprised it got approved. I'll flag it and try to find a replacement. Thanks for noticing it.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #94456
    135 239 1 Q
    post #24462
    106 178 1 E
    post #94573
    66 117 4 E
    post #94541
    132 188 3 E
    post #94547
    188 265 2 E

    These are all very sexy shapes in essence. But her torso is actually completely disconnected from her haunches

  • |
  • 0
  • post #94536
    91 166 1 E
    150 261 7 E

    lilac_clouds said:
    Hey, thanks for the comment! Really encouraging for me to see people actually like my work; I'm currently trying to rework some of the images that were deleted to bring them up to snuff. Till then, anyone who is interested is free to DM me and I'll gladly share the current edits (along with the rest of the series, a total of 14 images).

    Hey, good for you and I’m excited. This is one of the highest upvoted posts I’ve personally seen deleted so you are doing something right. Good luck!

  • |
  • 0
  • post #93302
    70 105 1 E
    post #56550
    142 259 3 E

    Time to create a separate save for um........ "future playthroughs"...

  • |
  • 1
  • post #94444
    408 689 6 E

    She certainly has been doing some training since last time~

    Always great to see your yeen, Mavefig!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #94451
    222 378 3 E
    post #94529
    129 210 2 E

    I love that she looks almost surprised haha. Anyways, this is such a great generation! Her wet mouth over his cock, her little tongue, a paw on his balls, the fluffy fur. All simply sublime!

  • |
  • 3
  • post #94549
    359 614 3 E
    post #94175
    239 397 2 E
    post #94180
    180 287 4 E
    post #94292
    99 139 2 E
    post #94384
    76 96 1 Q
    post #94444
    408 689 6 E
    post #87682
    550 877 7 E
    post #92876
    83 77 6 S

    theshoresofhell said:
    Did the AI interpreted that being that close to fire would burn the tip of their paw? hehe, that's quite impressive if it's that way

    As someone who has done a bit of inpainting, I'm going to guess:
    SD generated it with the paw overlapping the stones like that, and the genner decided to have fun with it, and added the smoke and burn mark.
    A giveaway, that I haven't figured out how to avoid, is brushstroke resolution. The grainyness elsewhere, mimicking the effect of bristles on canvas, changes in density when inpainting at a higher resolution.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #94549
    359 614 3 E
    post #93949
    303 539 3 E
    45 62 1 E
    post #94285
    45 37 1 S

    that's really nice. i wonder if it was fully generated with minor edits by hand or just selectively assisted with manual painting involved. and if it was mostly generated then i'd really like to get the model files needed for something like this

  • |
  • 2
  • post #94441
    78 128 3 E
    post #94573
    66 117 4 E
    post #49461
    189 379 2 E
    post #94573
    66 117 4 E
    25 23 1 Q
    post #94558
    47 55 2 Q
    post #94333
    133 188 6 E

    I was wondering if anyone can help me I am currently having a problem with Approver DeNatural. Every single new post I've been trying to post on the site I've been flagged multiple times I don't know why all of my stuff is legit made by a generator but somehow I've been flagged numerous occasions. So is there anyone that can help me solve my issue because I am getting a little angry about this.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #90754
    278 459 20 E

    raiinbow_dash said:
    It's funny you point out those "similar images". You have the ability to blacklist them!

    I would advise you use "faceless_character" in your blacklist, instead of going to all of the faceless_character images to complain about them :)

    And pull quite a few images where NO character has eyes?

    Updated by Jelloponies


    User was banned for the contents of this message.
  • |
  • -4
  • 8 11 2 E

    hey @Dragonfox , thanks for the upload.

    I noticed you didn't seem to include a director tag.
    Are you the director of this ai-art?
    Do you know the director name of the director?? (ie. artist name of the ai-artist)

    In the meantime, I've tagged with unknown_director.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #94505
    210 361 1 E
    post #94549
    359 614 3 E
    post #94333
    133 188 6 E

    I like the partial transformation, with the black nips and skin myself. Perhaps a full on laying on back, POV with a cookie? Definitely something!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #94541
    132 188 3 E
    post #94511
    199 323 1 E