Comments

Blacklisted
    Show Search Options
    post #68904
    32 38 1 Q

    I admit for my part to have trouble understanding the rules on some details.
    Some images in appearance "loli" pass while others do not, I made the experience with a furry image that should not normally be of the loli I posted but was finally deleted for this
    After this one looks like it visually, so it will not stay I think

    Someone added a flag, visibly this is the case

    Updated

  • |
  • 0
  • post #68823
    46 64 1 S

    Can we get more with this sassy purple little rat?
    I want to see her getting proper attention :3

  • |
  • 1
  • post #68782
    156 234 6 E
    post #68872
    3 29 10 S
    post #68847
    1 12 5 S
    post #68880
    186 305 2 E
    post #45865
    67 97 2 E
    post #68484
    85 128 2 E

    lickit69 said:
    More please this is hot af

    Well yeah of course it's hot, she works at a forge, smh.

    I'll try to do something more with her, xoxo.

  • |
  • 2
  • post #68483
    60 69 3 Q

    bigaiwomenenjoyer said:
    YOU'RE BACK! I was really hoping seeing new things from you! You made the most perfect things on here! <3

    Ayyy thank u <3

    I'm at your service, king

  • |
  • 1
  • post #62978
    71 104 1 E
    post #64649
    45 76 2 E
    post #66475
    74 134 1 E
    post #68751
    15 18 3 S

    blp said:
    just a note: need to tag what you see, not what you prompted with. tags also should use an underscore rather than spaces. looking at viewer is three separate tags - looking, at and viewer which is probably not what you want.

    I'm a little bad at the formalities of all this, but once I sober up I'll get around to it.

  • |
  • 0
  • post #178
    122 193 1 E
    post #42320
    95 139 2 S
    post #16136
    99 155 1 E
    post #16126
    83 132 1 E
    post #27642
    62 74 1 E
    post #41737
    59 81 1 E
    post #41509
    78 109 1 E
    post #64031
    167 286 2 Q
    post #67086
    109 135 6 Q
    post #61674
    40 46 1 E

    He did knot it technically.
    Edit: I just noticed the details on the top.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #68828
    7 13 3 S
    post #61639
    82 133 3 Q
    post #68879
    81 116 1 E
    post #61637
    61 100 1 E
    post #60342
    101 190 1 Q
    post #67821
    71 101 2 Q
    post #67571
    74 106 1 E
    post #68824
    115 158 3 E
    post #66041
    33 72 2 E
    post #67136
    211 401 3 E
    post #68787
    107 208 1 E
    post #68564
    66 97 7 E
    post #68791
    307 592 5 E
    post #68791
    307 592 5 E
    post #68808
    68 84 1 E

    I'll admit, horse feet with human legs weirds me out a little. But please keep up the pony content. You're great at it😘

  • |
  • 0
  • post #68810
    96 141 2 E

    In Equestria, letting your fetlocks and belly fur grow shaggy, is like when hippie girls don't shave their leghair to rebel against society. At least that's my headcanon now.

  • |
  • 3
  • post #68865
    62 74 3 E
    post #62895
    56 102 2 E
    post #68744
    161 271 1 E
    post #68377
    118 231 1 E
    post #68795
    134 259 3 E
    post #68786
    101 172 2 E
    post #67089
    283 439 5 E
    post #68755
    194 312 2 E
    post #1852
    19 25 1 E
    post #63520
    91 114 6 S

    nocheamante said:
    If we ever got the the point of allowing anthros to be born, looking like this would greatly soften non-furries in society.

    To be fair, most anti-furries don't strike me as anti-anthros, just people who dislike the furry fandom. If real furries existed, the fact that they're another sapient species would be a big deal, bigger than how they look. They're no longer a drawing, but a real living and thinking person.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #58732
    59 98 1 E
    post #68775
    178 266 5 E
    post #68847
    1 12 5 S

    "Русский фурь неприхотлив, зато очень похотлив"

  • |
  • 3
  • post #68779
    165 267 5 E

    Damn. That's flawless. The symmetry of the jewelery across the limbs, the execution of the spinal spikes. It's even got mostly correct shadowing from the light source. Damn!

  • |
  • 1
  • post #68824
    115 158 3 E
    post #68212
    103 168 4 E
    post #68292
    40 74 1 E

    Well now, that's a handsome blend of quadrupedal and bipedal anatomy.

  • |
  • 1
  • post #52723
    130 163 8 E

    denatural said:
    Umm, in the description there’s a link to my blog where I’ve already should have explained everything to get you going. If anything’s still unclear, feel free to ask me on Discord, and I’ll be happy to help with any questions.

    I saw the prompts that were used to generate the images, but that page doesn't tell what you use the prompts in? Like Perchance.org or what not. That's what I was asking about :)

  • |
  • 0
  • post #68574
    104 136 4 E
    44 57 1 E
    post #68829
    5 15 1 E
    post #48096
    93 135 2 E
    post #68818
    36 47 5 Q
    post #63177
    54 85 6 E
    post #68748
    101 151 1 E
    post #68804
    55 81 2 E

    Lickit69 isn't here yet so I'll say the magic words. More please!

  • |
  • 2
  • post #68782
    156 234 6 E

    p1xel~d0g said:
    AI forgot the rat's large incisors. Nice image anyways...

    I actually had a version like that, and also this one, I preferred the teeth on this one, little more nasty bite :P I do have a mouse that is similar with more accurate teeth though that will upload soon :D

  • |
  • 4
  • post #68818
    36 47 5 Q
    post #68775
    178 266 5 E
    post #31773
    15 10 4 S
    post #68460
    178 316 1 E
    post #68623
    207 339 4 E
    post #68782
    156 234 6 E
    post #68776
    90 162 2 E